A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography

<p><strong>Background</strong><strong>: </strong>Radiology in dentistry has a pivotal role in obtaining information for diagnostic. There is some radiographic examination often used to measure alveolar bone loss such as bitewing, periapical and panoramic. This study aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cek Dara Manja, M. Edwin Fransiari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: DiscoverSys 2018-10-01
Series:Bali Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/1191
id doaj-d4bd0e60e8ba414888c04a60f6aa4154
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4bd0e60e8ba414888c04a60f6aa41542020-11-25T03:51:06ZengDiscoverSysBali Medical Journal2089-11802302-29142018-10-017310.15562/bmj.v7i3.1191501A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiographyCek Dara Manja0M. Edwin Fransiari1Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera UtaraDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara<p><strong>Background</strong><strong>: </strong>Radiology in dentistry has a pivotal role in obtaining information for diagnostic. There is some radiographic examination often used to measure alveolar bone loss such as bitewing, periapical and panoramic. This study aims to determine the accuracy of bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography on the assessment of alveolar bone loss.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional analytic method was carried out to 11 samples using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography respectively. Data were analyzed by T-independent sample test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average mean value of alveolar bone loss measurement clinically in the skull was 2 mm, but 2.2 ± 0,36 mm, 2.3 ± 0.41 mm, and 2.6 ± 0.66 mm in the bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography respectively. The accuracy of bitewing radiographs had the highest percentage comparing with periapical and panoramic radiography (90%: 85%: 70% respectively). In addition, the study found there was no statistically different in among groups (P &gt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong><strong>: </strong>Bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiographic as a comparative assessment found no statistically different in the measurement of Alveolar Bone Loss.</p>https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/1191bitewing, periapical, panoramic, alveolar bone loss
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cek Dara Manja
M. Edwin Fransiari
spellingShingle Cek Dara Manja
M. Edwin Fransiari
A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
Bali Medical Journal
bitewing, periapical, panoramic, alveolar bone loss
author_facet Cek Dara Manja
M. Edwin Fransiari
author_sort Cek Dara Manja
title A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
title_short A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
title_full A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
title_fullStr A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
title_full_unstemmed A comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
title_sort comparative assessment of alveolar bone loss using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography
publisher DiscoverSys
series Bali Medical Journal
issn 2089-1180
2302-2914
publishDate 2018-10-01
description <p><strong>Background</strong><strong>: </strong>Radiology in dentistry has a pivotal role in obtaining information for diagnostic. There is some radiographic examination often used to measure alveolar bone loss such as bitewing, periapical and panoramic. This study aims to determine the accuracy of bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography on the assessment of alveolar bone loss.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional analytic method was carried out to 11 samples using bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography respectively. Data were analyzed by T-independent sample test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average mean value of alveolar bone loss measurement clinically in the skull was 2 mm, but 2.2 ± 0,36 mm, 2.3 ± 0.41 mm, and 2.6 ± 0.66 mm in the bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiography respectively. The accuracy of bitewing radiographs had the highest percentage comparing with periapical and panoramic radiography (90%: 85%: 70% respectively). In addition, the study found there was no statistically different in among groups (P &gt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong><strong>: </strong>Bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiographic as a comparative assessment found no statistically different in the measurement of Alveolar Bone Loss.</p>
topic bitewing, periapical, panoramic, alveolar bone loss
url https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/1191
work_keys_str_mv AT cekdaramanja acomparativeassessmentofalveolarbonelossusingbitewingperiapicalandpanoramicradiography
AT medwinfransiari acomparativeassessmentofalveolarbonelossusingbitewingperiapicalandpanoramicradiography
AT cekdaramanja comparativeassessmentofalveolarbonelossusingbitewingperiapicalandpanoramicradiography
AT medwinfransiari comparativeassessmentofalveolarbonelossusingbitewingperiapicalandpanoramicradiography
_version_ 1724488766813372416