Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies
In this paper, we compare the predictions on the market liquidity in crypto and fiat currencies between two traditional time series methods, the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), and the machine learning algorithm called t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Mathematics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/1/56 |
id |
doaj-d3b7dc6ee6084facac2cb0cf78ad9114 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d3b7dc6ee6084facac2cb0cf78ad91142020-12-30T00:04:35ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-12-019565610.3390/math9010056Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat CurrenciesKlender Cortez0Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García1Samuel Mongrut2Facultad de Contaduria Publica y Administracion, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolás de los Garza 66451, MexicoFacultad de Contaduria Publica y Administracion, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolás de los Garza 66451, MexicoEGADE Business School, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García 66269, MexicoIn this paper, we compare the predictions on the market liquidity in crypto and fiat currencies between two traditional time series methods, the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), and the machine learning algorithm called the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach. We measure market liquidity as the log rates of bid-ask spreads in a sample of three cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple) and 16 major fiat currencies from 9 February 2018 to 8 February 2019. We find that the KNN approach is better suited for capturing the market liquidity in a cryptocurrency in the short-term than the ARMA and GARCH models maybe due to the complexity of the microstructure of the market. Considering traditional time series models, we find that ARMA models perform well when estimating the liquidity of fiat currencies in developed markets, whereas GARCH models do the same for fiat currencies in emerging markets. Nevertheless, our results show that the KNN approach can better predict the log rates of the bid-ask spreads of crypto and fiat currencies than ARMA and GARCH models.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/1/56Bitcoindigital moneyEthereuminvestor behaviorRippletime series analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Klender Cortez Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García Samuel Mongrut |
spellingShingle |
Klender Cortez Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García Samuel Mongrut Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies Mathematics Bitcoin digital money Ethereum investor behavior Ripple time series analysis |
author_facet |
Klender Cortez Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García Samuel Mongrut |
author_sort |
Klender Cortez |
title |
Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies |
title_short |
Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies |
title_full |
Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies |
title_fullStr |
Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies |
title_sort |
exchange market liquidity prediction with the k-nearest neighbor approach: crypto vs. fiat currencies |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Mathematics |
issn |
2227-7390 |
publishDate |
2021-12-01 |
description |
In this paper, we compare the predictions on the market liquidity in crypto and fiat currencies between two traditional time series methods, the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), and the machine learning algorithm called the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach. We measure market liquidity as the log rates of bid-ask spreads in a sample of three cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple) and 16 major fiat currencies from 9 February 2018 to 8 February 2019. We find that the KNN approach is better suited for capturing the market liquidity in a cryptocurrency in the short-term than the ARMA and GARCH models maybe due to the complexity of the microstructure of the market. Considering traditional time series models, we find that ARMA models perform well when estimating the liquidity of fiat currencies in developed markets, whereas GARCH models do the same for fiat currencies in emerging markets. Nevertheless, our results show that the KNN approach can better predict the log rates of the bid-ask spreads of crypto and fiat currencies than ARMA and GARCH models. |
topic |
Bitcoin digital money Ethereum investor behavior Ripple time series analysis |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/1/56 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT klendercortez exchangemarketliquiditypredictionwiththeknearestneighborapproachcryptovsfiatcurrencies AT marthadelpilarrodriguezgarcia exchangemarketliquiditypredictionwiththeknearestneighborapproachcryptovsfiatcurrencies AT samuelmongrut exchangemarketliquiditypredictionwiththeknearestneighborapproachcryptovsfiatcurrencies |
_version_ |
1724367267126312960 |