Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study

Abstract Background Coverage is an important indicator to assess both the performance and effectiveness of public health programs. Recommended methods for coverage estimation for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) can involve active and adaptive case finding (AACF), an informant-driven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheila Isanaka, Bethany L. Hedt-Gauthier, Halidou Salou, Fatou Berthé, Rebecca F. Grais, Ben G. S. Allen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4791-9
id doaj-d2af0b4c10fa49daa39912d73a7d8abe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2af0b4c10fa49daa39912d73a7d8abe2020-12-20T12:06:25ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632019-12-011911710.1186/s12913-019-4791-9Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture studySheila Isanaka0Bethany L. Hedt-Gauthier1Halidou Salou2Fatou Berthé3Rebecca F. Grais4Ben G. S. Allen5Department of Nutrition and Global Health and Population at Harvard School of Public HealthDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine (Harvard Medical School)Epicentre NigerEpicentre NigeriaDepartment of Research, EpicentreTechnical Rapid Response Team and International Medical CorpsAbstract Background Coverage is an important indicator to assess both the performance and effectiveness of public health programs. Recommended methods for coverage estimation for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) can involve active and adaptive case finding (AACF), an informant-driven sampling procedure, for the identification of cases. However, as this procedure can yield a non-representative sample, exhaustive or near exhaustive case identification is needed for valid coverage estimation with AACF. Important uncertainty remains as to whether an adequate level of exhaustivity for valid coverage estimation can be ensured by AACF. Methods We assessed the sensitivity of AACF and a census method using a capture-recapture design in northwestern Nigeria. Program coverage was estimated for each case finding procedure. Results The sensitivity of AACF was 69.5% (95% CI: 59.8, 79.2) and 91.9% (95% CI: 85.1, 98.8) with census case finding. Program coverage was estimated to be 40.3% (95% CI 28.6, 52.0) using AACF, compared to 34.9% (95% CI 24.7, 45.2) using the census. Depending on the distribution of coverage among missed cases, AACF sensitivity of at least ≥70% was generally required for coverage estimation to remain within ±10% of the census estimate. Conclusion Given the impact incomplete case finding and low sensitivity can have on coverage estimation in potentially non-representative samples, adequate attention and resources should be committed to ensure exhaustive or near exhaustive case finding. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03140904. Registered on May 3, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4791-9Active and adaptiveCase findingCapture recaptureCoverageSevere acute malnutritionSQUEAC
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sheila Isanaka
Bethany L. Hedt-Gauthier
Halidou Salou
Fatou Berthé
Rebecca F. Grais
Ben G. S. Allen
spellingShingle Sheila Isanaka
Bethany L. Hedt-Gauthier
Halidou Salou
Fatou Berthé
Rebecca F. Grais
Ben G. S. Allen
Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
BMC Health Services Research
Active and adaptive
Case finding
Capture recapture
Coverage
Severe acute malnutrition
SQUEAC
author_facet Sheila Isanaka
Bethany L. Hedt-Gauthier
Halidou Salou
Fatou Berthé
Rebecca F. Grais
Ben G. S. Allen
author_sort Sheila Isanaka
title Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
title_short Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
title_full Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
title_fullStr Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
title_full_unstemmed Active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
title_sort active and adaptive case finding to estimate therapeutic program coverage for severe acute malnutrition: a capture-recapture study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background Coverage is an important indicator to assess both the performance and effectiveness of public health programs. Recommended methods for coverage estimation for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) can involve active and adaptive case finding (AACF), an informant-driven sampling procedure, for the identification of cases. However, as this procedure can yield a non-representative sample, exhaustive or near exhaustive case identification is needed for valid coverage estimation with AACF. Important uncertainty remains as to whether an adequate level of exhaustivity for valid coverage estimation can be ensured by AACF. Methods We assessed the sensitivity of AACF and a census method using a capture-recapture design in northwestern Nigeria. Program coverage was estimated for each case finding procedure. Results The sensitivity of AACF was 69.5% (95% CI: 59.8, 79.2) and 91.9% (95% CI: 85.1, 98.8) with census case finding. Program coverage was estimated to be 40.3% (95% CI 28.6, 52.0) using AACF, compared to 34.9% (95% CI 24.7, 45.2) using the census. Depending on the distribution of coverage among missed cases, AACF sensitivity of at least ≥70% was generally required for coverage estimation to remain within ±10% of the census estimate. Conclusion Given the impact incomplete case finding and low sensitivity can have on coverage estimation in potentially non-representative samples, adequate attention and resources should be committed to ensure exhaustive or near exhaustive case finding. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03140904. Registered on May 3, 2017.
topic Active and adaptive
Case finding
Capture recapture
Coverage
Severe acute malnutrition
SQUEAC
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4791-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sheilaisanaka activeandadaptivecasefindingtoestimatetherapeuticprogramcoverageforsevereacutemalnutritionacapturerecapturestudy
AT bethanylhedtgauthier activeandadaptivecasefindingtoestimatetherapeuticprogramcoverageforsevereacutemalnutritionacapturerecapturestudy
AT halidousalou activeandadaptivecasefindingtoestimatetherapeuticprogramcoverageforsevereacutemalnutritionacapturerecapturestudy
AT fatouberthe activeandadaptivecasefindingtoestimatetherapeuticprogramcoverageforsevereacutemalnutritionacapturerecapturestudy
AT rebeccafgrais activeandadaptivecasefindingtoestimatetherapeuticprogramcoverageforsevereacutemalnutritionacapturerecapturestudy
AT bengsallen activeandadaptivecasefindingtoestimatetherapeuticprogramcoverageforsevereacutemalnutritionacapturerecapturestudy
_version_ 1724377112708644864