Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai

The objectives of this study are to compare the energy consumption rate (ECR) of battery electric bus (BEB) simulated from international driving cycles and a real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai (CMDC) and to define the ECR multiplier to convert the simulated ECR obtained from international drivin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niti Kammuang-lue, Jirawat Boonjun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472100336X
id doaj-d40e4b701fd14957957a36111a76b73e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d40e4b701fd14957957a36111a76b73e2021-06-11T05:14:55ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472021-11-01732673272Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang MaiNiti Kammuang-lue0Jirawat Boonjun1Corresponding author.; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Rd., Suthep, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Rd., Suthep, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandThe objectives of this study are to compare the energy consumption rate (ECR) of battery electric bus (BEB) simulated from international driving cycles and a real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai (CMDC) and to define the ECR multiplier to convert the simulated ECR obtained from international driving cycles to the CMDC. Four international driving cycles were chosen. Each driving cycle was separately considered for two cases, one with air resistance and one without. It was concluded that the ECR obtained from the EPA heavy duty urban dynamometer driving schedule (EPA HDUDDS) is most similar to the CMDC but the ECR obtained from the regulation of the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure (WLTP) differs the most. The ECR multipliers used for correcting the simulated ECR were in a range between 0.839 and 1.711.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472100336XBattery electric busDriving cycleEnergy consumptionDynamic vehicle modelBackward-facing model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Niti Kammuang-lue
Jirawat Boonjun
spellingShingle Niti Kammuang-lue
Jirawat Boonjun
Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
Energy Reports
Battery electric bus
Driving cycle
Energy consumption
Dynamic vehicle model
Backward-facing model
author_facet Niti Kammuang-lue
Jirawat Boonjun
author_sort Niti Kammuang-lue
title Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
title_short Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
title_full Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
title_fullStr Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
title_full_unstemmed Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
title_sort energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in chiang mai
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Reports
issn 2352-4847
publishDate 2021-11-01
description The objectives of this study are to compare the energy consumption rate (ECR) of battery electric bus (BEB) simulated from international driving cycles and a real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai (CMDC) and to define the ECR multiplier to convert the simulated ECR obtained from international driving cycles to the CMDC. Four international driving cycles were chosen. Each driving cycle was separately considered for two cases, one with air resistance and one without. It was concluded that the ECR obtained from the EPA heavy duty urban dynamometer driving schedule (EPA HDUDDS) is most similar to the CMDC but the ECR obtained from the regulation of the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure (WLTP) differs the most. The ECR multipliers used for correcting the simulated ECR were in a range between 0.839 and 1.711.
topic Battery electric bus
Driving cycle
Energy consumption
Dynamic vehicle model
Backward-facing model
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472100336X
work_keys_str_mv AT nitikammuanglue energyconsumptionofbatteryelectricbussimulatedfrominternationaldrivingcyclescomparedtorealworlddrivingcycleinchiangmai
AT jirawatboonjun energyconsumptionofbatteryelectricbussimulatedfrominternationaldrivingcyclescomparedtorealworlddrivingcycleinchiangmai
_version_ 1721383414920118272