Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding

Flies use specialized photoreceptors R7 and R8 in the dorsal rim area (DRA) to detect skylight polarization. R7 and R8 form a tiered waveguide (central rhabdomere pair, CRP) with R7 on top, filtering light delivered to R8. We examine how the division of a given resource, CRP length, between R7 and R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francisco J.H. Heras, Simon B. Laughlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-01-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Fly
Jnd
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/2772.pdf
id doaj-d422e15ded184ff5baae95789faa824f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d422e15ded184ff5baae95789faa824f2020-11-24T21:00:00ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-01-015e277210.7717/peerj.2772Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization codingFrancisco J.H. Heras0Simon B. Laughlin1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United KingdomFlies use specialized photoreceptors R7 and R8 in the dorsal rim area (DRA) to detect skylight polarization. R7 and R8 form a tiered waveguide (central rhabdomere pair, CRP) with R7 on top, filtering light delivered to R8. We examine how the division of a given resource, CRP length, between R7 and R8 affects their ability to code polarization angle. We model optical absorption to show how the length fractions allotted to R7 and R8 determine the rates at which they transduce photons, and correct these rates for transduction unit saturation. The rates give polarization signal and photon noise in R7, and in R8. Their signals are combined in an opponent unit, intrinsic noise added, and the unit’s output analysed to extract two measures of coding ability, number of discriminable polarization angles and mutual information. A very long R7 maximizes opponent signal amplitude, but codes inefficiently due to photon noise in the very short R8. Discriminability and mutual information are optimized by maximizing signal to noise ratio, SNR. At lower light levels approximately equal lengths of R7 and R8 are optimal because photon noise dominates. At higher light levels intrinsic noise comes to dominate and a shorter R8 is optimum. The optimum R8 length fractions falls to one third. This intensity dependent range of optimal length fractions corresponds to the range observed in different fly species and is not affected by transduction unit saturation. We conclude that a limited resource, rhabdom length, can be divided between two polarization sensors, R7 and R8, to optimize opponent coding. We also find that coding ability increases sub-linearly with total rhabdom length, according to the law of diminishing returns. Consequently, the specialized shorter central rhabdom in the DRA codes polarization twice as efficiently with respect to rhabdom length than the longer rhabdom used in the rest of the eye.https://peerj.com/articles/2772.pdfDorsal rimPhoton noiseFlyJndPhotoreceptor lengthVision
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francisco J.H. Heras
Simon B. Laughlin
spellingShingle Francisco J.H. Heras
Simon B. Laughlin
Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
PeerJ
Dorsal rim
Photon noise
Fly
Jnd
Photoreceptor length
Vision
author_facet Francisco J.H. Heras
Simon B. Laughlin
author_sort Francisco J.H. Heras
title Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
title_short Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
title_full Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
title_fullStr Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
title_sort optimizing the use of a sensor resource for opponent polarization coding
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Flies use specialized photoreceptors R7 and R8 in the dorsal rim area (DRA) to detect skylight polarization. R7 and R8 form a tiered waveguide (central rhabdomere pair, CRP) with R7 on top, filtering light delivered to R8. We examine how the division of a given resource, CRP length, between R7 and R8 affects their ability to code polarization angle. We model optical absorption to show how the length fractions allotted to R7 and R8 determine the rates at which they transduce photons, and correct these rates for transduction unit saturation. The rates give polarization signal and photon noise in R7, and in R8. Their signals are combined in an opponent unit, intrinsic noise added, and the unit’s output analysed to extract two measures of coding ability, number of discriminable polarization angles and mutual information. A very long R7 maximizes opponent signal amplitude, but codes inefficiently due to photon noise in the very short R8. Discriminability and mutual information are optimized by maximizing signal to noise ratio, SNR. At lower light levels approximately equal lengths of R7 and R8 are optimal because photon noise dominates. At higher light levels intrinsic noise comes to dominate and a shorter R8 is optimum. The optimum R8 length fractions falls to one third. This intensity dependent range of optimal length fractions corresponds to the range observed in different fly species and is not affected by transduction unit saturation. We conclude that a limited resource, rhabdom length, can be divided between two polarization sensors, R7 and R8, to optimize opponent coding. We also find that coding ability increases sub-linearly with total rhabdom length, according to the law of diminishing returns. Consequently, the specialized shorter central rhabdom in the DRA codes polarization twice as efficiently with respect to rhabdom length than the longer rhabdom used in the rest of the eye.
topic Dorsal rim
Photon noise
Fly
Jnd
Photoreceptor length
Vision
url https://peerj.com/articles/2772.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscojhheras optimizingtheuseofasensorresourceforopponentpolarizationcoding
AT simonblaughlin optimizingtheuseofasensorresourceforopponentpolarizationcoding
_version_ 1716780656180068352