Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”

This article is devoted to legal progress and metaphors, which describes it. The author proposes to analyze two metaphors - “evolution” and “explosion”. These quasi-concepts are relevant to the study of dialectical interaction between quantity and quality. Thereby most abstract level of philosophica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maksim A Beljaev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2016-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Law
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/14778
id doaj-d31e9747f40a42f2ad909875407abcc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d31e9747f40a42f2ad909875407abcc42020-11-24T21:06:13ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Law2313-23372408-90012016-12-010392014459Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”Maksim A Beljaev0Воронежский государственный университетThis article is devoted to legal progress and metaphors, which describes it. The author proposes to analyze two metaphors - “evolution” and “explosion”. These quasi-concepts are relevant to the study of dialectical interaction between quantity and quality. Thereby most abstract level of philosophical methodology will be applied to the juridicial issues. According to author’s statement, each scientific concept has epistemic and social grounds. Former bound concept with cognitive aspect of legal activity, latter describe communicative characteristics of actors, which activities changed the legal system. As a result, the following conclusions were obtained. On the one hand, because the law has system-ordered configuration and predictable effects, its development can be called “evolution”. On the other hand, since the development of the law is often intermittent, chaotic, unpredictable, it has rightly been compared with the explosion. It is shown that these metaphors reflected of different models of social reality. Different images of social world exists because actors, which created it, occupy different functional position in the structure of society. In this sense, the evolutionary model corresponds to the position of law enforcers, and chaotic - the position of independent theorists. The paradox lies in the fact that in law necessity and contingency coexist peacefully. Thus, the science does not yet have a universal scheme of quantitative and qualitative changes connected in the law. For any specific research tasks to design this connection again, that requires taking into account the mass of cultural, psychological and anthropological data.http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/14778правогосударствоюридическая наукаэволюцияюридификацияразмножение законовправовой взрывсистемный методрациональностьхаосдерегуляция
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maksim A Beljaev
spellingShingle Maksim A Beljaev
Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”
RUDN Journal of Law
право
государство
юридическая наука
эволюция
юридификация
размножение законов
правовой взрыв
системный метод
рациональность
хаос
дерегуляция
author_facet Maksim A Beljaev
author_sort Maksim A Beljaev
title Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”
title_short Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”
title_full Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”
title_fullStr Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”
title_full_unstemmed Model of Legal Progress: from “Evolution” to “Explosion”
title_sort model of legal progress: from “evolution” to “explosion”
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN Journal of Law
issn 2313-2337
2408-9001
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This article is devoted to legal progress and metaphors, which describes it. The author proposes to analyze two metaphors - “evolution” and “explosion”. These quasi-concepts are relevant to the study of dialectical interaction between quantity and quality. Thereby most abstract level of philosophical methodology will be applied to the juridicial issues. According to author’s statement, each scientific concept has epistemic and social grounds. Former bound concept with cognitive aspect of legal activity, latter describe communicative characteristics of actors, which activities changed the legal system. As a result, the following conclusions were obtained. On the one hand, because the law has system-ordered configuration and predictable effects, its development can be called “evolution”. On the other hand, since the development of the law is often intermittent, chaotic, unpredictable, it has rightly been compared with the explosion. It is shown that these metaphors reflected of different models of social reality. Different images of social world exists because actors, which created it, occupy different functional position in the structure of society. In this sense, the evolutionary model corresponds to the position of law enforcers, and chaotic - the position of independent theorists. The paradox lies in the fact that in law necessity and contingency coexist peacefully. Thus, the science does not yet have a universal scheme of quantitative and qualitative changes connected in the law. For any specific research tasks to design this connection again, that requires taking into account the mass of cultural, psychological and anthropological data.
topic право
государство
юридическая наука
эволюция
юридификация
размножение законов
правовой взрыв
системный метод
рациональность
хаос
дерегуляция
url http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/14778
work_keys_str_mv AT maksimabeljaev modeloflegalprogressfromevolutiontoexplosion
_version_ 1716766330383761408