Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?

Abstract Background Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Selberherr, Simon Freermann, Oskar Koperek, Martin B. Niederle, Philipp Riss, Christian Scheuba, Bruno Niederle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Subjects:
NET
NEN
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9
id doaj-d31ed094ee774c1f9b051db5bd2e7498
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d31ed094ee774c1f9b051db5bd2e74982021-01-17T12:10:03ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722021-01-011611610.1186/s13023-021-01677-9Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?Andreas Selberherr0Simon Freermann1Oskar Koperek2Martin B. Niederle3Philipp Riss4Christian Scheuba5Bruno Niederle6Section “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathology, Medical UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversityAbstract Background Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the overall long-term survival of patients with siNENs with and without liver metastasis at initial diagnosis and the possible benefit of surgical treatment as compared to active surveillance of metastases. 123 consecutive patients with siNENs were treated between 1965 and 2016. All clinical and histological records were reevaluated including analysis of the proliferation rates in all specimens. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis for patients with and without liver metastasis and according to the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) of liver metastases if present. Results The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival rate was 89.0%, 68.4%, 52.8% and 31.0% in patients without and 89.5%, 69.5%, 33.2% and 3.6% in those with liver metastases. No statistically significant differences were observed comparing the two groups. Within the group of patients with liver metastases, the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) was in favor of patients undergoing surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastases upon diagnosis was an individual risk factor associated with worse survival. Conclusion The presence of liver metastasis at initial diagnosis does not have a statistically significant influence on survival. Surgery for hepatic metastasis seems to show a benefit for overall survival and may be indicated especially in patients symptomatic due to high tumor burden and serotonin hypersecretion to reduce hormone activity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9Neuroendocrine tumorsNeuroendocrine neoplasiaLivermetastasisNETNENSmall intestine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Selberherr
Simon Freermann
Oskar Koperek
Martin B. Niederle
Philipp Riss
Christian Scheuba
Bruno Niederle
spellingShingle Andreas Selberherr
Simon Freermann
Oskar Koperek
Martin B. Niederle
Philipp Riss
Christian Scheuba
Bruno Niederle
Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Neuroendocrine tumors
Neuroendocrine neoplasia
Livermetastasis
NET
NEN
Small intestine
author_facet Andreas Selberherr
Simon Freermann
Oskar Koperek
Martin B. Niederle
Philipp Riss
Christian Scheuba
Bruno Niederle
author_sort Andreas Selberherr
title Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
title_short Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
title_full Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
title_fullStr Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
title_full_unstemmed Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
title_sort neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: is surgery beneficial for survival?
publisher BMC
series Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
issn 1750-1172
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the overall long-term survival of patients with siNENs with and without liver metastasis at initial diagnosis and the possible benefit of surgical treatment as compared to active surveillance of metastases. 123 consecutive patients with siNENs were treated between 1965 and 2016. All clinical and histological records were reevaluated including analysis of the proliferation rates in all specimens. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis for patients with and without liver metastasis and according to the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) of liver metastases if present. Results The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival rate was 89.0%, 68.4%, 52.8% and 31.0% in patients without and 89.5%, 69.5%, 33.2% and 3.6% in those with liver metastases. No statistically significant differences were observed comparing the two groups. Within the group of patients with liver metastases, the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) was in favor of patients undergoing surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastases upon diagnosis was an individual risk factor associated with worse survival. Conclusion The presence of liver metastasis at initial diagnosis does not have a statistically significant influence on survival. Surgery for hepatic metastasis seems to show a benefit for overall survival and may be indicated especially in patients symptomatic due to high tumor burden and serotonin hypersecretion to reduce hormone activity.
topic Neuroendocrine tumors
Neuroendocrine neoplasia
Livermetastasis
NET
NEN
Small intestine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasselberherr neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
AT simonfreermann neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
AT oskarkoperek neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
AT martinbniederle neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
AT philippriss neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
AT christianscheuba neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
AT brunoniederle neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival
_version_ 1724335302760202240