Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies

This paper is about the relation between constitutional orientations with state contract and religious communities through the thesis of: a state which by its constitution protects social plurality, freedom of beliefs and citizen consciousness and which from its institutions and authority separates...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Damir Bulat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu 2018-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/303312
id doaj-d316732661314154b47d9d97689b008f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d316732661314154b47d9d97689b008f2020-11-24T22:48:10ZengPravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu0584-90631847-04592018-01-01553639665Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societiesDamir BulatThis paper is about the relation between constitutional orientations with state contract and religious communities through the thesis of: a state which by its constitution protects social plurality, freedom of beliefs and citizen consciousness and which from its institutions and authority separates religious communities and should not contract with them a model of cooperation which damages or yields a part of constitutionally guaranteed rights. By initiating public debate, an attempt is made to contribute to explain how (un)founded the dilemma is on the possible destruction of human rights caused by exceeding constitution with the legal position of religious communities. The paradox is if the state contract and religious communities destroy human ethics and secular direction because interpretation of one ethic doctrine of human personality opens up several possibilities of legal involution of parts of fundamental and citizen rights. Such a contract points out the incompatibility of constitution with the utilitarianism of co-administrative non-confrontation.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/303312(de) etatizationstate / local public spheresecularismgenerally useful/less)private public spheresubsidiarity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Damir Bulat
spellingShingle Damir Bulat
Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
(de) etatization
state / local public sphere
secularism
generally useful/less)
private public sphere
subsidiarity
author_facet Damir Bulat
author_sort Damir Bulat
title Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
title_short Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
title_full Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
title_fullStr Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
title_full_unstemmed Ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
title_sort ethics - civil right dispute and legal position of religious communities in pluralistic societies
publisher Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu
series Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
issn 0584-9063
1847-0459
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper is about the relation between constitutional orientations with state contract and religious communities through the thesis of: a state which by its constitution protects social plurality, freedom of beliefs and citizen consciousness and which from its institutions and authority separates religious communities and should not contract with them a model of cooperation which damages or yields a part of constitutionally guaranteed rights. By initiating public debate, an attempt is made to contribute to explain how (un)founded the dilemma is on the possible destruction of human rights caused by exceeding constitution with the legal position of religious communities. The paradox is if the state contract and religious communities destroy human ethics and secular direction because interpretation of one ethic doctrine of human personality opens up several possibilities of legal involution of parts of fundamental and citizen rights. Such a contract points out the incompatibility of constitution with the utilitarianism of co-administrative non-confrontation.
topic (de) etatization
state / local public sphere
secularism
generally useful/less)
private public sphere
subsidiarity
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/303312
work_keys_str_mv AT damirbulat ethicscivilrightdisputeandlegalpositionofreligiouscommunitiesinpluralisticsocieties
_version_ 1725679358513774592