Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame

A comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alechenu Audu Aboje, Mohammed Umar Garba, Ambali Saka Abdulkareem, Edison Muzenda, Aisha Abubakar Faruq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Cogent Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2017.1302543
id doaj-d415424e78824296aeffae9ac3478a5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d415424e78824296aeffae9ac3478a5b2021-03-02T14:23:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Environmental Science2331-18432017-01-013110.1080/23311843.2017.13025431302543Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flameAlechenu Audu Aboje0Mohammed Umar Garba1Ambali Saka Abdulkareem2Edison Muzenda3Aisha Abubakar Faruq4Federal University of TechnologyFederal University of TechnologyFederal University of TechnologyFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Department of Chemical EngineeringFederal University of TechnologyA comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure model, the k-ω shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and the transitional SST turbulence model and the three models have been compared. Combustion was modeled using the unsteady Stationary Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM), the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM), and the Pollutant Model (PM) and the three models have also been compared. Numerical predictions show good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the experimental data showed that the k-ε realizable turbulence model and the k-ω SST turbulence model performed better than transitional SST model in predicting the pollutant species from the flame. The result also shows that the PM performed better than flamelet models in predicting the combustion characteristics of NOX in the flame.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2017.1302543gas flaresdiffusion flamespollutant speciesturbulence models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alechenu Audu Aboje
Mohammed Umar Garba
Ambali Saka Abdulkareem
Edison Muzenda
Aisha Abubakar Faruq
spellingShingle Alechenu Audu Aboje
Mohammed Umar Garba
Ambali Saka Abdulkareem
Edison Muzenda
Aisha Abubakar Faruq
Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
Cogent Environmental Science
gas flares
diffusion flames
pollutant species
turbulence models
author_facet Alechenu Audu Aboje
Mohammed Umar Garba
Ambali Saka Abdulkareem
Edison Muzenda
Aisha Abubakar Faruq
author_sort Alechenu Audu Aboje
title Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
title_short Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
title_full Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
title_fullStr Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
title_full_unstemmed Numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
title_sort numerical modelling of pollutant formation in a lifted methane–air vertical diffusion flame
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Environmental Science
issn 2331-1843
publishDate 2017-01-01
description A comparison of turbulence and combustion models have been performed for predicting CO2 and NOx formation from a methane diffusion flame firing vertically upwards. The flow field has been modeled using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equation incorporating the k-ε realizable turbulence closure model, the k-ω shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model and the transitional SST turbulence model and the three models have been compared. Combustion was modeled using the unsteady Stationary Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM), the Eulerian Particle Flamelet Model (EPFM), and the Pollutant Model (PM) and the three models have also been compared. Numerical predictions show good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the experimental data showed that the k-ε realizable turbulence model and the k-ω SST turbulence model performed better than transitional SST model in predicting the pollutant species from the flame. The result also shows that the PM performed better than flamelet models in predicting the combustion characteristics of NOX in the flame.
topic gas flares
diffusion flames
pollutant species
turbulence models
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2017.1302543
work_keys_str_mv AT alechenuauduaboje numericalmodellingofpollutantformationinaliftedmethaneairverticaldiffusionflame
AT mohammedumargarba numericalmodellingofpollutantformationinaliftedmethaneairverticaldiffusionflame
AT ambalisakaabdulkareem numericalmodellingofpollutantformationinaliftedmethaneairverticaldiffusionflame
AT edisonmuzenda numericalmodellingofpollutantformationinaliftedmethaneairverticaldiffusionflame
AT aishaabubakarfaruq numericalmodellingofpollutantformationinaliftedmethaneairverticaldiffusionflame
_version_ 1724235044766089216