Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian

Collective loss is defined as a loss in which it is not attributed to a specified person individually, but to the group of persons, so that nobody can treat himself as a main injured party. In Iranian legal system, although the collective loss is not recognized expressly in statute, but the civil li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: NAHID safari, Bizhan Haji Azizi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2019-11-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_10469_262b3c17426afb9780e0b64e0f737459.pdf
id doaj-d393e30bab794e5eb46d225b79c07449
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d393e30bab794e5eb46d225b79c074492020-11-25T03:49:57ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832019-11-01828639010.22054/JPLR.2018.33294.1928Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and IanNAHID safari 0Bizhan Haji Azizi1 professor of maragheh university professor of bu ali sina universityCollective loss is defined as a loss in which it is not attributed to a specified person individually, but to the group of persons, so that nobody can treat himself as a main injured party. In Iranian legal system, although the collective loss is not recognized expressly in statute, but the civil liability rules prove that no loss can be left without compensation. Therefore, in collective loss, being an unlimited group should not destroy the right of claim and demanding damages of the injured parties. The necessity of attention to this loss is also emphasized in other legal systems. What makes the acceptance of this loss different is the determination of persons who have the right of the claim and demanding the compensation. There are different policies in the different legal systems, such as the acceptance of representative of some associations and the acceptance of claim by one of the injured parties. By conducting a comparative study under the legal systems of France, United States and Iran, this article will analyse the collective loss and different approaches recognised in different legal systems.http://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_10469_262b3c17426afb9780e0b64e0f737459.pdfindividual loss collective losses liability material loss moral loss
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author NAHID safari
Bizhan Haji Azizi
spellingShingle NAHID safari
Bizhan Haji Azizi
Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
individual loss collective losses liability material loss moral loss
author_facet NAHID safari
Bizhan Haji Azizi
author_sort NAHID safari
title Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian
title_short Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian
title_full Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian
title_fullStr Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of France,United state and Ian
title_sort comparative study of collective losses in the legal system of france,united state and ian
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
series Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī
issn 2345-3583
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Collective loss is defined as a loss in which it is not attributed to a specified person individually, but to the group of persons, so that nobody can treat himself as a main injured party. In Iranian legal system, although the collective loss is not recognized expressly in statute, but the civil liability rules prove that no loss can be left without compensation. Therefore, in collective loss, being an unlimited group should not destroy the right of claim and demanding damages of the injured parties. The necessity of attention to this loss is also emphasized in other legal systems. What makes the acceptance of this loss different is the determination of persons who have the right of the claim and demanding the compensation. There are different policies in the different legal systems, such as the acceptance of representative of some associations and the acceptance of claim by one of the injured parties. By conducting a comparative study under the legal systems of France, United States and Iran, this article will analyse the collective loss and different approaches recognised in different legal systems.
topic individual loss collective losses liability material loss moral loss
url http://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_10469_262b3c17426afb9780e0b64e0f737459.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nahidsafari comparativestudyofcollectivelossesinthelegalsystemoffranceunitedstateandian
AT bizhanhajiazizi comparativestudyofcollectivelossesinthelegalsystemoffranceunitedstateandian
_version_ 1724493015410540544