Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study

Background: In the UK, about 2.3 million people each year require intervention for wax impaction, while otitis externa accounts for just over 1% of general practice consultations. Aural microsuction of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ear, nose, and throat (ENT)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruairi Hasson, Eoin McDermott, Karena Hanley, Camilla Carroll, Claire Collins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2019-01-01
Series:BJGP Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/2/bjgpopen19X101649
id doaj-d331ef4791ce43f78dd7decc6ec2c1cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d331ef4791ce43f78dd7decc6ec2c1cb2020-11-25T01:33:25ZengRoyal College of General PractitionersBJGP Open2398-37952019-01-013210.3399/bjgpopen19X101649Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative studyRuairi Hasson0Eoin McDermott1Karena Hanley2Camilla Carroll3Claire Collins4Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandRoyal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, IrelandIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandBackground: In the UK, about 2.3 million people each year require intervention for wax impaction, while otitis externa accounts for just over 1% of general practice consultations. Aural microsuction of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) outpatient clinic. This article examines the patient acceptability of an aural microsuction service delivered in general practice. Aim: To determine patient satisfaction following the introduction of a new microsuction service in general practice compared with a hospital-delivered service. Design & setting: This is a prospective comparative study in two rural general practices in Ireland and the emergency department (ED) of the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH), Dublin. Method: A 3-month period of data collection on usual care of 56 patients in general practice was followed by a 3-month period of GP-intervention data collection on 67 patients. Comparative data were collected on 37 patients who attended the RVEEH for the same intervention procedure. Patients completed a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-18). Results: Both general practice groups scored significantly higher in all seven aspects of medical care than the RVEEH cohort. Patients in the GP-intervention group scored significantly higher in terms of satisfaction with procedure technique compared with the usual care GP group. Conclusion: The provision of microsuction as a service in general practice confers as much or more patient satisfaction as the provision of the service in a hospital setting.https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/2/bjgpopen19X101649patient satisfactiongeneral practiceotolaryngologycerumenotitis externadelivery of health care, integrated
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ruairi Hasson
Eoin McDermott
Karena Hanley
Camilla Carroll
Claire Collins
spellingShingle Ruairi Hasson
Eoin McDermott
Karena Hanley
Camilla Carroll
Claire Collins
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
BJGP Open
patient satisfaction
general practice
otolaryngology
cerumen
otitis externa
delivery of health care, integrated
author_facet Ruairi Hasson
Eoin McDermott
Karena Hanley
Camilla Carroll
Claire Collins
author_sort Ruairi Hasson
title Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
title_short Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
title_full Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
title_fullStr Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
title_sort assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
series BJGP Open
issn 2398-3795
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: In the UK, about 2.3 million people each year require intervention for wax impaction, while otitis externa accounts for just over 1% of general practice consultations. Aural microsuction of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) outpatient clinic. This article examines the patient acceptability of an aural microsuction service delivered in general practice. Aim: To determine patient satisfaction following the introduction of a new microsuction service in general practice compared with a hospital-delivered service. Design & setting: This is a prospective comparative study in two rural general practices in Ireland and the emergency department (ED) of the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH), Dublin. Method: A 3-month period of data collection on usual care of 56 patients in general practice was followed by a 3-month period of GP-intervention data collection on 67 patients. Comparative data were collected on 37 patients who attended the RVEEH for the same intervention procedure. Patients completed a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-18). Results: Both general practice groups scored significantly higher in all seven aspects of medical care than the RVEEH cohort. Patients in the GP-intervention group scored significantly higher in terms of satisfaction with procedure technique compared with the usual care GP group. Conclusion: The provision of microsuction as a service in general practice confers as much or more patient satisfaction as the provision of the service in a hospital setting.
topic patient satisfaction
general practice
otolaryngology
cerumen
otitis externa
delivery of health care, integrated
url https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/2/bjgpopen19X101649
work_keys_str_mv AT ruairihasson assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy
AT eoinmcdermott assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy
AT karenahanley assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy
AT camillacarroll assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy
AT clairecollins assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy
_version_ 1725077343423168512