Privately Owned Public Spaces: the Internet and the Shaping of a New Breed of Consumers. From Participants to Users

<p>Computers in the 1980s were seen as a way to liberate people from the constraints of physicality, to expand the horizons of knowledge, and to enhance access to information. But after a few somersaults, we are back to a market that closes rather than opens our horizons, one that monopolizes,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salvatore Poier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2015-03-01
Series:Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2572376
Description
Summary:<p>Computers in the 1980s were seen as a way to liberate people from the constraints of physicality, to expand the horizons of knowledge, and to enhance access to information. But after a few somersaults, we are back to a market that closes rather than opens our horizons, one that monopolizes, and even de facto owns, our very information. With the adoption of the term &ldquo;user&rdquo; - as opposed to &ldquo;participant&rdquo; for example &ndash; an asymmetry of power is underlined. This linguistic choice enables Internet platforms (such as Twitter, Facebook, iCloud, GoogleDrive) to maintain shady property rights on what users might perceive as public spaces (precisely because they are built to project a public space dynamic) but are in fact spaces in which the control over users' own data (e.g. pictures, texts) is often impossible, transforming such data into a commodity and reducing users to (used) consumers.</p> <hr /><p>En la d&eacute;cada de 1980, los ordenadores se contemplaban como una forma de liberar a la gente de las limitaciones del mundo f&iacute;sico, ampliar los horizontes del conocimiento, y mejorar el acceso a la informaci&oacute;n. Pero despu&eacute;s de diversos giros, volvemos a estar en un mercado que cierra nuestros horizontes en lugar de ampliarlos, que monopoliza, e incluso posee de facto, nuestra propia informaci&oacute;n. Con la adopci&oacute;n del t&eacute;rmino "usuario" - en lugar de "participante", por ejemplo - se pone de manifiesto la asimetr&iacute;a de poder existente. Esta opci&oacute;n ling&uuml;&iacute;stica permite a las plataformas de Internet (como Twitter, Facebook, iCloud, GoogleDrive) mantener derechos de propiedad poco claros sobre plataformas que los usuarios pueden percibir como espacios p&uacute;blicos (precisamente porque est&aacute;n construidas para parecer un espacio p&uacute;blico din&aacute;mico) pero son en realidad espacios en los que es a menudo imposible controlar los propios datos de los usuarios (por ejemplo, im&aacute;genes, textos), transformando estos datos en una mercanc&iacute;a y convirtiendo a los usuarios en consumidores (usados).</p> <p><strong>DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN</strong>: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2572376" target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/abstract=2572376</a></p>
ISSN:2079-5971