Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?

Autobiographical memory is fundamental to the process of self-construction. Therefore, the possibility of modifying autobiographical memories, in particular with memory-modulation and memory-erasing, is a very important topic both from the theoretical and from the practical point of view. The aim of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrea Lavazza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00469/full
id doaj-d4ea7c2bce3c4d3aa319a246642b194d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4ea7c2bce3c4d3aa319a246642b194d2020-11-24T21:30:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-04-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00469316189Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?Andrea LavazzaAutobiographical memory is fundamental to the process of self-construction. Therefore, the possibility of modifying autobiographical memories, in particular with memory-modulation and memory-erasing, is a very important topic both from the theoretical and from the practical point of view. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the state of the art of some of the most promising areas of memory-modulation and memory-erasing, considering how they can affect the self and the overall balance of the “self and autobiographical memory” system. Indeed, different conceptualizations of the self and of personal identity in relation to autobiographical memory are what makes memory-modulation and memory-erasing more or less desirable. Because of the current limitations (both practical and ethical) to interventions on memory, I can only sketch some hypotheses. However, it can be argued that the choice to mitigate painful memories (or edit memories for other reasons) is somehow problematic, from an ethical point of view, according to some of the theories of the self and personal identity in relation to autobiographical memory, in particular for the so-called narrative theories of personal identity, chosen here as the main case of study. Other conceptualizations of the “self and autobiographical memory” system, namely the constructivist theories, do not have this sort of critical concerns. However, many theories rely on normative (and not empirical) conceptions of the self: for them, the actions aimed at mitigating or removing specific (negative) memories can be seen either as an improvement or as a depletion or impairment of the self.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00469/fullmemory-erasingpropanololautobiographical memoryregulative conceptions of selfrigid identityextended identity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Lavazza
spellingShingle Andrea Lavazza
Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?
Frontiers in Psychology
memory-erasing
propanolol
autobiographical memory
regulative conceptions of self
rigid identity
extended identity
author_facet Andrea Lavazza
author_sort Andrea Lavazza
title Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?
title_short Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?
title_full Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?
title_fullStr Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?
title_full_unstemmed Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion?
title_sort memory-modulation: self-improvement or self-depletion?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Autobiographical memory is fundamental to the process of self-construction. Therefore, the possibility of modifying autobiographical memories, in particular with memory-modulation and memory-erasing, is a very important topic both from the theoretical and from the practical point of view. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the state of the art of some of the most promising areas of memory-modulation and memory-erasing, considering how they can affect the self and the overall balance of the “self and autobiographical memory” system. Indeed, different conceptualizations of the self and of personal identity in relation to autobiographical memory are what makes memory-modulation and memory-erasing more or less desirable. Because of the current limitations (both practical and ethical) to interventions on memory, I can only sketch some hypotheses. However, it can be argued that the choice to mitigate painful memories (or edit memories for other reasons) is somehow problematic, from an ethical point of view, according to some of the theories of the self and personal identity in relation to autobiographical memory, in particular for the so-called narrative theories of personal identity, chosen here as the main case of study. Other conceptualizations of the “self and autobiographical memory” system, namely the constructivist theories, do not have this sort of critical concerns. However, many theories rely on normative (and not empirical) conceptions of the self: for them, the actions aimed at mitigating or removing specific (negative) memories can be seen either as an improvement or as a depletion or impairment of the self.
topic memory-erasing
propanolol
autobiographical memory
regulative conceptions of self
rigid identity
extended identity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00469/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andrealavazza memorymodulationselfimprovementorselfdepletion
_version_ 1725961449827729408