Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types
Word-types represent the primary form of data for many models of phonological learning, and they often predict performance in psycholinguistic tasks. Word-types are often tacitly defined as phonologically unique words. Yet, an explicit test of this definition is lacking, and natural language pattern...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Laboratory Phonology |
Online Access: | http://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/39 |
id |
doaj-d3d6c6ff4ab0470ea2a12e94ae379ded |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d3d6c6ff4ab0470ea2a12e94ae379ded2021-10-02T02:30:56ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesLaboratory Phonology1868-63541868-63542016-08-017110.5334/labphon.3914Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-TypesPeter Richtsmeier0Purdue UniversityWord-types represent the primary form of data for many models of phonological learning, and they often predict performance in psycholinguistic tasks. Word-types are often tacitly defined as phonologically unique words. Yet, an explicit test of this definition is lacking, and natural language patterning suggests that word meaning could also act as a cue to word-type status. This possibility was tested in a statistical phonotactic learning experiment in which phonological and semantic properties of word-types varied. During familiarization, the learning targets—word-medial consonant sequences—were instantiated either by four related word-types or by just one word-type (the experimental frequency factor). The expectation was that more word-types would lead participants to generalize the target sequences. Regarding semantic cues, related word-types were either associated with different referents or all with a single referent. Regarding phonological cues, related word-types differed from each other by one, two, or more phonemes. At test, participants rated novel wordforms for their similarity to the familiarization words. When participants heard four related word-types, they gave higher ratings to test words with the same consonant sequences, irrespective of the phonological and semantic manipulations. The results support the existing phonological definition of word-types.http://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/39 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Richtsmeier |
spellingShingle |
Peter Richtsmeier Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types Laboratory Phonology |
author_facet |
Peter Richtsmeier |
author_sort |
Peter Richtsmeier |
title |
Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types |
title_short |
Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types |
title_full |
Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types |
title_fullStr |
Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phonological and Semantic Cues to Learning from Word-Types |
title_sort |
phonological and semantic cues to learning from word-types |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Laboratory Phonology |
issn |
1868-6354 1868-6354 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
Word-types represent the primary form of data for many models of phonological learning, and they often predict performance in psycholinguistic tasks. Word-types are often tacitly defined as phonologically unique words. Yet, an explicit test of this definition is lacking, and natural language patterning suggests that word meaning could also act as a cue to word-type status. This possibility was tested in a statistical phonotactic learning experiment in which phonological and semantic properties of word-types varied. During familiarization, the learning targets—word-medial consonant sequences—were instantiated either by four related word-types or by just one word-type (the experimental frequency factor). The expectation was that more word-types would lead participants to generalize the target sequences. Regarding semantic cues, related word-types were either associated with different referents or all with a single referent. Regarding phonological cues, related word-types differed from each other by one, two, or more phonemes. At test, participants rated novel wordforms for their similarity to the familiarization words. When participants heard four related word-types, they gave higher ratings to test words with the same consonant sequences, irrespective of the phonological and semantic manipulations. The results support the existing phonological definition of word-types. |
url |
http://www.journal-labphon.org/articles/39 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterrichtsmeier phonologicalandsemanticcuestolearningfromwordtypes |
_version_ |
1716860257602371584 |