Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?
Abstract Background Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to e...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9 |
id |
doaj-d31ed094ee774c1f9b051db5bd2e7498 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d31ed094ee774c1f9b051db5bd2e74982021-01-17T12:10:03ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722021-01-011611610.1186/s13023-021-01677-9Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?Andreas Selberherr0Simon Freermann1Oskar Koperek2Martin B. Niederle3Philipp Riss4Christian Scheuba5Bruno Niederle6Section “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversityDepartment of Pathology, Medical UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversitySection “Endocrine Surgery”, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical UniversityAbstract Background Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the overall long-term survival of patients with siNENs with and without liver metastasis at initial diagnosis and the possible benefit of surgical treatment as compared to active surveillance of metastases. 123 consecutive patients with siNENs were treated between 1965 and 2016. All clinical and histological records were reevaluated including analysis of the proliferation rates in all specimens. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis for patients with and without liver metastasis and according to the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) of liver metastases if present. Results The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival rate was 89.0%, 68.4%, 52.8% and 31.0% in patients without and 89.5%, 69.5%, 33.2% and 3.6% in those with liver metastases. No statistically significant differences were observed comparing the two groups. Within the group of patients with liver metastases, the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) was in favor of patients undergoing surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastases upon diagnosis was an individual risk factor associated with worse survival. Conclusion The presence of liver metastasis at initial diagnosis does not have a statistically significant influence on survival. Surgery for hepatic metastasis seems to show a benefit for overall survival and may be indicated especially in patients symptomatic due to high tumor burden and serotonin hypersecretion to reduce hormone activity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9Neuroendocrine tumorsNeuroendocrine neoplasiaLivermetastasisNETNENSmall intestine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreas Selberherr Simon Freermann Oskar Koperek Martin B. Niederle Philipp Riss Christian Scheuba Bruno Niederle |
spellingShingle |
Andreas Selberherr Simon Freermann Oskar Koperek Martin B. Niederle Philipp Riss Christian Scheuba Bruno Niederle Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival? Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Neuroendocrine tumors Neuroendocrine neoplasia Livermetastasis NET NEN Small intestine |
author_facet |
Andreas Selberherr Simon Freermann Oskar Koperek Martin B. Niederle Philipp Riss Christian Scheuba Bruno Niederle |
author_sort |
Andreas Selberherr |
title |
Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival? |
title_short |
Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival? |
title_full |
Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival? |
title_fullStr |
Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival? |
title_sort |
neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: is surgery beneficial for survival? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases |
issn |
1750-1172 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the overall long-term survival of patients with siNENs with and without liver metastasis at initial diagnosis and the possible benefit of surgical treatment as compared to active surveillance of metastases. 123 consecutive patients with siNENs were treated between 1965 and 2016. All clinical and histological records were reevaluated including analysis of the proliferation rates in all specimens. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis for patients with and without liver metastasis and according to the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) of liver metastases if present. Results The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival rate was 89.0%, 68.4%, 52.8% and 31.0% in patients without and 89.5%, 69.5%, 33.2% and 3.6% in those with liver metastases. No statistically significant differences were observed comparing the two groups. Within the group of patients with liver metastases, the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) was in favor of patients undergoing surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastases upon diagnosis was an individual risk factor associated with worse survival. Conclusion The presence of liver metastasis at initial diagnosis does not have a statistically significant influence on survival. Surgery for hepatic metastasis seems to show a benefit for overall survival and may be indicated especially in patients symptomatic due to high tumor burden and serotonin hypersecretion to reduce hormone activity. |
topic |
Neuroendocrine tumors Neuroendocrine neoplasia Livermetastasis NET NEN Small intestine |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasselberherr neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival AT simonfreermann neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival AT oskarkoperek neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival AT martinbniederle neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival AT philippriss neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival AT christianscheuba neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival AT brunoniederle neuroendocrinelivermetastasisfromthesmallintestineissurgerybeneficialforsurvival |
_version_ |
1724335302760202240 |