A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement

Abstract Background This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and reporting of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Richard D. Urman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05869-0
id doaj-d3f53211a946479cbdad7d65d17908c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d3f53211a946479cbdad7d65d17908c82020-12-06T12:09:07ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-12-0120111510.1186/s12913-020-05869-0A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus StatementAna Paula Beck da Silva Etges0Carisi Anne Polanczyk1Richard D. UrmanNational Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS)- CNPq/Brazil (project: 465518/2014-1)National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS)- CNPq/Brazil (project: 465518/2014-1)Abstract Background This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and reporting of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium. Methods A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Focus Group process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element. Results The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and comments on the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory. Conclusions This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05869-0Time-driven activity based costingValue-based healthcareTDABCVBHCMicrocostingHealthcare costs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges
Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Richard D. Urman
spellingShingle Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges
Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Richard D. Urman
A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement
BMC Health Services Research
Time-driven activity based costing
Value-based healthcare
TDABC
VBHC
Microcosting
Healthcare costs
author_facet Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges
Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Richard D. Urman
author_sort Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges
title A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement
title_short A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement
title_full A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement
title_fullStr A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement
title_full_unstemmed A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement
title_sort standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using tdabc in healthcare: the tdabc in healthcare consortium consensus statement
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Background This Consensus Statement introduces a standardized framework, in a checklist format, to support future development and reporting of TDABC studies in healthcare, and to encourage their reproducibility. Additionally, it establishes the first formal networking of TDABC researchers through the creation of the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium. Methods A consensus group of researchers reviewed the most relevant TDABC studies available in Medline and Scopus databases to identify the initial elements of the checklist. Using a Focus Group process, each element received a recommendation regarding where in the scientific article section it should be placed and whether the element was required or suggested. A questionnaire was circulated with expert researchers in the field to provide additional recommendations regarding the content of the checklist and the strength of recommendation for each included element. Results The TDABC standardized framework includes 32 elements, provides recommendations where in the scientific article to include each element, and comments on the strength of each recommendation. All 32 elements were validated, with 21 elements classified as mandatory and 11 as suggested but not mandatory. Conclusions This is the first standardized framework to support the development and reporting of TDABC research in healthcare and to stablish a community of experts in TDABC methodology. We expect that it can contribute to scale strategies that would result in cost-savings outcomes and in value-oriented strategies that can be adopted in healthcare systems and institutions.
topic Time-driven activity based costing
Value-based healthcare
TDABC
VBHC
Microcosting
Healthcare costs
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05869-0
work_keys_str_mv AT anapaulabeckdasilvaetges astandardizedframeworktoevaluatethequalityofstudiesusingtdabcinhealthcarethetdabcinhealthcareconsortiumconsensusstatement
AT carisiannepolanczyk astandardizedframeworktoevaluatethequalityofstudiesusingtdabcinhealthcarethetdabcinhealthcareconsortiumconsensusstatement
AT richarddurman astandardizedframeworktoevaluatethequalityofstudiesusingtdabcinhealthcarethetdabcinhealthcareconsortiumconsensusstatement
AT anapaulabeckdasilvaetges standardizedframeworktoevaluatethequalityofstudiesusingtdabcinhealthcarethetdabcinhealthcareconsortiumconsensusstatement
AT carisiannepolanczyk standardizedframeworktoevaluatethequalityofstudiesusingtdabcinhealthcarethetdabcinhealthcareconsortiumconsensusstatement
AT richarddurman standardizedframeworktoevaluatethequalityofstudiesusingtdabcinhealthcarethetdabcinhealthcareconsortiumconsensusstatement
_version_ 1724399243670585344