Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland
Energy transitions around the world will change the spatial fingerprint of the electricity sector, but there is a lack of studies on citizen preferences for siting the future mix of electricity technologies. Using the case of Switzerland in 2035, we present a serious board game to form and elicit ci...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4961 |
id |
doaj-d452f54dbef444a8851bc80bf54648b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d452f54dbef444a8851bc80bf54648b52020-11-25T02:51:49ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-09-01134961496110.3390/en13184961Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in SwitzerlandFranziska Steinberger0Tobias Minder1Evelina Trutnevyte2Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandEnergy transitions around the world will change the spatial fingerprint of the electricity sector, but there is a lack of studies on citizen preferences for siting the future mix of electricity technologies. Using the case of Switzerland in 2035, we present a serious board game to form and elicit citizen preferences for spatial siting of a full mix of electricity technologies and we test this game with 44 participants in the city of Zurich. The game proves to help elicit valid preferences of the participants and lead to measurable learning effects about this complex, multi-dimensional topic. The results show that these 44 participants prefer a diverse mix of renewable technologies for Switzerland in 2035. In terms of siting, these participants consistently choose the efficiency strategy, where new plants are concentrated in the areas where they produce most electricity at least cost, in contrast to the strategy of regional equity, where all Swiss regions would equally build new generation and share the benefits and burdens of the energy transition.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4961electricity mixrenewable energyequityspatial planningparticipatory planningpublic preferences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Franziska Steinberger Tobias Minder Evelina Trutnevyte |
spellingShingle |
Franziska Steinberger Tobias Minder Evelina Trutnevyte Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland Energies electricity mix renewable energy equity spatial planning participatory planning public preferences |
author_facet |
Franziska Steinberger Tobias Minder Evelina Trutnevyte |
author_sort |
Franziska Steinberger |
title |
Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland |
title_short |
Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland |
title_full |
Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland |
title_fullStr |
Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficiency versus Equity in Spatial Siting of Electricity Generation: Citizen Preferences in a Serious Board Game in Switzerland |
title_sort |
efficiency versus equity in spatial siting of electricity generation: citizen preferences in a serious board game in switzerland |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Energy transitions around the world will change the spatial fingerprint of the electricity sector, but there is a lack of studies on citizen preferences for siting the future mix of electricity technologies. Using the case of Switzerland in 2035, we present a serious board game to form and elicit citizen preferences for spatial siting of a full mix of electricity technologies and we test this game with 44 participants in the city of Zurich. The game proves to help elicit valid preferences of the participants and lead to measurable learning effects about this complex, multi-dimensional topic. The results show that these 44 participants prefer a diverse mix of renewable technologies for Switzerland in 2035. In terms of siting, these participants consistently choose the efficiency strategy, where new plants are concentrated in the areas where they produce most electricity at least cost, in contrast to the strategy of regional equity, where all Swiss regions would equally build new generation and share the benefits and burdens of the energy transition. |
topic |
electricity mix renewable energy equity spatial planning participatory planning public preferences |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4961 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT franziskasteinberger efficiencyversusequityinspatialsitingofelectricitygenerationcitizenpreferencesinaseriousboardgameinswitzerland AT tobiasminder efficiencyversusequityinspatialsitingofelectricitygenerationcitizenpreferencesinaseriousboardgameinswitzerland AT evelinatrutnevyte efficiencyversusequityinspatialsitingofelectricitygenerationcitizenpreferencesinaseriousboardgameinswitzerland |
_version_ |
1724733179619704832 |