Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences

Rising acceptance of mothers' labor force participation is often considered evidence of increased support for gender equality. This approach overlooks perceptions of appropriate behavior for men and gender dynamics within families. We use nationally representative data of 12th-grade students fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brittany N. Dernberger, Joanna R. Pepin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2020-01-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v7-2-36/
id doaj-d35d1db13e994bc285f02141bd6e9650
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d35d1db13e994bc285f02141bd6e96502020-11-25T01:51:48ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962330-66962020-01-0172365610.15195/v7.a2Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor PreferencesBrittany N. Dernberger0Joanna R. Pepin1University of MarylandUniversity of Texas at AustinRising acceptance of mothers' labor force participation is often considered evidence of increased support for gender equality. This approach overlooks perceptions of appropriate behavior for men and gender dynamics within families. We use nationally representative data of 12th-grade students from Monitoring the Future surveys (1976 to 2014) to evaluate changes in youths' preferred division of labor arrangements. Over this period, contemporary young people exhibited greater openness to a variety of division of labor scenarios for their future selves as parents, although the husband-as-earner/wife-as-homemaker arrangement remained most desired. Using latent class analysis, we identify six configurations of gender attitudes: conventionalists, neotraditionalists, conventional realists, dual earners, intensive parents, and strong intensive parents. There are no gender egalitarian configurations—exhibiting equal support for both parents’ time at work and time at home. Our findings indicate researchers must distinguish between adoption of gender egalitarian principles and gender flexibility in dividing time at work and at home.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v7-2-36/genderfamilyworking parentsinequalitiesattitudesdivision of labor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brittany N. Dernberger
Joanna R. Pepin
spellingShingle Brittany N. Dernberger
Joanna R. Pepin
Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences
Sociological Science
gender
family
working parents
inequalities
attitudes
division of labor
author_facet Brittany N. Dernberger
Joanna R. Pepin
author_sort Brittany N. Dernberger
title Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences
title_short Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences
title_full Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences
title_fullStr Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Gender Flexibility, but not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences
title_sort gender flexibility, but not equality: young adults’ division of labor preferences
publisher Society for Sociological Science
series Sociological Science
issn 2330-6696
2330-6696
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Rising acceptance of mothers' labor force participation is often considered evidence of increased support for gender equality. This approach overlooks perceptions of appropriate behavior for men and gender dynamics within families. We use nationally representative data of 12th-grade students from Monitoring the Future surveys (1976 to 2014) to evaluate changes in youths' preferred division of labor arrangements. Over this period, contemporary young people exhibited greater openness to a variety of division of labor scenarios for their future selves as parents, although the husband-as-earner/wife-as-homemaker arrangement remained most desired. Using latent class analysis, we identify six configurations of gender attitudes: conventionalists, neotraditionalists, conventional realists, dual earners, intensive parents, and strong intensive parents. There are no gender egalitarian configurations—exhibiting equal support for both parents’ time at work and time at home. Our findings indicate researchers must distinguish between adoption of gender egalitarian principles and gender flexibility in dividing time at work and at home.
topic gender
family
working parents
inequalities
attitudes
division of labor
url https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v7-2-36/
work_keys_str_mv AT brittanyndernberger genderflexibilitybutnotequalityyoungadultsdivisionoflaborpreferences
AT joannarpepin genderflexibilitybutnotequalityyoungadultsdivisionoflaborpreferences
_version_ 1724996184504795136