In Alzheimer’s Disease, Six-Month Treatment with GLP-1 Analogue Prevents Decline of Brain Glucose Metabolism: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

In animal models, the incretin hormone GLP-1 affects Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We hypothesized that treatment with GLP-1 or an analogue of GLP-1 would prevent accumulation of Aβ and raise, or prevent decline of, glucose metabolism (CMRglc) in AD.In this 26-week trial, we randomized 38 patients with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael eGejl, Albert eGjedde, Lærke eEgefjord, Arne eMøller, Søren B Hansen, Kim eVang, Anders Bertil Rodell, Hans eBraendgaard, Hanne eGottrup, Anna eSchacht, Niels eMøller, Birgitte eBrock, Jørgen eRungby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00108/full
Description
Summary:In animal models, the incretin hormone GLP-1 affects Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We hypothesized that treatment with GLP-1 or an analogue of GLP-1 would prevent accumulation of Aβ and raise, or prevent decline of, glucose metabolism (CMRglc) in AD.In this 26-week trial, we randomized 38 patients with AD to treatment with the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide (n=18), or placebo (n=20). We measured Aβ load in brain with tracer [11C]PIB (PIB), CMRglc with [18F]FDG (FDG), and cognition with the WMS-IV scale (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01469351). The PIB binding increased significantly in temporal lobe in placebo and treatment patients (both P = 0.04), and in occipital lobe in treatment patients (P = 0.04). Regional and global increases of PIB retention did not differ between the groups (P ≥ 0.38). In placebo treated patients CMRglc declined in all regions, significantly so by the following means in precuneus (P = 0.009, 3.2 µmol/hg/min, 95% CI: 5.45; 0.92), and in parietal (P = 0.04, 2.1 µmol/hg/min, 95% CI: 4.21; 0.081), temporal (P = 0.046, 1.54 µmol/hg/min, 95% CI: 3.05; 0.030), and occipital (P = 0.009, 2.10 µmol/hg/min, 95% CI: 3.61; 0.59) lobes, and in cerebellum (P = 0.04, 1.54 µmol/hg/min, 95% CI: 3.01; 0.064). In contrast, the GLP-1 analogue treatment caused a numerical but insignificant increase of CMRglc after 6 months. Cognitive scores did not change.We conclude that the GLP-1 analogue treatment prevented the decline of CMRglc that signifies cognitive impairment, synaptic dysfunction, and disease evolution. We draw no firm conclusions from the Aβ load or cognition measures, for which the study was underpowered.
ISSN:1663-4365