Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle

Context: Ivermectin (IVM) and fluazuron are present as novel combinations to control ticks. Differences in formulations account for changes to the plasma kinetics and could change exposure of target parasites to active drugs. Aims: To evaluate bioequivalence for ivermectin administered by two nov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego M. Robaina, Silvana Alvariza, Gonzalo Suárez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academic Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences from Antofagasta (ASOCIFA) 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jppres.com/jppres/pdf/vol9/jppres20.955_9.1.88.pdf
id doaj-d347a0f5554147c890d1584a1e68978f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d347a0f5554147c890d1584a1e68978f2020-11-25T04:09:11ZengAcademic Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences from Antofagasta (ASOCIFA)Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research0719-42502021-01-01918897Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattleDiego M. Robaina0Silvana Alvariza1Gonzalo Suárez2Departamento de Clínicas y Hospital Veterinario, Unidad de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República. Alberto Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo, Uruguay.Departamento de Clínicas y Hospital Veterinario, Unidad de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República. Alberto Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo, Uruguay.Departamento de Clínicas y Hospital Veterinario, Unidad de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República. Alberto Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo, Uruguay.Context: Ivermectin (IVM) and fluazuron are present as novel combinations to control ticks. Differences in formulations account for changes to the plasma kinetics and could change exposure of target parasites to active drugs. Aims: To evaluate bioequivalence for ivermectin administered by two novel formulations combined with fluazuron. Methods: Twelve male Holstein calves were randomized into two groups (n=6), receiving a single subcutaneous dose of a novel formulation (A or B) of ivermectin combined with fluazuron (ivermectin 1% 0.2 mg/kg + fluazuron 12.5% 2.5 mg/kg). Blood samples were taken until 34 days after dosing. Non-compartmental analysis was applied for bioequivalence assessment. Compartmental analysis was carried out and model acceptance was validated using the visual predictive check graphics. Results: Noncompartmental analysis shows that both formulations behaved similarly with Cmax ratio of 0.982 (CI90: 0.861 – 1.12, ANOVA test, p=0.814) and AUC0-t ratio of 1.01 (CI90: 0.97 – 1.05, ANOVA, p=0.586) but at different Tmax (1.4 ± 0.5 and 2.9 ± 1.2 days (Mann-Whitney U test, p=0.027) for A and B, respectively). The pharmacokinetic model has two compartments, linear elimination with first order absorption and formulation as covariable for the absorption rate. Conclusions: We conclude that the two novel formulations combined of IVM 1% with fluazuron 12.5%, are bioequivalent for administration of IVM in cattle. This shows that carrying out bioequivalence studies are of great importance for understanding the potential interchangeability between formulations available in the pharmaceutical market.http://jppres.com/jppres/pdf/vol9/jppres20.955_9.1.88.pdfbioavailabilityectoparasitespharmacometricsticks
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diego M. Robaina
Silvana Alvariza
Gonzalo Suárez
spellingShingle Diego M. Robaina
Silvana Alvariza
Gonzalo Suárez
Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research
bioavailability
ectoparasites
pharmacometrics
ticks
author_facet Diego M. Robaina
Silvana Alvariza
Gonzalo Suárez
author_sort Diego M. Robaina
title Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
title_short Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
title_full Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
title_fullStr Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
title_full_unstemmed Bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
title_sort bioequivalence of two novel formulations of ivermectin 1% combined with fluazuron 12.5% for subcutaneous administration in cattle
publisher Academic Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences from Antofagasta (ASOCIFA)
series Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research
issn 0719-4250
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Context: Ivermectin (IVM) and fluazuron are present as novel combinations to control ticks. Differences in formulations account for changes to the plasma kinetics and could change exposure of target parasites to active drugs. Aims: To evaluate bioequivalence for ivermectin administered by two novel formulations combined with fluazuron. Methods: Twelve male Holstein calves were randomized into two groups (n=6), receiving a single subcutaneous dose of a novel formulation (A or B) of ivermectin combined with fluazuron (ivermectin 1% 0.2 mg/kg + fluazuron 12.5% 2.5 mg/kg). Blood samples were taken until 34 days after dosing. Non-compartmental analysis was applied for bioequivalence assessment. Compartmental analysis was carried out and model acceptance was validated using the visual predictive check graphics. Results: Noncompartmental analysis shows that both formulations behaved similarly with Cmax ratio of 0.982 (CI90: 0.861 – 1.12, ANOVA test, p=0.814) and AUC0-t ratio of 1.01 (CI90: 0.97 – 1.05, ANOVA, p=0.586) but at different Tmax (1.4 ± 0.5 and 2.9 ± 1.2 days (Mann-Whitney U test, p=0.027) for A and B, respectively). The pharmacokinetic model has two compartments, linear elimination with first order absorption and formulation as covariable for the absorption rate. Conclusions: We conclude that the two novel formulations combined of IVM 1% with fluazuron 12.5%, are bioequivalent for administration of IVM in cattle. This shows that carrying out bioequivalence studies are of great importance for understanding the potential interchangeability between formulations available in the pharmaceutical market.
topic bioavailability
ectoparasites
pharmacometrics
ticks
url http://jppres.com/jppres/pdf/vol9/jppres20.955_9.1.88.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT diegomrobaina bioequivalenceoftwonovelformulationsofivermectin1combinedwithfluazuron125forsubcutaneousadministrationincattle
AT silvanaalvariza bioequivalenceoftwonovelformulationsofivermectin1combinedwithfluazuron125forsubcutaneousadministrationincattle
AT gonzalosuarez bioequivalenceoftwonovelformulationsofivermectin1combinedwithfluazuron125forsubcutaneousadministrationincattle
_version_ 1724422885071650816