Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai
The objectives of this study are to compare the energy consumption rate (ECR) of battery electric bus (BEB) simulated from international driving cycles and a real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai (CMDC) and to define the ECR multiplier to convert the simulated ECR obtained from international drivin...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Energy Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472100336X |
id |
doaj-d40e4b701fd14957957a36111a76b73e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d40e4b701fd14957957a36111a76b73e2021-06-11T05:14:55ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472021-11-01732673272Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang MaiNiti Kammuang-lue0Jirawat Boonjun1Corresponding author.; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Rd., Suthep, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huay Kaew Rd., Suthep, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandThe objectives of this study are to compare the energy consumption rate (ECR) of battery electric bus (BEB) simulated from international driving cycles and a real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai (CMDC) and to define the ECR multiplier to convert the simulated ECR obtained from international driving cycles to the CMDC. Four international driving cycles were chosen. Each driving cycle was separately considered for two cases, one with air resistance and one without. It was concluded that the ECR obtained from the EPA heavy duty urban dynamometer driving schedule (EPA HDUDDS) is most similar to the CMDC but the ECR obtained from the regulation of the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure (WLTP) differs the most. The ECR multipliers used for correcting the simulated ECR were in a range between 0.839 and 1.711.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472100336XBattery electric busDriving cycleEnergy consumptionDynamic vehicle modelBackward-facing model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Niti Kammuang-lue Jirawat Boonjun |
spellingShingle |
Niti Kammuang-lue Jirawat Boonjun Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai Energy Reports Battery electric bus Driving cycle Energy consumption Dynamic vehicle model Backward-facing model |
author_facet |
Niti Kammuang-lue Jirawat Boonjun |
author_sort |
Niti Kammuang-lue |
title |
Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai |
title_short |
Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai |
title_full |
Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai |
title_fullStr |
Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai |
title_sort |
energy consumption of battery electric bus simulated from international driving cycles compared to real-world driving cycle in chiang mai |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Energy Reports |
issn |
2352-4847 |
publishDate |
2021-11-01 |
description |
The objectives of this study are to compare the energy consumption rate (ECR) of battery electric bus (BEB) simulated from international driving cycles and a real-world driving cycle in Chiang Mai (CMDC) and to define the ECR multiplier to convert the simulated ECR obtained from international driving cycles to the CMDC. Four international driving cycles were chosen. Each driving cycle was separately considered for two cases, one with air resistance and one without. It was concluded that the ECR obtained from the EPA heavy duty urban dynamometer driving schedule (EPA HDUDDS) is most similar to the CMDC but the ECR obtained from the regulation of the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure (WLTP) differs the most. The ECR multipliers used for correcting the simulated ECR were in a range between 0.839 and 1.711. |
topic |
Battery electric bus Driving cycle Energy consumption Dynamic vehicle model Backward-facing model |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472100336X |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nitikammuanglue energyconsumptionofbatteryelectricbussimulatedfrominternationaldrivingcyclescomparedtorealworlddrivingcycleinchiangmai AT jirawatboonjun energyconsumptionofbatteryelectricbussimulatedfrominternationaldrivingcyclescomparedtorealworlddrivingcycleinchiangmai |
_version_ |
1721383414920118272 |