PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation.
OBJECTIVE:To compare the accuracy of a semi-quantitative proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermal mapping interface and an alternative qualitative T1 thermometry model in predicting tissue necrosis in an established routine setting of MRI-guided laser ablation in the human liver. MATERIALS AN...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3813475?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-d47fd50aa5474813876565f6b91b30b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d47fd50aa5474813876565f6b91b30b82020-11-25T00:24:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01810e7855910.1371/journal.pone.0078559PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation.Christian RosenbergAntje KickhefelBirger MenselTilman PickartzRalf PulsJoerg RolandNorbert HostenOBJECTIVE:To compare the accuracy of a semi-quantitative proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermal mapping interface and an alternative qualitative T1 thermometry model in predicting tissue necrosis in an established routine setting of MRI-guided laser ablation in the human liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS:34 cases of PRFS-guided (GRE) laser ablation were retrospectively matched with 34 cases from an earlier patient population of 73 individuals being monitored through T1 magnitude image evaluation (FLASH 2D). The model-specific real-time estimation of necrotizing thermal impact (above 54 °C zone and T1 signal loss, respectively) was correlated in size with the resulting necrosis as shown by lack of enhancement on the first-day contrast exam (T1). Matched groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS:Online PRFS guidance was available in 33 of 34 cases. Positive size correlation between calculated impact zone and contrast defect at first day was evident in both groups (p < 0.0004). The predictive error estimating necrosis was median 21% (range 1 %-52%) in the PRFS group and 61 % (range 22-84%) in the T1 magnitude group. Differences in estimating lethal impact were significant (p = 0.004), whereas the real extent of therapy-induced necrosis showed no significant difference (p > 0.28) between the two groups. CONCLUSION:PRFS thermometry is feasible in a clinical setting of thermal hepatic tumor ablation. As an interference-free MR-tool for online therapy monitoring its accuracy to predict tissue necrosis is superior to a competing model of thermally induced alteration of the T1 magnitude signal.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3813475?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christian Rosenberg Antje Kickhefel Birger Mensel Tilman Pickartz Ralf Puls Joerg Roland Norbert Hosten |
spellingShingle |
Christian Rosenberg Antje Kickhefel Birger Mensel Tilman Pickartz Ralf Puls Joerg Roland Norbert Hosten PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Christian Rosenberg Antje Kickhefel Birger Mensel Tilman Pickartz Ralf Puls Joerg Roland Norbert Hosten |
author_sort |
Christian Rosenberg |
title |
PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. |
title_short |
PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. |
title_full |
PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. |
title_fullStr |
PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. |
title_full_unstemmed |
PRFS-based MR thermometry versus an alternative T1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. |
title_sort |
prfs-based mr thermometry versus an alternative t1 magnitude method--comparative performance predicting thermally induced necrosis in hepatic tumor ablation. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
OBJECTIVE:To compare the accuracy of a semi-quantitative proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermal mapping interface and an alternative qualitative T1 thermometry model in predicting tissue necrosis in an established routine setting of MRI-guided laser ablation in the human liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS:34 cases of PRFS-guided (GRE) laser ablation were retrospectively matched with 34 cases from an earlier patient population of 73 individuals being monitored through T1 magnitude image evaluation (FLASH 2D). The model-specific real-time estimation of necrotizing thermal impact (above 54 °C zone and T1 signal loss, respectively) was correlated in size with the resulting necrosis as shown by lack of enhancement on the first-day contrast exam (T1). Matched groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS:Online PRFS guidance was available in 33 of 34 cases. Positive size correlation between calculated impact zone and contrast defect at first day was evident in both groups (p < 0.0004). The predictive error estimating necrosis was median 21% (range 1 %-52%) in the PRFS group and 61 % (range 22-84%) in the T1 magnitude group. Differences in estimating lethal impact were significant (p = 0.004), whereas the real extent of therapy-induced necrosis showed no significant difference (p > 0.28) between the two groups. CONCLUSION:PRFS thermometry is feasible in a clinical setting of thermal hepatic tumor ablation. As an interference-free MR-tool for online therapy monitoring its accuracy to predict tissue necrosis is superior to a competing model of thermally induced alteration of the T1 magnitude signal. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3813475?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christianrosenberg prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation AT antjekickhefel prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation AT birgermensel prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation AT tilmanpickartz prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation AT ralfpuls prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation AT joergroland prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation AT norberthosten prfsbasedmrthermometryversusanalternativet1magnitudemethodcomparativeperformancepredictingthermallyinducednecrosisinhepatictumorablation |
_version_ |
1725352468854865920 |