Rethinking Education for All

The rational for this paper is contextualized within a broader national and international agenda of reaching Education for All (EFA), knowledge transformation and production with an overall focus on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Whose education and whose development is at issue? The p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ellen Carm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/8/3447
id doaj-d4c5281815b446aa8fda6266271d2e3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4c5281815b446aa8fda6266271d2e3e2020-11-24T23:52:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502013-08-01583447347210.3390/su5083447Rethinking Education for AllEllen CarmThe rational for this paper is contextualized within a broader national and international agenda of reaching Education for All (EFA), knowledge transformation and production with an overall focus on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Whose education and whose development is at issue? The purpose of this paper is to reconceptualize EFA in a broader developmental context. Definitions of formal-, non-formal and informal education are applied in order to analyze the epistemological perspectives underlying the educational achievements more than two decades after Jomtien in 1990. Concepts of contextualized expansive education and   object-oriented learning will be used to reveal the systemic causes of the challenges the individual actors experience in their daily learning activities. Two case studies further illustrate how a broad stakeholder involvement through collective design and implementation created innovation and educational transformation that contributed to relevant and sustained learning/knowledge and development at an individual and community level. The paper argues that in the current sociocultural context, responses to EFA need to be based on a comprehensive national education strategy, situated in the local context. By creating space for educational innovation, through interaction and negotiation, the confluence of the epistemological lenses characterizing formal, non-formal, and informal learning could ultimately be a strategy to adequately respond to the diversified learning needs of the population and sustainable developmental of the country. One expected outcome of the paper is a contribution to the future strategies of EFA beyond 2015, built on the urgent requirements for inter-professional partnership and collaboration through a multidimensional approach to education and learning.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/8/3447Education for Alleducation and sustainable developmentformalnon-formalinformal educationtransformative educationrelevanceIndigenous and Western knowledgeexpansive learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ellen Carm
spellingShingle Ellen Carm
Rethinking Education for All
Sustainability
Education for All
education and sustainable development
formal
non-formal
informal education
transformative education
relevance
Indigenous and Western knowledge
expansive learning
author_facet Ellen Carm
author_sort Ellen Carm
title Rethinking Education for All
title_short Rethinking Education for All
title_full Rethinking Education for All
title_fullStr Rethinking Education for All
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Education for All
title_sort rethinking education for all
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2013-08-01
description The rational for this paper is contextualized within a broader national and international agenda of reaching Education for All (EFA), knowledge transformation and production with an overall focus on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Whose education and whose development is at issue? The purpose of this paper is to reconceptualize EFA in a broader developmental context. Definitions of formal-, non-formal and informal education are applied in order to analyze the epistemological perspectives underlying the educational achievements more than two decades after Jomtien in 1990. Concepts of contextualized expansive education and   object-oriented learning will be used to reveal the systemic causes of the challenges the individual actors experience in their daily learning activities. Two case studies further illustrate how a broad stakeholder involvement through collective design and implementation created innovation and educational transformation that contributed to relevant and sustained learning/knowledge and development at an individual and community level. The paper argues that in the current sociocultural context, responses to EFA need to be based on a comprehensive national education strategy, situated in the local context. By creating space for educational innovation, through interaction and negotiation, the confluence of the epistemological lenses characterizing formal, non-formal, and informal learning could ultimately be a strategy to adequately respond to the diversified learning needs of the population and sustainable developmental of the country. One expected outcome of the paper is a contribution to the future strategies of EFA beyond 2015, built on the urgent requirements for inter-professional partnership and collaboration through a multidimensional approach to education and learning.
topic Education for All
education and sustainable development
formal
non-formal
informal education
transformative education
relevance
Indigenous and Western knowledge
expansive learning
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/8/3447
work_keys_str_mv AT ellencarm rethinkingeducationforall
_version_ 1725472976820764672