Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children

The Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane E. O’Brien, Helene M. Dumas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841523
id doaj-d4a80ff338764ee4b57569fb5c2b0497
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4a80ff338764ee4b57569fb5c2b04972020-11-25T00:52:44ZengHindawi LimitedRehabilitation Research and Practice2090-28672090-28752015-01-01201510.1155/2015/841523841523Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for ChildrenJane E. O’Brien0Helene M. Dumas1Franciscan Hospital for Children, 30 Warren Street, Boston, MA 02135, USAResearch Center for Children with Special Health Care Needs, Franciscan Hospital for Children, 30 Warren Street, Boston, MA 02135, USAThe Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals. Content validity was tested using an expert panel scoring the Content Validity Index (CVI). Concurrent validity was examined using clinician’s opinion of acuity at admission, the Complexity Index, and All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) codes. Predictive validity was examined with acute care readmission within 30 days. Interrater reliability was assessed using admission histories from closed cases. Content validity was established and concurrent validity was moderate to high with clinician opinion (rho = .76, p<.001), the Complexity Index (rho = .76, p<.001), and APR-DRGs (rho = .349, p=.001). Predictive validity was moderate (rho = .504, p=.005) and returns to acute care within 30 days. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92–0.90, p<.001). Experts agreed that the PAARC’s content is relevant, simple, and representative of the population. The PAARC measured well against indicators of medical complexity for pediatric outpatient care and medical record coding and was reliable between raters. This work supports proceeding with additional development and validity testing of the PAARC.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841523
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jane E. O’Brien
Helene M. Dumas
spellingShingle Jane E. O’Brien
Helene M. Dumas
Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
author_facet Jane E. O’Brien
Helene M. Dumas
author_sort Jane E. O’Brien
title Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
title_short Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
title_full Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
title_fullStr Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
title_full_unstemmed Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children
title_sort development and initial psychometric evaluation of the post-acute acuity rating for children
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Rehabilitation Research and Practice
issn 2090-2867
2090-2875
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The Post-Acute Acuity Rating for Children (PAARC) is the first known acuity rating intended to reflect medical severity based on age, reason for admission, diagnoses, dependence in activities of daily living, and technology reliance for children admitted to post-acute care rehabilitation hospitals. Content validity was tested using an expert panel scoring the Content Validity Index (CVI). Concurrent validity was examined using clinician’s opinion of acuity at admission, the Complexity Index, and All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) codes. Predictive validity was examined with acute care readmission within 30 days. Interrater reliability was assessed using admission histories from closed cases. Content validity was established and concurrent validity was moderate to high with clinician opinion (rho = .76, p<.001), the Complexity Index (rho = .76, p<.001), and APR-DRGs (rho = .349, p=.001). Predictive validity was moderate (rho = .504, p=.005) and returns to acute care within 30 days. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92–0.90, p<.001). Experts agreed that the PAARC’s content is relevant, simple, and representative of the population. The PAARC measured well against indicators of medical complexity for pediatric outpatient care and medical record coding and was reliable between raters. This work supports proceeding with additional development and validity testing of the PAARC.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841523
work_keys_str_mv AT janeeobrien developmentandinitialpsychometricevaluationofthepostacuteacuityratingforchildren
AT helenemdumas developmentandinitialpsychometricevaluationofthepostacuteacuityratingforchildren
_version_ 1725240532006862848