Effect of Hospital Linens on Unit-Acquired Pressure Injuries for Adults in Medical ICUs: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

• Main Authors: Mary Montague-McCown, DNP, APRN, ACNS-BC, CWOCN, James Bena, MS, Christian N. Burchill, PhD, MSN, RN, CEN
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-03-01
• Series: Critical Care Explorations
• Online Access: http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000336

Objectives:. Researchers have shown in laboratory studies that different types of fabrics were associated with changes in skin moisture, friction, shear, and temperature that may predispose patients to pressure injury. There was an association between type of fiber used in hospital linens and pressure injury development in previous clinical studies. We examined if bed linens made from a newly developed synthetic fiber fabric affected occurrence rate, time to development, and severity of unit-acquired pressure injury in critically ill adult inpatients. Design:. Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting:. Five adult medical ICUs within one quaternary care center in the Midwest United States. Patients:. Patients were assigned to a unit based on bed availability. In total, there were 3,332 patients in the study. INTERVENTIONS:. Participating medical ICUs were randomly assigned to cotton fiber or synthetic fiber linens for the first 6 months of the study period, and assignment reversed after a 14-day washout period for the final 6 months. Measurements and Main Results:. Unit-acquired pressure injury occurrence rate, time to first unit-acquired pressure injury, and severity were evaluated using generalized mixed effect models with patient as a random effect, and a marginal Cox proportional hazards model with repeated admissions from the same patient accounted for by use of a sandwich estimator of the variance. There were 1,706 patients on cotton fiber linens and 1,626 patients on synthetic fiber linens. Groups were similar on demographics except race and admitting diagnosis groupings. Occurrence rate (p = 0.99), time to development (p = 0.99), and maximum severity of unit-acquired pressure (p = 0.86) were similar between groups before and after controlling for race and admitting diagnosis groupings. Conclusions:. Linen type did not affect unit-acquired pressure injury occurrence rate, severity, or timing. Standard unit-acquired pressure injury prevention efforts may be more cost-effective than investment in synthetic fiber linens.