Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops

<b>AIM:</b> To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops.<b>METHODS:</b>Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri, Patricia Fernández-Robredo, Elisa de Nova, Elvira Bonet-Farriol, Alfonso L. Sabater, Javier Zarranz-Ventura, Josemaria Caire, Luis M. Sádaba, Angel Salinas-Alamán, Alfredo García-Layana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2013-12-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874519/
id doaj-d47549e3a72f49b49999a87a7d494a0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d47549e3a72f49b49999a87a7d494a0e2020-11-24T22:29:45ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982013-12-0166801 804 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.11 Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri 0Patricia Fernández-Robredo 1Elisa de Nova 2Elvira Bonet-Farriol 3Alfonso L. Sabater 4Javier Zarranz-Ventura 5Josemaria Caire 6Luis M. Sádaba 7Angel Salinas-Alamán 8Alfredo García-Layana 9Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain Department of Ophthalmology, University of Navarra, 36th Pio XII Ave, Pamplona 31008, Spain <b>AIM:</b> To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops.<b>METHODS:</b>Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from 40 outpatient-clinic patients were analyzed. PT drops were applied to the right eye, and a MY device was inserted in the left eye for 30min. Time until maximal pupil dilation for each eye was then assessed. In the second study, 80 eyes from 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery were analyzed. Pupil dilation was achieved using either PT drops three-times for one hour prior to surgery (40 patients), or a MY device was inserted one hour prior to surgery (40 patients).<b>RESULTS:</b> In the first study, MY achieved superior mydriasis compared to PT eye drops at 90min (9.04±1.33mm <i>vs</i> 8.78±1.37mm, <i>P</i>=0.012). However MY took longer than PT drops to achieve maximal dilation, and mydriasis was inferior in eyes with MY compared to PT drops at 30min (7.21±1.73mm <i>vs</i> 8.22±1.43mm, <i>P</i>&lt;0.001), the two groups only becoming similar by 60min (8.85±1.44mm <i>vs</i> 8.71±1.27mm, <i>P</i>=0.236). In the second study, both MY and PT achieved similar levels of mydriasis at the beginning of surgery (8.75±0.76mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.77±0.63mm with PT), and also at the end of surgery (7.96±1.06mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.32±0.72mm with PT), with no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i>=0.08). MY was well tolerated and cardiovascular effects were not influenced by dilation method.<b>CONLUSION:</b> MY could be a safe and efficacious alternative for mydriasis. The mydriatic effect of MY is as good as conventional PT eye drops after 60min, and is superior after 90min. MY also maintains good pupil dilation during cataract surgery. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874519/ Mydriasert®mydriasispupil dilationcataract surgerydevice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri
Patricia Fernández-Robredo
Elisa de Nova
Elvira Bonet-Farriol
Alfonso L. Sabater
Javier Zarranz-Ventura
Josemaria Caire
Luis M. Sádaba
Angel Salinas-Alamán
Alfredo García-Layana
spellingShingle Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri
Patricia Fernández-Robredo
Elisa de Nova
Elvira Bonet-Farriol
Alfonso L. Sabater
Javier Zarranz-Ventura
Josemaria Caire
Luis M. Sádaba
Angel Salinas-Alamán
Alfredo García-Layana
Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Mydriasert®
mydriasis
pupil dilation
cataract surgery
device
author_facet Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri
Patricia Fernández-Robredo
Elisa de Nova
Elvira Bonet-Farriol
Alfonso L. Sabater
Javier Zarranz-Ventura
Josemaria Caire
Luis M. Sádaba
Angel Salinas-Alamán
Alfredo García-Layana
author_sort Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri
title Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
title_short Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
title_full Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
title_fullStr Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (Mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
title_sort comparative study measuring the dilatory effect of a mydriatic device (mydriasert</b><sup><b>®</b></sup><b>) versus topical drops
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
publishDate 2013-12-01
description <b>AIM:</b> To compare the mydriatic efficacy of an ophthalmic insert (Mydriasert, MY) versus phenylephrine and tropicamide (PT) eye drops.<b>METHODS:</b>Two controlled, prospective, randomized, single-blind studies were performed. In the first study, a total of 80 eyes from 40 outpatient-clinic patients were analyzed. PT drops were applied to the right eye, and a MY device was inserted in the left eye for 30min. Time until maximal pupil dilation for each eye was then assessed. In the second study, 80 eyes from 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery were analyzed. Pupil dilation was achieved using either PT drops three-times for one hour prior to surgery (40 patients), or a MY device was inserted one hour prior to surgery (40 patients).<b>RESULTS:</b> In the first study, MY achieved superior mydriasis compared to PT eye drops at 90min (9.04±1.33mm <i>vs</i> 8.78±1.37mm, <i>P</i>=0.012). However MY took longer than PT drops to achieve maximal dilation, and mydriasis was inferior in eyes with MY compared to PT drops at 30min (7.21±1.73mm <i>vs</i> 8.22±1.43mm, <i>P</i>&lt;0.001), the two groups only becoming similar by 60min (8.85±1.44mm <i>vs</i> 8.71±1.27mm, <i>P</i>=0.236). In the second study, both MY and PT achieved similar levels of mydriasis at the beginning of surgery (8.75±0.76mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.77±0.63mm with PT), and also at the end of surgery (7.96±1.06mm with MY <i>vs</i> 8.32±0.72mm with PT), with no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i>=0.08). MY was well tolerated and cardiovascular effects were not influenced by dilation method.<b>CONLUSION:</b> MY could be a safe and efficacious alternative for mydriasis. The mydriatic effect of MY is as good as conventional PT eye drops after 60min, and is superior after 90min. MY also maintains good pupil dilation during cataract surgery.
topic Mydriasert®
mydriasis
pupil dilation
cataract surgery
device
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874519/
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelsaenzdeviteri comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT patriciafernandezrobredo comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT elisadenova comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT elvirabonetfarriol comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT alfonsolsabater comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT javierzarranzventura comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT josemariacaire comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT luismsadaba comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT angelsalinasalaman comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
AT alfredogarcialayana comparativestudymeasuringthedilatoryeffectofamydriaticdevicemydriasertbsupbbsupbversustopicaldrops
_version_ 1725743399923875840