Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party

Listeners with normal hearing show considerable individual differences in speech understanding when competing speakers are present, as in a crowded restaurant. Here, we show that one source of this variance are individual differences in the ability to focus selective attention on a target stimulus i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Oberfeld, Felicitas Klöckner-Nowotny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2016-08-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/16747
id doaj-d36274c8a5c0451eb82150057ecfe5c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d36274c8a5c0451eb82150057ecfe5c22021-05-05T00:33:43ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2016-08-01510.7554/eLife.16747Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail partyDaniel Oberfeld0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-3309Felicitas Klöckner-Nowotny1Department of Psychology, Section Experimental Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Section Experimental Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, GermanyListeners with normal hearing show considerable individual differences in speech understanding when competing speakers are present, as in a crowded restaurant. Here, we show that one source of this variance are individual differences in the ability to focus selective attention on a target stimulus in the presence of distractors. In 50 young normal-hearing listeners, the performance in tasks measuring auditory and visual selective attention was associated with sentence identification in the presence of spatially separated competing speakers. Together, the measures of selective attention explained a similar proportion of variance as the binaural sensitivity for the acoustic temporal fine structure. Working memory span, age, and audiometric thresholds showed no significant association with speech understanding. These results suggest that a reduced ability to focus attention on a target is one reason why some listeners with normal hearing sensitivity have difficulty communicating in situations with background noise.https://elifesciences.org/articles/16747speech-in-noise identificationauditory selective attentionvisual attentiontemporal fine structure sensitivityindividual differencesworking memory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Oberfeld
Felicitas Klöckner-Nowotny
spellingShingle Daniel Oberfeld
Felicitas Klöckner-Nowotny
Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
eLife
speech-in-noise identification
auditory selective attention
visual attention
temporal fine structure sensitivity
individual differences
working memory
author_facet Daniel Oberfeld
Felicitas Klöckner-Nowotny
author_sort Daniel Oberfeld
title Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
title_short Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
title_full Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
title_fullStr Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
title_sort individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Listeners with normal hearing show considerable individual differences in speech understanding when competing speakers are present, as in a crowded restaurant. Here, we show that one source of this variance are individual differences in the ability to focus selective attention on a target stimulus in the presence of distractors. In 50 young normal-hearing listeners, the performance in tasks measuring auditory and visual selective attention was associated with sentence identification in the presence of spatially separated competing speakers. Together, the measures of selective attention explained a similar proportion of variance as the binaural sensitivity for the acoustic temporal fine structure. Working memory span, age, and audiometric thresholds showed no significant association with speech understanding. These results suggest that a reduced ability to focus attention on a target is one reason why some listeners with normal hearing sensitivity have difficulty communicating in situations with background noise.
topic speech-in-noise identification
auditory selective attention
visual attention
temporal fine structure sensitivity
individual differences
working memory
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/16747
work_keys_str_mv AT danieloberfeld individualdifferencesinselectiveattentionpredictspeechidentificationatacocktailparty
AT felicitasklocknernowotny individualdifferencesinselectiveattentionpredictspeechidentificationatacocktailparty
_version_ 1721476312321753088