Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability

Organic and fair trade campaigns bring water sustainability onto public agendas, such as for example in the cotton/textile sector. Armedangels, a German company, advertises its t-shirts by arguing that their production requires only 1/10th of the water required in conventional production. This artic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Kemper, Lena Partzsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/297
id doaj-d38749ae2ae747bbbec6836f0fa8af67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d38749ae2ae747bbbec6836f0fa8af672020-11-25T01:51:37ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-02-0111229710.3390/w11020297w11020297Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water SustainabilityLaura Kemper0Lena Partzsch1Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, CH-5070 Frick, SwitzerlandUniversity of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, D-79106 Freiburg, GermanyOrganic and fair trade campaigns bring water sustainability onto public agendas, such as for example in the cotton/textile sector. Armedangels, a German company, advertises its t-shirts by arguing that their production requires only 1/10th of the water required in conventional production. This article studies the ambitions of such corporate agenda-setters. Methodologically, we develop a framework that contains six criteria and nine indicators, which allow us to code and assess the certification standards. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews, group discussions, and participatory observations in order to better understand whose agendas certification is promulgating. The criteria encompass the social and environmental dimensions of water sustainability. Our cases include Naturland (a private organic standard), the European Union (EU) Organic Regulation (a public organic standard), the Fairtrade Labeling Organization (FLO) (a fair trade initiative), and the Fair for Life (FFL) standard (an organic and fair trade standard). Our study also looks at the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) and Cotton made in Africa (CmiA), which are two multi-stakeholder initiatives that operate on the conventional market in cooperation with non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The findings demonstrate that organic and fair trade companies rightly present themselves as water policy entrepreneurs. However, crucial aspects of water sustainability remain hidden. In particular, there is a cleavage between the environmental agendas of organic movements and NGOs that are represented in certification and the urgent social water problems in the Global South.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/297cottoncertificationwater sustainabilityagenda settingwater governance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Kemper
Lena Partzsch
spellingShingle Laura Kemper
Lena Partzsch
Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability
Water
cotton
certification
water sustainability
agenda setting
water governance
author_facet Laura Kemper
Lena Partzsch
author_sort Laura Kemper
title Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability
title_short Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability
title_full Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability
title_fullStr Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Saving Water while Doing Business: Corporate Agenda-Setting and Water Sustainability
title_sort saving water while doing business: corporate agenda-setting and water sustainability
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Organic and fair trade campaigns bring water sustainability onto public agendas, such as for example in the cotton/textile sector. Armedangels, a German company, advertises its t-shirts by arguing that their production requires only 1/10th of the water required in conventional production. This article studies the ambitions of such corporate agenda-setters. Methodologically, we develop a framework that contains six criteria and nine indicators, which allow us to code and assess the certification standards. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews, group discussions, and participatory observations in order to better understand whose agendas certification is promulgating. The criteria encompass the social and environmental dimensions of water sustainability. Our cases include Naturland (a private organic standard), the European Union (EU) Organic Regulation (a public organic standard), the Fairtrade Labeling Organization (FLO) (a fair trade initiative), and the Fair for Life (FFL) standard (an organic and fair trade standard). Our study also looks at the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) and Cotton made in Africa (CmiA), which are two multi-stakeholder initiatives that operate on the conventional market in cooperation with non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The findings demonstrate that organic and fair trade companies rightly present themselves as water policy entrepreneurs. However, crucial aspects of water sustainability remain hidden. In particular, there is a cleavage between the environmental agendas of organic movements and NGOs that are represented in certification and the urgent social water problems in the Global South.
topic cotton
certification
water sustainability
agenda setting
water governance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/297
work_keys_str_mv AT laurakemper savingwaterwhiledoingbusinesscorporateagendasettingandwatersustainability
AT lenapartzsch savingwaterwhiledoingbusinesscorporateagendasettingandwatersustainability
_version_ 1724997404423356416