Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles

This paper investigates the three-body wear resistance rates of five restorative dental composite materials at different mastication cycles and compares the results with that of an amalgam material. Five specimens of each material were exposed three-body wear tests using a computer-controlled chewin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yılmaz Efe Cetin, Sadeler Recep
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2018-07-01
Series:Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2016-0385
id doaj-d3fcab82ddbf480a9824acf00315465c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d3fcab82ddbf480a9824acf00315465c2021-09-05T14:00:32ZengDe GruyterScience and Engineering of Composite Materials0792-12332191-03592018-07-0125478178710.1515/secm-2016-0385Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cyclesYılmaz Efe Cetin0Sadeler Recep1Department of Technical Science of Pasinler Vocational School, Ataturk University, Erzurum, TurkeyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ataturk University, Erzurum, TurkeyThis paper investigates the three-body wear resistance rates of five restorative dental composite materials at different mastication cycles and compares the results with that of an amalgam material. Five specimens of each material were exposed three-body wear tests using a computer-controlled chewing simulator with steatite balls as the antagonist (1.6 Hz, 49 N load; 120,000, 240,000 and 480,000 mechanical cycles; and thermal cycling between 5 and 55°C at 5 min/cycle and 3000 cycles) immersed in a poppy seed slurry (three-body wear environment). Initially, the microhardness values of the composite materials in the Vicker’s hardness (HV) scale were determined. The mean volume loss of the worn surfaces was measured with a three-dimensional profilometer. Means and standard deviations were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA (α=0.05). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy analysis was performed to examine the wear tracks on the surface. The interactions between the composite resin and mean volume loss were found to be significant. The three-body wear rates for the composites Durafil and Kalore composite were significantly higher than those of the other composites and the amalgam irrespective of the number of mastication cycles. Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme composite resins had good three-body wear resistance similar to that of the amalgam. However, this study suggests that the correlation between Vicker’s hardness and three-body wear resistance is not significant.https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2016-0385chewing simulationcomposite resinhardnessvolume losswear
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yılmaz Efe Cetin
Sadeler Recep
spellingShingle Yılmaz Efe Cetin
Sadeler Recep
Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
chewing simulation
composite resin
hardness
volume loss
wear
author_facet Yılmaz Efe Cetin
Sadeler Recep
author_sort Yılmaz Efe Cetin
title Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
title_short Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
title_full Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
title_fullStr Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
title_sort investigation of three-body wear of dental materials under different chewing cycles
publisher De Gruyter
series Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
issn 0792-1233
2191-0359
publishDate 2018-07-01
description This paper investigates the three-body wear resistance rates of five restorative dental composite materials at different mastication cycles and compares the results with that of an amalgam material. Five specimens of each material were exposed three-body wear tests using a computer-controlled chewing simulator with steatite balls as the antagonist (1.6 Hz, 49 N load; 120,000, 240,000 and 480,000 mechanical cycles; and thermal cycling between 5 and 55°C at 5 min/cycle and 3000 cycles) immersed in a poppy seed slurry (three-body wear environment). Initially, the microhardness values of the composite materials in the Vicker’s hardness (HV) scale were determined. The mean volume loss of the worn surfaces was measured with a three-dimensional profilometer. Means and standard deviations were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA (α=0.05). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy analysis was performed to examine the wear tracks on the surface. The interactions between the composite resin and mean volume loss were found to be significant. The three-body wear rates for the composites Durafil and Kalore composite were significantly higher than those of the other composites and the amalgam irrespective of the number of mastication cycles. Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme composite resins had good three-body wear resistance similar to that of the amalgam. However, this study suggests that the correlation between Vicker’s hardness and three-body wear resistance is not significant.
topic chewing simulation
composite resin
hardness
volume loss
wear
url https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2016-0385
work_keys_str_mv AT yılmazefecetin investigationofthreebodywearofdentalmaterialsunderdifferentchewingcycles
AT sadelerrecep investigationofthreebodywearofdentalmaterialsunderdifferentchewingcycles
_version_ 1717811752455897088