Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims

This paper seeks to review the pertinent Myanmar and Bangladesh history in overlapping maritime territorial claims leading up to the September 2011 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) case: Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh and Myanmar in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ravi A. Balaram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-09-01
Series:Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100304
id doaj-d2da87a2f5c745c9956b8f77cbd923e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2da87a2f5c745c9956b8f77cbd923e72020-11-25T03:52:33ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822012-09-013110.1177/186810341203100304Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea ClaimsRavi A. Balaram0MA Candidate for Security Studies at Georgetown University, he focuses on Southeast Asia.This paper seeks to review the pertinent Myanmar and Bangladesh history in overlapping maritime territorial claims leading up to the September 2011 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) case: Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal. It will dissect the legal proceedings as primary source documents and apply the relevant judgement findings to analyse the implications for the respective countries and for South China Sea maritime boundary disputes. While the judgements of this case set certain legal precedents that may be more easily applied to bilateral disputes, the implications, nevertheless, impinge on multilateral claims as well. To the extent that the Bangladesh-Myanmar ITLOS judgement provides a pathway to third-party, independent, and peaceful resolution to the potentially explosive and escalating tensions in the South China Sea, this paper argues that findings are relevant, but limited.https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100304
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ravi A. Balaram
spellingShingle Ravi A. Balaram
Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
author_facet Ravi A. Balaram
author_sort Ravi A. Balaram
title Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
title_short Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
title_full Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
title_fullStr Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
title_full_unstemmed Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
title_sort case study: the myanmar and bangladesh maritime boundary dispute in the bay of bengal and its implications for south china sea claims
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
issn 1868-1034
1868-4882
publishDate 2012-09-01
description This paper seeks to review the pertinent Myanmar and Bangladesh history in overlapping maritime territorial claims leading up to the September 2011 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) case: Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal. It will dissect the legal proceedings as primary source documents and apply the relevant judgement findings to analyse the implications for the respective countries and for South China Sea maritime boundary disputes. While the judgements of this case set certain legal precedents that may be more easily applied to bilateral disputes, the implications, nevertheless, impinge on multilateral claims as well. To the extent that the Bangladesh-Myanmar ITLOS judgement provides a pathway to third-party, independent, and peaceful resolution to the potentially explosive and escalating tensions in the South China Sea, this paper argues that findings are relevant, but limited.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100304
work_keys_str_mv AT raviabalaram casestudythemyanmarandbangladeshmaritimeboundarydisputeinthebayofbengalanditsimplicationsforsouthchinaseaclaims
_version_ 1724482208081641472