Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”

This paper is dedicated to analysis the impact of some dispositions in Law no. 202/2010 regarding the degrees of jurisdiction in criminal cases. Although it is not expressly regulated by the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, the celerity is required as fundamental principle of the criminal trial, as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anca-Lelia LORINCZ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2011-08-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/969/810
id doaj-d4ea869debb2448fa2c352a9ab6275b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4ea869debb2448fa2c352a9ab6275b72021-10-02T03:45:46ZengDanubius UniversityActa Universitatis Danubius: Juridica1844-80622065-38912011-08-0172147157Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”Anca-Lelia LORINCZ0Police Academy "Al. I. Cuza"This paper is dedicated to analysis the impact of some dispositions in Law no. 202/2010 regarding the degrees of jurisdiction in criminal cases. Although it is not expressly regulated by the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, the celerity is required as fundamental principle of the criminal trial, assuming the requirement that the conduct of the criminal trial and the settlement of the criminal cases should take place as soon as possible. The principle of celerity is combined though with the fundamental principle of disclosure of truth in the criminal trial (Art.3 of the Criminal Procedure Code), requiring the insurance of a balance between the need to accelerate the procedures for settlement of the cases in a reasonable time and the need to run through more degrees of jurisdiction for the proper settlement of these cases. The author try to demonstrate that in order to ensure the celerity of the Romanian criminal trial, the latest legislative amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (by Law no. 202/2010) also lead to the reduction of the number of degrees of jurisdiction in most of the criminal cases, without this to affect, though, the application of principle of disclosure of truth. In order to achieve better results the analysis is based on survey, observation, comparison of various dispositions (Law no. 202/2010, the 1968 Criminal Procedure Code, the new Criminal Procedure Code) and systematization of the available doctrine in this area. The study may be of special interest to academics and members of the judiciary because it presents in detailed and clear the impact of some dispositions in Law no. 202/2010 and the provisions of the new Criminal Procedure Code in the matter of degrees of jurisdiction.http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/969/810celerity; degrees of jurisdiction; criminal case; legislative amendments; new Criminal Procedure Code
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anca-Lelia LORINCZ
spellingShingle Anca-Lelia LORINCZ
Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”
Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
celerity; degrees of jurisdiction; criminal case; legislative amendments; new Criminal Procedure Code
author_facet Anca-Lelia LORINCZ
author_sort Anca-Lelia LORINCZ
title Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”
title_short Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”
title_full Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”
title_fullStr Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Number of Degrees of Jurisdiction through the „Small Reform”
title_sort reduction of number of degrees of jurisdiction through the „small reform”
publisher Danubius University
series Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
issn 1844-8062
2065-3891
publishDate 2011-08-01
description This paper is dedicated to analysis the impact of some dispositions in Law no. 202/2010 regarding the degrees of jurisdiction in criminal cases. Although it is not expressly regulated by the Romanian Criminal Procedure Code, the celerity is required as fundamental principle of the criminal trial, assuming the requirement that the conduct of the criminal trial and the settlement of the criminal cases should take place as soon as possible. The principle of celerity is combined though with the fundamental principle of disclosure of truth in the criminal trial (Art.3 of the Criminal Procedure Code), requiring the insurance of a balance between the need to accelerate the procedures for settlement of the cases in a reasonable time and the need to run through more degrees of jurisdiction for the proper settlement of these cases. The author try to demonstrate that in order to ensure the celerity of the Romanian criminal trial, the latest legislative amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (by Law no. 202/2010) also lead to the reduction of the number of degrees of jurisdiction in most of the criminal cases, without this to affect, though, the application of principle of disclosure of truth. In order to achieve better results the analysis is based on survey, observation, comparison of various dispositions (Law no. 202/2010, the 1968 Criminal Procedure Code, the new Criminal Procedure Code) and systematization of the available doctrine in this area. The study may be of special interest to academics and members of the judiciary because it presents in detailed and clear the impact of some dispositions in Law no. 202/2010 and the provisions of the new Criminal Procedure Code in the matter of degrees of jurisdiction.
topic celerity; degrees of jurisdiction; criminal case; legislative amendments; new Criminal Procedure Code
url http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/969/810
work_keys_str_mv AT ancalelialorincz reductionofnumberofdegreesofjurisdictionthroughthesmallreform
_version_ 1716859559859978240