Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.

Listeners are able to cope with between-speaker variability in speech that stems from anatomical sources (i.e. individual and sex differences in vocal tract size) and sociolinguistic sources (i.e. accents). We hypothesized that listeners adapt to these two types of variation differently because prio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buddhamas Kriengwatana, Josephine Terry, Kateřina Chládková, Paola Escudero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4911083?pdf=render
id doaj-d3675013d5e6485a948458a3643214a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d3675013d5e6485a948458a3643214a52020-11-25T02:13:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015687010.1371/journal.pone.0156870Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.Buddhamas KriengwatanaJosephine TerryKateřina ChládkováPaola EscuderoListeners are able to cope with between-speaker variability in speech that stems from anatomical sources (i.e. individual and sex differences in vocal tract size) and sociolinguistic sources (i.e. accents). We hypothesized that listeners adapt to these two types of variation differently because prior work indicates that adapting to speaker/sex variability may occur pre-lexically while adapting to accent variability may require learning from attention to explicit cues (i.e. feedback). In Experiment 1, we tested our hypothesis by training native Dutch listeners and Australian-English (AusE) listeners without any experience with Dutch or Flemish to discriminate between the Dutch vowels /I/ and /ε/ from a single speaker. We then tested their ability to classify /I/ and /ε/ vowels of a novel Dutch speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change only), or vowels of a novel Flemish speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change plus accent change). We found that both Dutch and AusE listeners could successfully categorize vowels if the change involved a speaker/sex change, but not if the change involved an accent change. When AusE listeners were given feedback on their categorization responses to the novel speaker in Experiment 2, they were able to successfully categorize vowels involving an accent change. These results suggest that adapting to accents may be a two-step process, whereby the first step involves adapting to speaker differences at a pre-lexical level, and the second step involves adapting to accent differences at a contextual level, where listeners have access to word meaning or are given feedback that allows them to appropriately adjust their perceptual category boundaries.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4911083?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Buddhamas Kriengwatana
Josephine Terry
Kateřina Chládková
Paola Escudero
spellingShingle Buddhamas Kriengwatana
Josephine Terry
Kateřina Chládková
Paola Escudero
Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Buddhamas Kriengwatana
Josephine Terry
Kateřina Chládková
Paola Escudero
author_sort Buddhamas Kriengwatana
title Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
title_short Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
title_full Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
title_fullStr Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
title_full_unstemmed Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
title_sort speaker and accent variation are handled differently: evidence in native and non-native listeners.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Listeners are able to cope with between-speaker variability in speech that stems from anatomical sources (i.e. individual and sex differences in vocal tract size) and sociolinguistic sources (i.e. accents). We hypothesized that listeners adapt to these two types of variation differently because prior work indicates that adapting to speaker/sex variability may occur pre-lexically while adapting to accent variability may require learning from attention to explicit cues (i.e. feedback). In Experiment 1, we tested our hypothesis by training native Dutch listeners and Australian-English (AusE) listeners without any experience with Dutch or Flemish to discriminate between the Dutch vowels /I/ and /ε/ from a single speaker. We then tested their ability to classify /I/ and /ε/ vowels of a novel Dutch speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change only), or vowels of a novel Flemish speaker (i.e. speaker or sex change plus accent change). We found that both Dutch and AusE listeners could successfully categorize vowels if the change involved a speaker/sex change, but not if the change involved an accent change. When AusE listeners were given feedback on their categorization responses to the novel speaker in Experiment 2, they were able to successfully categorize vowels involving an accent change. These results suggest that adapting to accents may be a two-step process, whereby the first step involves adapting to speaker differences at a pre-lexical level, and the second step involves adapting to accent differences at a contextual level, where listeners have access to word meaning or are given feedback that allows them to appropriately adjust their perceptual category boundaries.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4911083?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT buddhamaskriengwatana speakerandaccentvariationarehandleddifferentlyevidenceinnativeandnonnativelisteners
AT josephineterry speakerandaccentvariationarehandleddifferentlyevidenceinnativeandnonnativelisteners
AT katerinachladkova speakerandaccentvariationarehandleddifferentlyevidenceinnativeandnonnativelisteners
AT paolaescudero speakerandaccentvariationarehandleddifferentlyevidenceinnativeandnonnativelisteners
_version_ 1724905883726512128