When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment

It is a common socio-moral practice to appeal to reasons as a guiding force for one’s actions. However, it is an intriguing possibility that this practice is based on fiction: reasons cannot or do not motivate the majority of actions—especially moral ones. Rather, pre-reflective evaluative processes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lasse T. Bergmann, Jennifer Wagner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00203/full
id doaj-d4ff1ef9f39c4a32931a3b32228368d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4ff1ef9f39c4a32931a3b32228368d72020-11-25T02:39:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-02-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.00203482836When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of JudgmentLasse T. BergmannJennifer WagnerIt is a common socio-moral practice to appeal to reasons as a guiding force for one’s actions. However, it is an intriguing possibility that this practice is based on fiction: reasons cannot or do not motivate the majority of actions—especially moral ones. Rather, pre-reflective evaluative processes are likely responsible for moral actions. Such a view faces two major challenges: (i) pre-reflective judgments are commonly thought of as inflexible in nature, and thus they cannot be the cause of the varied judgments people rely on in everyday life, and (ii) if reflective reason-based judgments do not play a strong causative role in judgment, why do people rely on the articulation of reasons in their moral practices? And how is moral agency and moral theorizing possible without it? We argue that the pre-reflective judgments motivating moral actions are embodied in nature. The experience of the rightness of an action that drives a person to act depends on the sensorimotor interactions that have cultivated an agent’s perspective on the world. These interactions are embedded in relational contexts, relative to which judgments are individuated. Because of this relational embeddedness, they are more flexible than they are commonly thought to be, enabling us to explain the variety of human behavior by appealing to them. The Anglo-European practice of appealing to reason as if they were propositional belief-statements motivating actions can be accounted for as nothing more than an idiosyncratic way of constructing narratives to clarify and express the relational context of intentional actions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00203/fullmoral cognitionembodied cognitionenactive account of perceptionmoral judgmentssocial intuitionism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lasse T. Bergmann
Jennifer Wagner
spellingShingle Lasse T. Bergmann
Jennifer Wagner
When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment
Frontiers in Psychology
moral cognition
embodied cognition
enactive account of perception
moral judgments
social intuitionism
author_facet Lasse T. Bergmann
Jennifer Wagner
author_sort Lasse T. Bergmann
title When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment
title_short When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment
title_full When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment
title_fullStr When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment
title_full_unstemmed When Push Comes to Shove—The Moral Fiction of Reason-Based Situational Control and the Embodied Nature of Judgment
title_sort when push comes to shove—the moral fiction of reason-based situational control and the embodied nature of judgment
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-02-01
description It is a common socio-moral practice to appeal to reasons as a guiding force for one’s actions. However, it is an intriguing possibility that this practice is based on fiction: reasons cannot or do not motivate the majority of actions—especially moral ones. Rather, pre-reflective evaluative processes are likely responsible for moral actions. Such a view faces two major challenges: (i) pre-reflective judgments are commonly thought of as inflexible in nature, and thus they cannot be the cause of the varied judgments people rely on in everyday life, and (ii) if reflective reason-based judgments do not play a strong causative role in judgment, why do people rely on the articulation of reasons in their moral practices? And how is moral agency and moral theorizing possible without it? We argue that the pre-reflective judgments motivating moral actions are embodied in nature. The experience of the rightness of an action that drives a person to act depends on the sensorimotor interactions that have cultivated an agent’s perspective on the world. These interactions are embedded in relational contexts, relative to which judgments are individuated. Because of this relational embeddedness, they are more flexible than they are commonly thought to be, enabling us to explain the variety of human behavior by appealing to them. The Anglo-European practice of appealing to reason as if they were propositional belief-statements motivating actions can be accounted for as nothing more than an idiosyncratic way of constructing narratives to clarify and express the relational context of intentional actions.
topic moral cognition
embodied cognition
enactive account of perception
moral judgments
social intuitionism
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00203/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lassetbergmann whenpushcomestoshovethemoralfictionofreasonbasedsituationalcontrolandtheembodiednatureofjudgment
AT jenniferwagner whenpushcomestoshovethemoralfictionofreasonbasedsituationalcontrolandtheembodiednatureofjudgment
_version_ 1724784881971494912