Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?

Inter- and intra-annual variation in forage quality may influence population dynamics of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island. From 1993 to 1998 we collected 300 composite samples of sedge (Carex aquatilis and Carex spp.), willow (Salix arctica), legume (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas C. Larter, John A. Nagy, David S. Hik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2002-03-01
Series:Rangifer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1533
id doaj-d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d39257a0a0054f9cba8bc9617e8db86b2020-11-24T21:27:55ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingRangifer1890-67292002-03-0122210.7557/2.22.2.15331431Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?Nicholas C. LarterJohn A. NagyDavid S. HikInter- and intra-annual variation in forage quality may influence population dynamics of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island. From 1993 to 1998 we collected 300 composite samples of sedge (Carex aquatilis and Carex spp.), willow (Salix arctica), legume (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), and avens (Dryas integrifolia). Samples were collected in mid-June (start of the growing season), mid-July (peak of the growing season), mid-late August (senescence), and early (November), mid- (February), and late- (April/May) winter. We analysed forages for percent digestibility (in vitro acid-pepsin dry matter digestibility), crude protein (CP), fibre, lignin, and energy content. There was significant inter-annual variation in levels of lignin, fibre, and energy, and significant intra-annual (seasonal) variation for all quality measures and forages, which reflected the strong difference in quality between summer and winter. We discuss the relationship between forage quality and seasonal diet composition of Peary caribou and muskoxen, and the potential implications for the reduced Peary caribou and high muskoxen populations.https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1533arcticdigestibilityenergyfibreligninnitrogen
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicholas C. Larter
John A. Nagy
David S. Hik
spellingShingle Nicholas C. Larter
John A. Nagy
David S. Hik
Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
Rangifer
arctic
digestibility
energy
fibre
lignin
nitrogen
author_facet Nicholas C. Larter
John A. Nagy
David S. Hik
author_sort Nicholas C. Larter
title Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_short Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_full Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_fullStr Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_full_unstemmed Does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and Peary caribou on Banks Island?
title_sort does seasonal variation in forage quality influence the potential for resource competition between muskoxen and peary caribou on banks island?
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
series Rangifer
issn 1890-6729
publishDate 2002-03-01
description Inter- and intra-annual variation in forage quality may influence population dynamics of Peary caribou and muskoxen on Banks Island. From 1993 to 1998 we collected 300 composite samples of sedge (Carex aquatilis and Carex spp.), willow (Salix arctica), legume (Oxytropis spp. and Astragalus spp.), and avens (Dryas integrifolia). Samples were collected in mid-June (start of the growing season), mid-July (peak of the growing season), mid-late August (senescence), and early (November), mid- (February), and late- (April/May) winter. We analysed forages for percent digestibility (in vitro acid-pepsin dry matter digestibility), crude protein (CP), fibre, lignin, and energy content. There was significant inter-annual variation in levels of lignin, fibre, and energy, and significant intra-annual (seasonal) variation for all quality measures and forages, which reflected the strong difference in quality between summer and winter. We discuss the relationship between forage quality and seasonal diet composition of Peary caribou and muskoxen, and the potential implications for the reduced Peary caribou and high muskoxen populations.
topic arctic
digestibility
energy
fibre
lignin
nitrogen
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/1533
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasclarter doesseasonalvariationinforagequalityinfluencethepotentialforresourcecompetitionbetweenmuskoxenandpearycaribouonbanksisland
AT johnanagy doesseasonalvariationinforagequalityinfluencethepotentialforresourcecompetitionbetweenmuskoxenandpearycaribouonbanksisland
AT davidshik doesseasonalvariationinforagequalityinfluencethepotentialforresourcecompetitionbetweenmuskoxenandpearycaribouonbanksisland
_version_ 1725972508466741248