Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013

Coronal mass ejection (CME)-shock compression of the dayside magnetopause has been observed to cause both prompt enhancement of radiation belt electron flux due to inward radial transport of electrons conserving their first adiabatic invariant and prompt losses which at times entirely elimi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Paral, M. K. Hudson, B. T. Kress, M. J. Wiltberger, J. R. Wygant, H. J. Singer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-08-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/33/1037/2015/angeo-33-1037-2015.pdf
id doaj-d4842b5630e94813839aab34a67a8a66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4842b5630e94813839aab34a67a8a662020-11-24T20:59:42ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762015-08-01331037105010.5194/angeo-33-1037-2015Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013J. Paral0J. Paral1M. K. Hudson2B. T. Kress3M. J. Wiltberger4J. R. Wygant5H. J. Singer6Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USAHigh Altitude Observatory, NCAR, Boulder, CO, USADepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USAHigh Altitude Observatory, NCAR, Boulder, CO, USADepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USANOAA Space Weather Prediction Center, Boulder, CO, USACoronal mass ejection (CME)-shock compression of the dayside magnetopause has been observed to cause both prompt enhancement of radiation belt electron flux due to inward radial transport of electrons conserving their first adiabatic invariant and prompt losses which at times entirely eliminate the outer zone. Recent numerical studies suggest that enhanced ultra-low frequency (ULF) wave activity is necessary to explain electron losses deeper inside the magnetosphere than magnetopause incursion following CME-shock arrival. A combination of radial transport and magnetopause shadowing can account for losses observed at radial distances into <i>L</i> = 4.5, well within the computed magnetopause location. We compare ULF wave power from the Electric Field and Waves (EFW) electric field instrument on the Van Allen Probes for the 8 October 2013 storm with ULF wave power simulated using the Lyon–Fedder–Mobarry (LFM) global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) magnetospheric simulation code coupled to the Rice Convection Model (RCM). Two other storms with strong magnetopause compression, 8–9 October 2012 and 17–18 March 2013, are also examined. We show that the global MHD model captures the azimuthal magnetosonic impulse propagation speed and amplitude observed by the Van Allen Probes which is responsible for prompt acceleration at MeV energies reported for the 8 October 2013 storm. The simulation also captures the ULF wave power in the azimuthal component of the electric field, responsible for acceleration and radial transport of electrons, at frequencies comparable to the electron drift period. This electric field impulse has been shown to explain observations in related studies (Foster et al., 2015) of electron acceleration and drift phase bunching by the Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma Suite (ECT) instrument on the Van Allen Probes.https://www.ann-geophys.net/33/1037/2015/angeo-33-1037-2015.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Paral
J. Paral
M. K. Hudson
B. T. Kress
M. J. Wiltberger
J. R. Wygant
H. J. Singer
spellingShingle J. Paral
J. Paral
M. K. Hudson
B. T. Kress
M. J. Wiltberger
J. R. Wygant
H. J. Singer
Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet J. Paral
J. Paral
M. K. Hudson
B. T. Kress
M. J. Wiltberger
J. R. Wygant
H. J. Singer
author_sort J. Paral
title Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013
title_short Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013
title_full Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013
title_fullStr Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013
title_full_unstemmed Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three Van Allen Probes storms in 2012 and 2013
title_sort magnetohydrodynamic modeling of three van allen probes storms in 2012 and 2013
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Coronal mass ejection (CME)-shock compression of the dayside magnetopause has been observed to cause both prompt enhancement of radiation belt electron flux due to inward radial transport of electrons conserving their first adiabatic invariant and prompt losses which at times entirely eliminate the outer zone. Recent numerical studies suggest that enhanced ultra-low frequency (ULF) wave activity is necessary to explain electron losses deeper inside the magnetosphere than magnetopause incursion following CME-shock arrival. A combination of radial transport and magnetopause shadowing can account for losses observed at radial distances into <i>L</i> = 4.5, well within the computed magnetopause location. We compare ULF wave power from the Electric Field and Waves (EFW) electric field instrument on the Van Allen Probes for the 8 October 2013 storm with ULF wave power simulated using the Lyon–Fedder–Mobarry (LFM) global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) magnetospheric simulation code coupled to the Rice Convection Model (RCM). Two other storms with strong magnetopause compression, 8–9 October 2012 and 17–18 March 2013, are also examined. We show that the global MHD model captures the azimuthal magnetosonic impulse propagation speed and amplitude observed by the Van Allen Probes which is responsible for prompt acceleration at MeV energies reported for the 8 October 2013 storm. The simulation also captures the ULF wave power in the azimuthal component of the electric field, responsible for acceleration and radial transport of electrons, at frequencies comparable to the electron drift period. This electric field impulse has been shown to explain observations in related studies (Foster et al., 2015) of electron acceleration and drift phase bunching by the Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma Suite (ECT) instrument on the Van Allen Probes.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/33/1037/2015/angeo-33-1037-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jparal magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
AT jparal magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
AT mkhudson magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
AT btkress magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
AT mjwiltberger magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
AT jrwygant magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
AT hjsinger magnetohydrodynamicmodelingofthreevanallenprobesstormsin2012and2013
_version_ 1716781832281784320