Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California

The United States is one of the largest per capita water withdrawers in the world, and certain parts of it, especially the western region, have long experienced water scarcity. Historically, the U.S. relied on large water infrastructure investments and planning to solve its water scarcity problems....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dilek Uz, Steven Buck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3995
id doaj-d3cd94a0b51848ae98d35d58a3cab84f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d3cd94a0b51848ae98d35d58a3cab84f2020-11-25T02:58:43ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-05-01123995399510.3390/su12103995Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern CaliforniaDilek Uz0Steven Buck1Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USADepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USAThe United States is one of the largest per capita water withdrawers in the world, and certain parts of it, especially the western region, have long experienced water scarcity. Historically, the U.S. relied on large water infrastructure investments and planning to solve its water scarcity problems. These large-scale investments as well as water planning activities rely on water forecast studies conducted by water managing agencies. These forecasts, while key to the sustainable management of water, are usually done using historical growth extrapolation, conventional econometric approaches, or legacy software packages and often do not utilize methods common in the field of statistical learning. The objective of this study is to illustrate the extent to which forecast outcomes for commercial, institutional and industrial water use may be improved with a relatively simple adjustment to forecast model selection. To do so, we estimate over 352 thousand regression models with retailer level panel data from the largest utility in the U.S., featuring a rich set of variables to model commercial, institutional, and industrial water use in Southern California. Out-of-sample forecasting performances of those models that rank within the top 5% based on various in- and out-of-sample goodness-of-fit criteria were compared. We demonstrate that models with the best in-sample fit yeild, on average, larger forecast errors for out-of-sample forecast exercises and are subject to a significant degree of variation in forecasts. We find that out-of-sample forecast error and the variability in the forecast values can be reduced by an order of magnitude with a relatively straightforward change in the model selection criteria even when the forecast modelers do not have access to “big data” or utilize state-of-the-art machine learning techniques.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3995commercialinstitutionaland industrial water useforecast methodswater planningsustainable water management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dilek Uz
Steven Buck
spellingShingle Dilek Uz
Steven Buck
Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California
Sustainability
commercial
institutional
and industrial water use
forecast methods
water planning
sustainable water management
author_facet Dilek Uz
Steven Buck
author_sort Dilek Uz
title Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California
title_short Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California
title_full Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California
title_fullStr Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California
title_sort comparing water use forecasting model selection criteria: the case of commercial, institutional, and industrial sector in southern california
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The United States is one of the largest per capita water withdrawers in the world, and certain parts of it, especially the western region, have long experienced water scarcity. Historically, the U.S. relied on large water infrastructure investments and planning to solve its water scarcity problems. These large-scale investments as well as water planning activities rely on water forecast studies conducted by water managing agencies. These forecasts, while key to the sustainable management of water, are usually done using historical growth extrapolation, conventional econometric approaches, or legacy software packages and often do not utilize methods common in the field of statistical learning. The objective of this study is to illustrate the extent to which forecast outcomes for commercial, institutional and industrial water use may be improved with a relatively simple adjustment to forecast model selection. To do so, we estimate over 352 thousand regression models with retailer level panel data from the largest utility in the U.S., featuring a rich set of variables to model commercial, institutional, and industrial water use in Southern California. Out-of-sample forecasting performances of those models that rank within the top 5% based on various in- and out-of-sample goodness-of-fit criteria were compared. We demonstrate that models with the best in-sample fit yeild, on average, larger forecast errors for out-of-sample forecast exercises and are subject to a significant degree of variation in forecasts. We find that out-of-sample forecast error and the variability in the forecast values can be reduced by an order of magnitude with a relatively straightforward change in the model selection criteria even when the forecast modelers do not have access to “big data” or utilize state-of-the-art machine learning techniques.
topic commercial
institutional
and industrial water use
forecast methods
water planning
sustainable water management
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3995
work_keys_str_mv AT dilekuz comparingwateruseforecastingmodelselectioncriteriathecaseofcommercialinstitutionalandindustrialsectorinsoutherncalifornia
AT stevenbuck comparingwateruseforecastingmodelselectioncriteriathecaseofcommercialinstitutionalandindustrialsectorinsoutherncalifornia
_version_ 1724705470213521408