Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims
This paper seeks to review the pertinent Myanmar and Bangladesh history in overlapping maritime territorial claims leading up to the September 2011 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) case: Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh and Myanmar in t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100304 |
id |
doaj-d2da87a2f5c745c9956b8f77cbd923e7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d2da87a2f5c745c9956b8f77cbd923e72020-11-25T03:52:33ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822012-09-013110.1177/186810341203100304Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea ClaimsRavi A. Balaram0MA Candidate for Security Studies at Georgetown University, he focuses on Southeast Asia.This paper seeks to review the pertinent Myanmar and Bangladesh history in overlapping maritime territorial claims leading up to the September 2011 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) case: Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal. It will dissect the legal proceedings as primary source documents and apply the relevant judgement findings to analyse the implications for the respective countries and for South China Sea maritime boundary disputes. While the judgements of this case set certain legal precedents that may be more easily applied to bilateral disputes, the implications, nevertheless, impinge on multilateral claims as well. To the extent that the Bangladesh-Myanmar ITLOS judgement provides a pathway to third-party, independent, and peaceful resolution to the potentially explosive and escalating tensions in the South China Sea, this paper argues that findings are relevant, but limited.https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100304 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ravi A. Balaram |
spellingShingle |
Ravi A. Balaram Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
author_facet |
Ravi A. Balaram |
author_sort |
Ravi A. Balaram |
title |
Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims |
title_short |
Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims |
title_full |
Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims |
title_fullStr |
Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims |
title_full_unstemmed |
Case Study: The Myanmar and Bangladesh Maritime Boundary Dispute in the Bay of Bengal and Its Implications for South China Sea Claims |
title_sort |
case study: the myanmar and bangladesh maritime boundary dispute in the bay of bengal and its implications for south china sea claims |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs |
issn |
1868-1034 1868-4882 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
This paper seeks to review the pertinent Myanmar and Bangladesh history in overlapping maritime territorial claims leading up to the September 2011 International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) case: Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal. It will dissect the legal proceedings as primary source documents and apply the relevant judgement findings to analyse the implications for the respective countries and for South China Sea maritime boundary disputes. While the judgements of this case set certain legal precedents that may be more easily applied to bilateral disputes, the implications, nevertheless, impinge on multilateral claims as well. To the extent that the Bangladesh-Myanmar ITLOS judgement provides a pathway to third-party, independent, and peaceful resolution to the potentially explosive and escalating tensions in the South China Sea, this paper argues that findings are relevant, but limited. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100304 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT raviabalaram casestudythemyanmarandbangladeshmaritimeboundarydisputeinthebayofbengalanditsimplicationsforsouthchinaseaclaims |
_version_ |
1724482208081641472 |