Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol

Abstract Background Even though data suggest that palliative care (PC) improves patient quality of life, caregiver burden, cost, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, integration of PC in the ICU is far from being universally accepted. Poor understanding of what PC provides is one of the bar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victoria Metaxa, Despina Anagnostou, Savvas Vlachos, Nishkantha Arulkumaran, Ingeborg van Dusseldorp, Sherihane Bensemmane, Rebecca Aslakson, Judy E. Davidson, Rik Gerritsen, Christiane Hartog, Randall Curtis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-1064-y
id doaj-d45ea7ff8d5948ed8e83f3a2b737e930
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d45ea7ff8d5948ed8e83f3a2b737e9302020-11-25T02:25:04ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532019-06-01811510.1186/s13643-019-1064-yPalliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocolVictoria Metaxa0Despina Anagnostou1Savvas Vlachos2Nishkantha Arulkumaran3Ingeborg van Dusseldorp4Sherihane Bensemmane5Rebecca Aslakson6Judy E. Davidson7Rik Gerritsen8Christiane Hartog9Randall Curtis10King’s College HospitalHuman Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityKing’s College HospitalBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College LondonMedical Information Specialist, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, MCL AcademyEuropean Society of Intensive Care MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Palliative Care Section, Stanford UniversityDepartment of Nursing, University of California San Diego HealthCentrum voor Intensive care, Medisch Centrum LeeuwardenDepartment for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University HospitalCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of WashingtonAbstract Background Even though data suggest that palliative care (PC) improves patient quality of life, caregiver burden, cost, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, integration of PC in the ICU is far from being universally accepted. Poor understanding of what PC provides is one of the barriers to the widespread implementation of their services in ICU. Evidence suggests that the availability of specialist PC is lacking in most European countries and provided differently depending on geographical location. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the numbers and types of PC interventions and gauge their impact on stakeholder outcomes and ICU resource utilisation. Methods We will undertake a systematic review of the published peer-reviewed journal articles; our search will be carried out MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The search strategy will include variations in the term ‘palliative care’ and ‘intensive care’. All studies with patient populations undergoing palliative care interventions will be selected. Only full-text articles will be considered, and conference abstracts excluded. There will be no date restrictions on the year of publications or on language. The primary aim of the present study is to compare the numbers and types of PC interventions in ICU and their impact on stakeholder (patient, family, clinician, other) outcomes. Reporting of findings will follow the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Discussion This review will provide insight into the implementation of palliative care in ICU, elucidate differences between countries and health systems, reveal most effective models, and contribute to identifying research priorities to improve outcomes. Systematic review registration International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews PROSPERO (CRD42018094315)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-1064-yPalliative careIntensive careEnd-of-life care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victoria Metaxa
Despina Anagnostou
Savvas Vlachos
Nishkantha Arulkumaran
Ingeborg van Dusseldorp
Sherihane Bensemmane
Rebecca Aslakson
Judy E. Davidson
Rik Gerritsen
Christiane Hartog
Randall Curtis
spellingShingle Victoria Metaxa
Despina Anagnostou
Savvas Vlachos
Nishkantha Arulkumaran
Ingeborg van Dusseldorp
Sherihane Bensemmane
Rebecca Aslakson
Judy E. Davidson
Rik Gerritsen
Christiane Hartog
Randall Curtis
Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
Systematic Reviews
Palliative care
Intensive care
End-of-life care
author_facet Victoria Metaxa
Despina Anagnostou
Savvas Vlachos
Nishkantha Arulkumaran
Ingeborg van Dusseldorp
Sherihane Bensemmane
Rebecca Aslakson
Judy E. Davidson
Rik Gerritsen
Christiane Hartog
Randall Curtis
author_sort Victoria Metaxa
title Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
title_short Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
title_full Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
title_sort palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients – a systematic review protocol
publisher BMC
series Systematic Reviews
issn 2046-4053
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Even though data suggest that palliative care (PC) improves patient quality of life, caregiver burden, cost, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, integration of PC in the ICU is far from being universally accepted. Poor understanding of what PC provides is one of the barriers to the widespread implementation of their services in ICU. Evidence suggests that the availability of specialist PC is lacking in most European countries and provided differently depending on geographical location. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the numbers and types of PC interventions and gauge their impact on stakeholder outcomes and ICU resource utilisation. Methods We will undertake a systematic review of the published peer-reviewed journal articles; our search will be carried out MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The search strategy will include variations in the term ‘palliative care’ and ‘intensive care’. All studies with patient populations undergoing palliative care interventions will be selected. Only full-text articles will be considered, and conference abstracts excluded. There will be no date restrictions on the year of publications or on language. The primary aim of the present study is to compare the numbers and types of PC interventions in ICU and their impact on stakeholder (patient, family, clinician, other) outcomes. Reporting of findings will follow the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Discussion This review will provide insight into the implementation of palliative care in ICU, elucidate differences between countries and health systems, reveal most effective models, and contribute to identifying research priorities to improve outcomes. Systematic review registration International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews PROSPERO (CRD42018094315)
topic Palliative care
Intensive care
End-of-life care
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-1064-y
work_keys_str_mv AT victoriametaxa palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT despinaanagnostou palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT savvasvlachos palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT nishkanthaarulkumaran palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ingeborgvandusseldorp palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT sherihanebensemmane palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT rebeccaaslakson palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT judyedavidson palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT rikgerritsen palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT christianehartog palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT randallcurtis palliativecareinterventionsinintensivecareunitpatientsasystematicreviewprotocol
_version_ 1724852915839959040