Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
<b>AIM:</b> To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops.<b>METHODS:</b>Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
2013-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Ophthalmology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874519/ |
id |
doaj-d47549e3a72f49b49999a87a7d494a0e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d47549e3a72f49b49999a87a7d494a0e2020-11-24T22:29:45ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982013-12-0166801 804 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.11 Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri 0Patricia Fernández-Robredo 1Elisa de Nova 2Elvira Bonet-Farriol 3Alfonso L. Sabater 4Javier Zarranz-Ventura 5Josemaria Caire 6Luis M. Sádaba 7Angel Salinas-Alamán 8Alfredo García-Layana 9Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain <b>AIM:</b> To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops.<b>METHODS:</b>Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from 40 outpatient-clinic patients were analyzed. PT drops were applied to the right eye, and a MY device was inserted in the left eye for 30min. Time until maximal pupil dilation for each eye was then assessed. In the second study, 80 eyes from 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery were analyzed. Pupil dilation was achieved using either PT drops three-times for one hour prior to surgery (40 patients), or a MY device was inserted one hour prior to surgery (40 patients).<b>RESULTS:</b> In the first study, MY achieved superior mydriasis compared to PT eye drops at 90min (9.04±1.33mm <i>vs</i> 8.78±1.37mm, <i>P</i>=0.012). However MY took longer than PT drops to achieve maximal dilation, and mydriasis was inferior in eyes with MY compared to PT drops at 30min (7.21±1.73mm <i>vs</i> 8.22±1.43mm, <i>P</i><0.001), the two groups only becoming similar by 60min (8.85±1.44mm <i>vs</i> 8.71±1.27mm, <i>P</i>=0.236). In the second study, both MY and PT achieved similar levels of mydriasis at the beginning of surgery (8.75±0.76mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.77±0.63mm with PT), and also at the end of surgery (7.96±1.06mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.32±0.72mm with PT), with no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i>=0.08). MY was well tolerated and cardiovascular effects were not influenced by dilation method.<b>CONLUSION:</b> MY could be a safe and efficacious alternative for mydriasis. The mydriatic effect of MY is as good as conventional PT eye drops after 60min, and is superior after 90min. MY also maintains good pupil dilation during cataract surgery. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874519/ Mydriasert®mydriasispupil dilationcataract surgerydevice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri Patricia Fernández-Robredo Elisa de Nova Elvira Bonet-Farriol Alfonso L. Sabater Javier Zarranz-Ventura Josemaria Caire Luis M. Sádaba Angel Salinas-Alamán Alfredo García-Layana |
spellingShingle |
Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri Patricia Fernández-Robredo Elisa de Nova Elvira Bonet-Farriol Alfonso L. Sabater Javier Zarranz-Ventura Josemaria Caire Luis M. Sádaba Angel Salinas-Alamán Alfredo García-Layana Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops International Journal of Ophthalmology Mydriasert® mydriasis pupil dilation cataract surgery device |
author_facet |
Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri Patricia Fernández-Robredo Elisa de Nova Elvira Bonet-Farriol Alfonso L. Sabater Javier Zarranz-Ventura Josemaria Caire Luis M. Sádaba Angel Salinas-Alamán Alfredo García-Layana |
author_sort |
Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri |
title |
Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops |
title_short |
Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops |
title_full |
Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops |
title_sort |
comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops |
publisher |
Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) |
series |
International Journal of Ophthalmology |
issn |
2222-3959 2227-4898 |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
<b>AIM:</b> To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops.<b>METHODS:</b>Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from 40 outpatient-clinic patients were analyzed. PT drops were applied to the right eye, and a MY device was inserted in the left eye for 30min. Time until maximal pupil dilation for each eye was then assessed. In the second study, 80 eyes from 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery were analyzed. Pupil dilation was achieved using either PT drops three-times for one hour prior to surgery (40 patients), or a MY device was inserted one hour prior to surgery (40 patients).<b>RESULTS:</b> In the first study, MY achieved superior mydriasis compared to PT eye drops at 90min (9.04±1.33mm <i>vs</i> 8.78±1.37mm, <i>P</i>=0.012). However MY took longer than PT drops to achieve maximal dilation, and mydriasis was inferior in eyes with MY compared to PT drops at 30min (7.21±1.73mm <i>vs</i> 8.22±1.43mm, <i>P</i><0.001), the two groups only becoming similar by 60min (8.85±1.44mm <i>vs</i> 8.71±1.27mm, <i>P</i>=0.236). In the second study, both MY and PT achieved similar levels of mydriasis at the beginning of surgery (8.75±0.76mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.77±0.63mm with PT), and also at the end of surgery (7.96±1.06mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.32±0.72mm with PT), with no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i>=0.08). MY was well tolerated and cardiovascular effects were not influenced by dilation method.<b>CONLUSION:</b> MY could be a safe and efficacious alternative for mydriasis. The mydriatic effect of MY is as good as conventional PT eye drops after 60min, and is superior after 90min. MY also maintains good pupil dilation during cataract surgery.
|
topic |
Mydriasert® mydriasis pupil dilation cataract surgery device |
url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874519/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manuelsaenzdeviteri comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT patriciafernandezrobredo comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT elisadenova comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT elvirabonetfarriol comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT alfonsolsabater comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT javierzarranzventura comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT josemariacaire comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT luismsadaba comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT angelsalinasalaman comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops AT alfredogarcialayana comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops |
_version_ |
1725743399923875840 |