Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows

The burgeoning of recent publications on human rights shows how fashionable an object of study international human rights have become lately, and this especially among philosophers and historians. Curiously, however, given that joint development, human rights theorists and human rights historians se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samantha Besson, Alain Zysset
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ancilla Iuris 2012-09-01
Series:Ancilla Iuris
Online Access:https://anci.ch/articles/ancilla2012_204_besson-zysset.pdf
id doaj-d448798a29b34c83a2d89a9d657d3692
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d448798a29b34c83a2d89a9d657d36922020-11-25T00:34:29ZdeuAncilla IurisAncilla Iuris1661-86101661-86102012-09-01204219Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd BedfellowsSamantha BessonAlain ZyssetThe burgeoning of recent publications on human rights shows how fashionable an object of study international human rights have become lately, and this especially among philosophers and historians. Curiously, however, given that joint development, human rights theorists and human rights historians seem to be following separate paths, without much interaction between them besides historians ‘showcas[ing] the theoretical and philosophical debates about the meaning of human rights and theorists gesturing at some of the historical origins of the concept of human rights usually to then distance themselves from them. The specific question that arises for human rights theorists in this context is not only whether human rights history should matter for their normative endeavour, but also how it could be integrated methodologically in the latter, if at all. Is human rights history more than a source of information for the philosopher of human rights? Should it be used, for instance, to identify the object of human rights theorizing and then maybe to interpret it? And may it provide a critical tool for non-ideal human rights theories?https://anci.ch/articles/ancilla2012_204_besson-zysset.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samantha Besson
Alain Zysset
spellingShingle Samantha Besson
Alain Zysset
Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows
Ancilla Iuris
author_facet Samantha Besson
Alain Zysset
author_sort Samantha Besson
title Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows
title_short Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows
title_full Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows
title_fullStr Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows
title_full_unstemmed Human Rights Theory and Human Rights History - A Tale of Two Odd Bedfellows
title_sort human rights theory and human rights history - a tale of two odd bedfellows
publisher Ancilla Iuris
series Ancilla Iuris
issn 1661-8610
1661-8610
publishDate 2012-09-01
description The burgeoning of recent publications on human rights shows how fashionable an object of study international human rights have become lately, and this especially among philosophers and historians. Curiously, however, given that joint development, human rights theorists and human rights historians seem to be following separate paths, without much interaction between them besides historians ‘showcas[ing] the theoretical and philosophical debates about the meaning of human rights and theorists gesturing at some of the historical origins of the concept of human rights usually to then distance themselves from them. The specific question that arises for human rights theorists in this context is not only whether human rights history should matter for their normative endeavour, but also how it could be integrated methodologically in the latter, if at all. Is human rights history more than a source of information for the philosopher of human rights? Should it be used, for instance, to identify the object of human rights theorizing and then maybe to interpret it? And may it provide a critical tool for non-ideal human rights theories?
url https://anci.ch/articles/ancilla2012_204_besson-zysset.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT samanthabesson humanrightstheoryandhumanrightshistoryataleoftwooddbedfellows
AT alainzysset humanrightstheoryandhumanrightshistoryataleoftwooddbedfellows
_version_ 1725313178286424064