Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
Pairs of eyewitnesses with a content-focused interaction style remember significantly more about witnessed incidents. We examined whether content-focused retrieval strategies can be taught. Seventy-five pairs of witnesses were interviewed thrice about an event. The first and third interview were con...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284/full |
id |
doaj-d4d73902686046cc996d57f21948daf2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d4d73902686046cc996d57f21948daf22020-11-24T23:16:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-03-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284338810Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness PairsAnnelies VredeveldtPeter J. van KoppenPairs of eyewitnesses with a content-focused interaction style remember significantly more about witnessed incidents. We examined whether content-focused retrieval strategies can be taught. Seventy-five pairs of witnesses were interviewed thrice about an event. The first and third interview were conducted individually for all witnesses. The second interview was individual, collaborative without instruction, or collaborative with instruction. Pairs in the latter condition were instructed to actively listen to and elaborate upon each other's contributions. The strategy instruction had no effect on retrieval strategies used, nor on the amount or accuracy of reported information. However, pairs who spontaneously adopted a content-focused interaction style during the collaborative interview remembered significantly more. Thus, our findings show that effective retrieval strategies cannot be taught, at least not with the current instructions. During the second interview, we observed collaborative inhibition and error pruning. When considering the total amount of information reported across the first two interviews, however, collaboration had no inhibitory effect on correct recall, yet the error pruning benefits remained. These findings suggest that investigative interviewers should interview witnesses separately first, and then interview pairs of witnesses collaboratively.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284/fulleyewitness memoryinvestigative interviewingcollaborative recallretrieval strategyconformity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Annelies Vredeveldt Peter J. van Koppen |
spellingShingle |
Annelies Vredeveldt Peter J. van Koppen Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs Frontiers in Psychology eyewitness memory investigative interviewing collaborative recall retrieval strategy conformity |
author_facet |
Annelies Vredeveldt Peter J. van Koppen |
author_sort |
Annelies Vredeveldt |
title |
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs |
title_short |
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs |
title_full |
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs |
title_fullStr |
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs |
title_sort |
recounting a common experience: on the effectiveness of instructing eyewitness pairs |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Pairs of eyewitnesses with a content-focused interaction style remember significantly more about witnessed incidents. We examined whether content-focused retrieval strategies can be taught. Seventy-five pairs of witnesses were interviewed thrice about an event. The first and third interview were conducted individually for all witnesses. The second interview was individual, collaborative without instruction, or collaborative with instruction. Pairs in the latter condition were instructed to actively listen to and elaborate upon each other's contributions. The strategy instruction had no effect on retrieval strategies used, nor on the amount or accuracy of reported information. However, pairs who spontaneously adopted a content-focused interaction style during the collaborative interview remembered significantly more. Thus, our findings show that effective retrieval strategies cannot be taught, at least not with the current instructions. During the second interview, we observed collaborative inhibition and error pruning. When considering the total amount of information reported across the first two interviews, however, collaboration had no inhibitory effect on correct recall, yet the error pruning benefits remained. These findings suggest that investigative interviewers should interview witnesses separately first, and then interview pairs of witnesses collaboratively. |
topic |
eyewitness memory investigative interviewing collaborative recall retrieval strategy conformity |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anneliesvredeveldt recountingacommonexperienceontheeffectivenessofinstructingeyewitnesspairs AT peterjvankoppen recountingacommonexperienceontheeffectivenessofinstructingeyewitnesspairs |
_version_ |
1725587784023932928 |