Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study
Background: In the UK, about 2.3 million people each year require intervention for wax impaction, while otitis externa accounts for just over 1% of general practice consultations. Aural microsuction of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ear, nose, and throat (ENT)...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2019-01-01
|
Series: | BJGP Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/2/bjgpopen19X101649 |
id |
doaj-d331ef4791ce43f78dd7decc6ec2c1cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d331ef4791ce43f78dd7decc6ec2c1cb2020-11-25T01:33:25ZengRoyal College of General PractitionersBJGP Open2398-37952019-01-013210.3399/bjgpopen19X101649Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative studyRuairi Hasson0Eoin McDermott1Karena Hanley2Camilla Carroll3Claire Collins4Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandRoyal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, IrelandIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, IrelandBackground: In the UK, about 2.3 million people each year require intervention for wax impaction, while otitis externa accounts for just over 1% of general practice consultations. Aural microsuction of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) outpatient clinic. This article examines the patient acceptability of an aural microsuction service delivered in general practice. Aim: To determine patient satisfaction following the introduction of a new microsuction service in general practice compared with a hospital-delivered service. Design & setting: This is a prospective comparative study in two rural general practices in Ireland and the emergency department (ED) of the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH), Dublin. Method: A 3-month period of data collection on usual care of 56 patients in general practice was followed by a 3-month period of GP-intervention data collection on 67 patients. Comparative data were collected on 37 patients who attended the RVEEH for the same intervention procedure. Patients completed a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-18). Results: Both general practice groups scored significantly higher in all seven aspects of medical care than the RVEEH cohort. Patients in the GP-intervention group scored significantly higher in terms of satisfaction with procedure technique compared with the usual care GP group. Conclusion: The provision of microsuction as a service in general practice confers as much or more patient satisfaction as the provision of the service in a hospital setting.https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/2/bjgpopen19X101649patient satisfactiongeneral practiceotolaryngologycerumenotitis externadelivery of health care, integrated |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ruairi Hasson Eoin McDermott Karena Hanley Camilla Carroll Claire Collins |
spellingShingle |
Ruairi Hasson Eoin McDermott Karena Hanley Camilla Carroll Claire Collins Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study BJGP Open patient satisfaction general practice otolaryngology cerumen otitis externa delivery of health care, integrated |
author_facet |
Ruairi Hasson Eoin McDermott Karena Hanley Camilla Carroll Claire Collins |
author_sort |
Ruairi Hasson |
title |
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study |
title_short |
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study |
title_full |
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study |
title_sort |
assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study |
publisher |
Royal College of General Practitioners |
series |
BJGP Open |
issn |
2398-3795 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Background: In the UK, about 2.3 million people each year require intervention for wax impaction, while otitis externa accounts for just over 1% of general practice consultations. Aural microsuction of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) outpatient clinic. This article examines the patient acceptability of an aural microsuction service delivered in general practice. Aim: To determine patient satisfaction following the introduction of a new microsuction service in general practice compared with a hospital-delivered service. Design & setting: This is a prospective comparative study in two rural general practices in Ireland and the emergency department (ED) of the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH), Dublin. Method: A 3-month period of data collection on usual care of 56 patients in general practice was followed by a 3-month period of GP-intervention data collection on 67 patients. Comparative data were collected on 37 patients who attended the RVEEH for the same intervention procedure. Patients completed a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ-18). Results: Both general practice groups scored significantly higher in all seven aspects of medical care than the RVEEH cohort. Patients in the GP-intervention group scored significantly higher in terms of satisfaction with procedure technique compared with the usual care GP group. Conclusion: The provision of microsuction as a service in general practice confers as much or more patient satisfaction as the provision of the service in a hospital setting. |
topic |
patient satisfaction general practice otolaryngology cerumen otitis externa delivery of health care, integrated |
url |
https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/2/bjgpopen19X101649 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ruairihasson assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy AT eoinmcdermott assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy AT karenahanley assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy AT camillacarroll assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy AT clairecollins assessingpatientsatisfactionwithamicrosuctionserviceingeneralpracticeacomparativestudy |
_version_ |
1725077343423168512 |