Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
The Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals....
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Rehabilitation Research and Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841523 |
id |
doaj-d4a80ff338764ee4b57569fb5c2b0497 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d4a80ff338764ee4b57569fb5c2b04972020-11-25T00:52:44ZengHindawi LimitedRehabilitation Research and Practice2090-28672090-28752015-01-01201510.1155/2015/841523841523Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for ChildrenJane E. O’Brien0Helene M. Dumas1Franciscan Hospital for Children, 30 Warren Street, Boston, MA 02135, USAResearch Center for Children with Special Health Care Needs, Franciscan Hospital for Children, 30 Warren Street, Boston, MA 02135, USAThe Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals. Content validity was tested using an expert panel scoring the Content Validity Index (CVI). Concurrent validity was examined using clinician’s opinion of acuity at admission, the Complexity Index, and All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) codes. Predictive validity was examined with acute care readmission within 30 days. Interrater reliability was assessed using admission histories from closed cases. Content validity was established and concurrent validity was moderate to high with clinician opinion (rho = .76, p<.001), the Complexity Index (rho = .76, p<.001), and APR-DRGs (rho = .349, p=.001). Predictive validity was moderate (rho = .504, p=.005) and returns to acute care within 30 days. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92–0.90, p<.001). Experts agreed that the PAARC’s content is relevant, simple, and representative of the population. The PAARC measured well against indicators of medical complexity for pediatric outpatient care and medical record coding and was reliable between raters. This work supports proceeding with additional development and validity testing of the PAARC.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841523 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jane E. O’Brien Helene M. Dumas |
spellingShingle |
Jane E. O’Brien Helene M. Dumas Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children Rehabilitation Research and Practice |
author_facet |
Jane E. O’Brien Helene M. Dumas |
author_sort |
Jane E. O’Brien |
title |
Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children |
title_short |
Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children |
title_full |
Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children |
title_fullStr |
Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children |
title_sort |
development and initial psychometric evaluation of the post-acute acuity rating for children |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Rehabilitation Research and Practice |
issn |
2090-2867 2090-2875 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
The Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals. Content validity was tested using an expert panel scoring the Content Validity Index (CVI). Concurrent validity was examined using clinician’s opinion of acuity at admission, the Complexity Index, and All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) codes. Predictive validity was examined with acute care readmission within 30 days. Interrater reliability was assessed using admission histories from closed cases. Content validity was established and concurrent validity was moderate to high with clinician opinion (rho = .76, p<.001), the Complexity Index (rho = .76, p<.001), and APR-DRGs (rho = .349, p=.001). Predictive validity was moderate (rho = .504, p=.005) and returns to acute care within 30 days. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92–0.90, p<.001). Experts agreed that the PAARC’s content is relevant, simple, and representative of the population. The PAARC measured well against indicators of medical complexity for pediatric outpatient care and medical record coding and was reliable between raters. This work supports proceeding with additional development and validity testing of the PAARC. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841523 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janeeobrien developmentandinitialpsychometricevaluationofthepostacuteacuityratingforchildren AT helenemdumas developmentandinitialpsychometricevaluationofthepostacuteacuityratingforchildren |
_version_ |
1725240532006862848 |