Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment

Sonja M Maul1, Julie A Devine2, Carolyn R Wincer31St. Luke’s Idaho Elks Rehabilitative Services, Boise, ID, USA; 2Center for Wound Care, Butler Memorial Hospital, Butler, PA, USA; 3Centers for Rehabilitation Services, Gibsonia, PA, USAAbstract: The results of three patients with diffic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonja M Maul, Julie A Devine, Carolyn R Wincer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2009-12-01
Series:Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/development-of-a-framework-for-pneumatic-device-selection-for-lymphede-a3802
id doaj-d330bba045234b7a8f97448f0786957a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d330bba045234b7a8f97448f0786957a2020-11-24T20:40:25ZengDove Medical PressMedical Devices : Evidence and Research1179-14702009-12-012009default5765Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatmentSonja M MaulJulie A DevineCarolyn R WincerSonja M Maul1, Julie A Devine2, Carolyn R Wincer31St. Luke’s Idaho Elks Rehabilitative Services, Boise, ID, USA; 2Center for Wound Care, Butler Memorial Hospital, Butler, PA, USA; 3Centers for Rehabilitation Services, Gibsonia, PA, USAAbstract: The results of three patients with difficult to manage leg and trunk lymphedema are reported. Patients were treated with the current standard of care: combined decongestive therapy. All three patients met obstacles in achieving independent self-care, which impeded their discharge to home care. The use of two currently available programmable pneumatic compression devices (PCDs) was investigated to determine if these devices could enable these difficult-to-manage patients to meet their discharge goals. Results indicate that programmable PCDs can be effective in managing complicated cases of leg and trunk lymphedema, and that differences may exist between devices. In this trial, the device with lower applied pressures and smaller pneumatic chambers provided better tolerated treatment and overall better patient outcomes. These three case reports show that in-home use of an appropriate PCD can help patients with stage 3 and advanced stage 2 lymphedema achieve stable limb volumes with no exacerbation of lymphedema-related symptoms. Results also demonstrate the ability of patients to consistently use programmable PCDs in a home environment. The results are presented in a structured decision-making framework to aid the therapist and physician in selecting appropriate patients for home PCD lymphedema therapy, and in the selection of an appropriate PCD.Keywords: lymphedema, swelling, pneumatic, compression, flexitouch, lympha press. http://www.dovepress.com/development-of-a-framework-for-pneumatic-device-selection-for-lymphede-a3802
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonja M Maul
Julie A Devine
Carolyn R Wincer
spellingShingle Sonja M Maul
Julie A Devine
Carolyn R Wincer
Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
author_facet Sonja M Maul
Julie A Devine
Carolyn R Wincer
author_sort Sonja M Maul
title Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
title_short Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
title_full Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
title_fullStr Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
title_full_unstemmed Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
title_sort development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
issn 1179-1470
publishDate 2009-12-01
description Sonja M Maul1, Julie A Devine2, Carolyn R Wincer31St. Luke’s Idaho Elks Rehabilitative Services, Boise, ID, USA; 2Center for Wound Care, Butler Memorial Hospital, Butler, PA, USA; 3Centers for Rehabilitation Services, Gibsonia, PA, USAAbstract: The results of three patients with difficult to manage leg and trunk lymphedema are reported. Patients were treated with the current standard of care: combined decongestive therapy. All three patients met obstacles in achieving independent self-care, which impeded their discharge to home care. The use of two currently available programmable pneumatic compression devices (PCDs) was investigated to determine if these devices could enable these difficult-to-manage patients to meet their discharge goals. Results indicate that programmable PCDs can be effective in managing complicated cases of leg and trunk lymphedema, and that differences may exist between devices. In this trial, the device with lower applied pressures and smaller pneumatic chambers provided better tolerated treatment and overall better patient outcomes. These three case reports show that in-home use of an appropriate PCD can help patients with stage 3 and advanced stage 2 lymphedema achieve stable limb volumes with no exacerbation of lymphedema-related symptoms. Results also demonstrate the ability of patients to consistently use programmable PCDs in a home environment. The results are presented in a structured decision-making framework to aid the therapist and physician in selecting appropriate patients for home PCD lymphedema therapy, and in the selection of an appropriate PCD.Keywords: lymphedema, swelling, pneumatic, compression, flexitouch, lympha press.
url http://www.dovepress.com/development-of-a-framework-for-pneumatic-device-selection-for-lymphede-a3802
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjammaul developmentofaframeworkforpneumaticdeviceselectionforlymphedematreatment
AT julieadevine developmentofaframeworkforpneumaticdeviceselectionforlymphedematreatment
AT carolynrwincer developmentofaframeworkforpneumaticdeviceselectionforlymphedematreatment
_version_ 1716827047626539008