Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review

Background: Falls are recognized globally as a major public health problem. Although the elderly are the most affected population, it should be noted that the pediatric population is also very susceptible to the risk of falling. The fall risk approach is the assessment tool. There are different type...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veronica Strini, Roberta Schiavolin, Angela Prendin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Nursing Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/2/41
id doaj-d421ec61e3374826a6df0c3f99b4fa9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d421ec61e3374826a6df0c3f99b4fa9d2021-06-30T23:05:23ZengMDPI AGNursing Reports2039-439X2039-44032021-06-01114143044310.3390/nursrep11020041Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature ReviewVeronica Strini0Roberta Schiavolin1Angela Prendin2Clinical Research Unit, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, ItalyContinuity of Care Service-University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, ItalyIndependent Research, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, ItalyBackground: Falls are recognized globally as a major public health problem. Although the elderly are the most affected population, it should be noted that the pediatric population is also very susceptible to the risk of falling. The fall risk approach is the assessment tool. There are different types of tools used in both clinical and territorial settings. Material and methods: In the month of January 2021, a literature search was undertaken of MEDLINE, CINHAL and The Cochrane Database, adopting as limits: last 10 years, abstract available, and English and Italian language. The search terms used were “Accidental Falls” AND “Risk Assessment” and “Fall Risk Assessment Tool” or “Fall Risk Assessment Tools”. Results: From the 115 selected articles, 38 different fall risk assessment tools were identified, divided into two groups: the first with the main tools present in the literature, and the second represented by tools of some specific areas, of lesser use and with less supporting literature. Most of these articles are prospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. All articles focus on presenting, creating or validating fall risk assessment tools. Conclusion: Due to the multidimensional nature of falling risk, there is no “ideal” tool that can be used in any context or that performs a perfect risk assessment. For this reason, a simultaneous application of multiple tools is recommended, and a direct and in-depth analysis by the healthcare professional is essential.https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/2/41fallscaleassessment toolreview
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Veronica Strini
Roberta Schiavolin
Angela Prendin
spellingShingle Veronica Strini
Roberta Schiavolin
Angela Prendin
Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
Nursing Reports
fall
scale
assessment tool
review
author_facet Veronica Strini
Roberta Schiavolin
Angela Prendin
author_sort Veronica Strini
title Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Fall Risk Assessment Scales: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort fall risk assessment scales: a systematic literature review
publisher MDPI AG
series Nursing Reports
issn 2039-439X
2039-4403
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Background: Falls are recognized globally as a major public health problem. Although the elderly are the most affected population, it should be noted that the pediatric population is also very susceptible to the risk of falling. The fall risk approach is the assessment tool. There are different types of tools used in both clinical and territorial settings. Material and methods: In the month of January 2021, a literature search was undertaken of MEDLINE, CINHAL and The Cochrane Database, adopting as limits: last 10 years, abstract available, and English and Italian language. The search terms used were “Accidental Falls” AND “Risk Assessment” and “Fall Risk Assessment Tool” or “Fall Risk Assessment Tools”. Results: From the 115 selected articles, 38 different fall risk assessment tools were identified, divided into two groups: the first with the main tools present in the literature, and the second represented by tools of some specific areas, of lesser use and with less supporting literature. Most of these articles are prospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. All articles focus on presenting, creating or validating fall risk assessment tools. Conclusion: Due to the multidimensional nature of falling risk, there is no “ideal” tool that can be used in any context or that performs a perfect risk assessment. For this reason, a simultaneous application of multiple tools is recommended, and a direct and in-depth analysis by the healthcare professional is essential.
topic fall
scale
assessment tool
review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/2/41
work_keys_str_mv AT veronicastrini fallriskassessmentscalesasystematicliteraturereview
AT robertaschiavolin fallriskassessmentscalesasystematicliteraturereview
AT angelaprendin fallriskassessmentscalesasystematicliteraturereview
_version_ 1721352271794536448