Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator

In this study, a fluidic oscillator was optimized based on the three-dimensional unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis to enhance peak jet velocity at the outlet and simultaneously reduce pressure drop. A multi-objective genetic algorithm performed the optimization with surrogate modelin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han-Sol Jeong, Kwang-Yong Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2017.1379441
id doaj-d4fdabddc08b489b874433e5b39eaec1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4fdabddc08b489b874433e5b39eaec12020-11-25T02:46:16ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics1994-20601997-003X2018-01-0112116918110.1080/19942060.2017.13794411379441Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillatorHan-Sol Jeong0Kwang-Yong Kim1Inha UniversityInha UniversityIn this study, a fluidic oscillator was optimized based on the three-dimensional unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis to enhance peak jet velocity at the outlet and simultaneously reduce pressure drop. A multi-objective genetic algorithm performed the optimization with surrogate modeling. The ratios of the inlet nozzle width and the distance between the splitters to the throat width were chosen as the design variables. And, two objective functions related to peak jet velocity at the outlet and pressure drop through the fluidic oscillator were selected for the optimization. Ten design points were selected in the design space using a Latin hypercube sampling method; the objective functions were calculated by unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis at these design points to construct surrogate models that were used to approximate the objective functions. Two different surrogate models, namely response surface approximation and Kriging models were tested. Pareto-optimal front representing a compromise between the two objective functions was obtained from the multi-objective optimization. The optimization results indicated that a jet velocity-oriented optimum design increased the peak jet velocity ratio at the outlet and the friction factor by 11.18% and 16.82%, respectively, when compared to those of a friction factor-oriented design.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2017.1379441Fluidic oscillatormulti-objective optimizationunsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equationsresponse surface approximationKrigingPareto-optimal solutions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Han-Sol Jeong
Kwang-Yong Kim
spellingShingle Han-Sol Jeong
Kwang-Yong Kim
Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Fluidic oscillator
multi-objective optimization
unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations
response surface approximation
Kriging
Pareto-optimal solutions
author_facet Han-Sol Jeong
Kwang-Yong Kim
author_sort Han-Sol Jeong
title Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
title_short Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
title_full Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
title_fullStr Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
title_full_unstemmed Shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
title_sort shape optimization of a feedback-channel fluidic oscillator
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
issn 1994-2060
1997-003X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In this study, a fluidic oscillator was optimized based on the three-dimensional unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis to enhance peak jet velocity at the outlet and simultaneously reduce pressure drop. A multi-objective genetic algorithm performed the optimization with surrogate modeling. The ratios of the inlet nozzle width and the distance between the splitters to the throat width were chosen as the design variables. And, two objective functions related to peak jet velocity at the outlet and pressure drop through the fluidic oscillator were selected for the optimization. Ten design points were selected in the design space using a Latin hypercube sampling method; the objective functions were calculated by unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis at these design points to construct surrogate models that were used to approximate the objective functions. Two different surrogate models, namely response surface approximation and Kriging models were tested. Pareto-optimal front representing a compromise between the two objective functions was obtained from the multi-objective optimization. The optimization results indicated that a jet velocity-oriented optimum design increased the peak jet velocity ratio at the outlet and the friction factor by 11.18% and 16.82%, respectively, when compared to those of a friction factor-oriented design.
topic Fluidic oscillator
multi-objective optimization
unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations
response surface approximation
Kriging
Pareto-optimal solutions
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2017.1379441
work_keys_str_mv AT hansoljeong shapeoptimizationofafeedbackchannelfluidicoscillator
AT kwangyongkim shapeoptimizationofafeedbackchannelfluidicoscillator
_version_ 1724759489533444096