Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Abstract Background Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Il-Gyu Ko, Sung-Eun Kim, Bok Soon Chang, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Phil Shin, Joung Il Lee, Sang Hyun Kim, Jin Hee Han, Jung Won Jeon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4
id doaj-d345bd136052479da8bb3de9177c4088
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d345bd136052479da8bb3de9177c40882020-11-25T03:42:47ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2017-12-011711810.1186/s12876-017-0716-4Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleedingIl-Gyu Ko0Sung-Eun Kim1Bok Soon Chang2Min Seob Kwak3Jin Young Yoon4Jae Myung Cha5Hyun Phil Shin6Joung Il Lee7Sang Hyun Kim8Jin Hee Han9Jung Won Jeon10Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee UniversityAbstract Background Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of interventions and the 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB. Methods Patients who visited the emergency room with UGIB from January 2007 to June 2016 were included. GBS, mGBS, and Pre-E RS were obtained for all patients. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the scoring systems to determine the need for interventions and 30-day mortality. Also, we investigated the potential cutoff scores for predicting 30-day mortality and the need for interventions. Results In predicting the need for interventions, GBS (AUC = 0.727) and mGBS (AUC = 0.733) outperformed Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.564, P < 0.0001). In predicting 30-day mortality, Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.929) outperformed GBS (AUC = 0.664, P < 0.0001) and mGBS (AUC = 0.652, P < 0.0001). Based on AUC analyses of sensitivities and specificities, the optimal cutoff mGBS and GBS for the need for interventions was 9 (70.71% sensitivity, 89.35% specificity) and 9 (73.57% sensitivity, 82.90% specificity) respectively, and optimal cutoff Pre-E RS for 30-day mortality was 4 (88.0% sensitivity, 97.52% specificity). Conclusions GBS and mGBS are considered to be moderately accurate in making an early decision about the need of interventions in patients with UGIB. Pre-E RS is considered to be highly accurate in early detection of patients at high risk for 30-day mortality without endoscopic findings. In addition, we suggested potential cutoff scores to predict the need of interventions for GBS and mGBS, and 30-day mortality for Pre-E RS. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of results.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4Upper gastrointestinal bleedingNeed of interventions30-day mortalityPredictionScoring system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Il-Gyu Ko
Sung-Eun Kim
Bok Soon Chang
Min Seob Kwak
Jin Young Yoon
Jae Myung Cha
Hyun Phil Shin
Joung Il Lee
Sang Hyun Kim
Jin Hee Han
Jung Won Jeon
spellingShingle Il-Gyu Ko
Sung-Eun Kim
Bok Soon Chang
Min Seob Kwak
Jin Young Yoon
Jae Myung Cha
Hyun Phil Shin
Joung Il Lee
Sang Hyun Kim
Jin Hee Han
Jung Won Jeon
Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
BMC Gastroenterology
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Need of interventions
30-day mortality
Prediction
Scoring system
author_facet Il-Gyu Ko
Sung-Eun Kim
Bok Soon Chang
Min Seob Kwak
Jin Young Yoon
Jae Myung Cha
Hyun Phil Shin
Joung Il Lee
Sang Hyun Kim
Jin Hee Han
Jung Won Jeon
author_sort Il-Gyu Ko
title Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_short Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_fullStr Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_sort evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background Risk scoring systems are used to evaluate patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS), and Pre-endoscopy Rockall score (Pre-E RS) for immediate application without endoscopic findings in predicting the need of interventions and the 30-day mortality in patients with UGIB. Methods Patients who visited the emergency room with UGIB from January 2007 to June 2016 were included. GBS, mGBS, and Pre-E RS were obtained for all patients. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the scoring systems to determine the need for interventions and 30-day mortality. Also, we investigated the potential cutoff scores for predicting 30-day mortality and the need for interventions. Results In predicting the need for interventions, GBS (AUC = 0.727) and mGBS (AUC = 0.733) outperformed Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.564, P < 0.0001). In predicting 30-day mortality, Pre-E RS (AUC = 0.929) outperformed GBS (AUC = 0.664, P < 0.0001) and mGBS (AUC = 0.652, P < 0.0001). Based on AUC analyses of sensitivities and specificities, the optimal cutoff mGBS and GBS for the need for interventions was 9 (70.71% sensitivity, 89.35% specificity) and 9 (73.57% sensitivity, 82.90% specificity) respectively, and optimal cutoff Pre-E RS for 30-day mortality was 4 (88.0% sensitivity, 97.52% specificity). Conclusions GBS and mGBS are considered to be moderately accurate in making an early decision about the need of interventions in patients with UGIB. Pre-E RS is considered to be highly accurate in early detection of patients at high risk for 30-day mortality without endoscopic findings. In addition, we suggested potential cutoff scores to predict the need of interventions for GBS and mGBS, and 30-day mortality for Pre-E RS. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical applicability of results.
topic Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Need of interventions
30-day mortality
Prediction
Scoring system
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-017-0716-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ilgyuko evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT sungeunkim evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT boksoonchang evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT minseobkwak evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT jinyoungyoon evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT jaemyungcha evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT hyunphilshin evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT joungillee evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT sanghyunkim evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT jinheehan evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT jungwonjeon evaluationofscoringsystemswithoutendoscopicfindingsforpredictingoutcomesinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
_version_ 1724523623540064256