Migrația și satul

In the present study we have tried an detailed analyse of the evolution of internal and temporary outmigration, during the last four decades. It was found at least six different migration stages. The second part of article focalise on participation of rural population in process of migration, betwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ioana Petre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Expert Projects 2005-12-01
Series:Sociologie Românească
Online Access:https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/792
id doaj-d471ae96d49c4468b5a342e7d9da5b44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d471ae96d49c4468b5a342e7d9da5b442020-11-25T03:22:11ZengExpert ProjectsSociologie Românească1220-53892668-14552005-12-0134Migrația și satulIoana Petre0Institute of Sociology Dimitrie Gusti, Romanian Academy In the present study we have tried an detailed analyse of the evolution of internal and temporary outmigration, during the last four decades. It was found at least six different migration stages. The second part of article focalise on participation of rural population in process of migration, between 1968-2004, more precisely on main characteristics of postdecember evolution of internal and external migration implying rural area. We mean by that, primary, the spectaculare growing of urban-rural migration, special by retromigration [the coming back in the countryside of those who had gone away two or three decades ago] and a significant growing of outmigration on economic purpose. Both types of migration are consequences of quasi general crises the Romanian communities are confronted with. The impact of this phenomenon on the potential of development of the villages ist different: a) retromigration, by negative selection that it implies, contributes to the degradation of the human rural capital; b) the temporary outmigration on economic purpose leads to an individual and family prosperity, but not to social prosperity, for now anyway. We think that, by a different approach of the money comig into the country, brought by external migrants. These money could be use also in order to contribute to the economical devellopment of the villages, primary by the implementation of some working units as a result of the cooperation between migratory people and the local or/and national authorities. https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/792
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ioana Petre
spellingShingle Ioana Petre
Migrația și satul
Sociologie Românească
author_facet Ioana Petre
author_sort Ioana Petre
title Migrația și satul
title_short Migrația și satul
title_full Migrația și satul
title_fullStr Migrația și satul
title_full_unstemmed Migrația și satul
title_sort migrația și satul
publisher Expert Projects
series Sociologie Românească
issn 1220-5389
2668-1455
publishDate 2005-12-01
description In the present study we have tried an detailed analyse of the evolution of internal and temporary outmigration, during the last four decades. It was found at least six different migration stages. The second part of article focalise on participation of rural population in process of migration, between 1968-2004, more precisely on main characteristics of postdecember evolution of internal and external migration implying rural area. We mean by that, primary, the spectaculare growing of urban-rural migration, special by retromigration [the coming back in the countryside of those who had gone away two or three decades ago] and a significant growing of outmigration on economic purpose. Both types of migration are consequences of quasi general crises the Romanian communities are confronted with. The impact of this phenomenon on the potential of development of the villages ist different: a) retromigration, by negative selection that it implies, contributes to the degradation of the human rural capital; b) the temporary outmigration on economic purpose leads to an individual and family prosperity, but not to social prosperity, for now anyway. We think that, by a different approach of the money comig into the country, brought by external migrants. These money could be use also in order to contribute to the economical devellopment of the villages, primary by the implementation of some working units as a result of the cooperation between migratory people and the local or/and national authorities.
url https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/792
work_keys_str_mv AT ioanapetre migratiasisatul
_version_ 1724610741863972864