Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
Background: Falls are recognized globally as a major public health problem. Although the elderly are the most affected population, it should be noted that the pediatric population is also very susceptible to the risk of falling. The fall risk approach is the assessment tool. There are different type...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Nursing Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/2/41 |
id |
doaj-d421ec61e3374826a6df0c3f99b4fa9d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d421ec61e3374826a6df0c3f99b4fa9d2021-06-30T23:05:23ZengMDPI AGNursing Reports2039-439X2039-44032021-06-01114143044310.3390/nursrep11020041Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature ReviewVeronica Strini0Roberta Schiavolin1Angela Prendin2Clinical Research Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, ItalyContinuity of Care Service-University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, ItalyIndependent Research, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, ItalyBackground: Falls are recognized globally as a major public health problem. Although the elderly are the most affected population, it should be noted that the pediatric population is also very susceptible to the risk of falling. The fall risk approach is the assessment tool. There are different types of tools used in both clinical and territorial settings. Material and methods: In the month of January 2021, a literature search was undertaken of MEDLINE, CINHAL and The Cochrane Database, adopting as limits: last 10 years, abstract available, and English and Italian language. The search terms used were “Accidental Falls” AND “Risk Assessment” and “Fall Risk Assessment Tool” or “Fall Risk Assessment Tools”. Results: From the 115 selected articles, 38 different fall risk assessment tools were identified, divided into two groups: the first with the main tools present in the literature, and the second represented by tools of some specific areas, of lesser use and with less supporting literature. Most of these articles are prospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. All articles focus on presenting, creating or validating fall risk assessment tools. Conclusion: Due to the multidimensional nature of falling risk, there is no “ideal” tool that can be used in any context or that performs a perfect risk assessment. For this reason, a simultaneous application of multiple tools is recommended, and a direct and in-depth analysis by the healthcare professional is essential.https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/2/41fallscaleassessment toolreview |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Veronica Strini Roberta Schiavolin Angela Prendin |
spellingShingle |
Veronica Strini Roberta Schiavolin Angela Prendin Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review Nursing Reports fall scale assessment tool review |
author_facet |
Veronica Strini Roberta Schiavolin Angela Prendin |
author_sort |
Veronica Strini |
title |
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short |
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full |
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort |
fall risk assessment scales: a systematic literature review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nursing Reports |
issn |
2039-439X 2039-4403 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Background: Falls are recognized globally as a major public health problem. Although the elderly are the most affected population, it should be noted that the pediatric population is also very susceptible to the risk of falling. The fall risk approach is the assessment tool. There are different types of tools used in both clinical and territorial settings. Material and methods: In the month of January 2021, a literature search was undertaken of MEDLINE, CINHAL and The Cochrane Database, adopting as limits: last 10 years, abstract available, and English and Italian language. The search terms used were “Accidental Falls” AND “Risk Assessment” and “Fall Risk Assessment Tool” or “Fall Risk Assessment Tools”. Results: From the 115 selected articles, 38 different fall risk assessment tools were identified, divided into two groups: the first with the main tools present in the literature, and the second represented by tools of some specific areas, of lesser use and with less supporting literature. Most of these articles are prospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. All articles focus on presenting, creating or validating fall risk assessment tools. Conclusion: Due to the multidimensional nature of falling risk, there is no “ideal” tool that can be used in any context or that performs a perfect risk assessment. For this reason, a simultaneous application of multiple tools is recommended, and a direct and in-depth analysis by the healthcare professional is essential. |
topic |
fall scale assessment tool review |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/2/41 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT veronicastrini fallriskassessmentscalesasystematicliteraturereview AT robertaschiavolin fallriskassessmentscalesasystematicliteraturereview AT angelaprendin fallriskassessmentscalesasystematicliteraturereview |
_version_ |
1721352271794536448 |