Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs

Pairs of eyewitnesses with a content-focused interaction style remember significantly more about witnessed incidents. We examined whether content-focused retrieval strategies can be taught. Seventy-five pairs of witnesses were interviewed thrice about an event. The first and third interview were con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annelies Vredeveldt, Peter J. van Koppen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284/full
id doaj-d4d73902686046cc996d57f21948daf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4d73902686046cc996d57f21948daf22020-11-24T23:16:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-03-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284338810Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness PairsAnnelies VredeveldtPeter J. van KoppenPairs of eyewitnesses with a content-focused interaction style remember significantly more about witnessed incidents. We examined whether content-focused retrieval strategies can be taught. Seventy-five pairs of witnesses were interviewed thrice about an event. The first and third interview were conducted individually for all witnesses. The second interview was individual, collaborative without instruction, or collaborative with instruction. Pairs in the latter condition were instructed to actively listen to and elaborate upon each other's contributions. The strategy instruction had no effect on retrieval strategies used, nor on the amount or accuracy of reported information. However, pairs who spontaneously adopted a content-focused interaction style during the collaborative interview remembered significantly more. Thus, our findings show that effective retrieval strategies cannot be taught, at least not with the current instructions. During the second interview, we observed collaborative inhibition and error pruning. When considering the total amount of information reported across the first two interviews, however, collaboration had no inhibitory effect on correct recall, yet the error pruning benefits remained. These findings suggest that investigative interviewers should interview witnesses separately first, and then interview pairs of witnesses collaboratively.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284/fulleyewitness memoryinvestigative interviewingcollaborative recallretrieval strategyconformity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annelies Vredeveldt
Peter J. van Koppen
spellingShingle Annelies Vredeveldt
Peter J. van Koppen
Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
Frontiers in Psychology
eyewitness memory
investigative interviewing
collaborative recall
retrieval strategy
conformity
author_facet Annelies Vredeveldt
Peter J. van Koppen
author_sort Annelies Vredeveldt
title Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
title_short Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
title_full Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
title_fullStr Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
title_full_unstemmed Recounting a Common Experience: On the Effectiveness of Instructing Eyewitness Pairs
title_sort recounting a common experience: on the effectiveness of instructing eyewitness pairs
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Pairs of eyewitnesses with a content-focused interaction style remember significantly more about witnessed incidents. We examined whether content-focused retrieval strategies can be taught. Seventy-five pairs of witnesses were interviewed thrice about an event. The first and third interview were conducted individually for all witnesses. The second interview was individual, collaborative without instruction, or collaborative with instruction. Pairs in the latter condition were instructed to actively listen to and elaborate upon each other's contributions. The strategy instruction had no effect on retrieval strategies used, nor on the amount or accuracy of reported information. However, pairs who spontaneously adopted a content-focused interaction style during the collaborative interview remembered significantly more. Thus, our findings show that effective retrieval strategies cannot be taught, at least not with the current instructions. During the second interview, we observed collaborative inhibition and error pruning. When considering the total amount of information reported across the first two interviews, however, collaboration had no inhibitory effect on correct recall, yet the error pruning benefits remained. These findings suggest that investigative interviewers should interview witnesses separately first, and then interview pairs of witnesses collaboratively.
topic eyewitness memory
investigative interviewing
collaborative recall
retrieval strategy
conformity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284/full
work_keys_str_mv AT anneliesvredeveldt recountingacommonexperienceontheeffectivenessofinstructingeyewitnesspairs
AT peterjvankoppen recountingacommonexperienceontheeffectivenessofinstructingeyewitnesspairs
_version_ 1725587784023932928