Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers

Collaborative actions between citizens and government agencies at the local level have the potential to raise community resilience to climate risks via social learning and increased social capital. However, for these actions to succeed, community members’ values, norms and risk perceptions must supp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivia Jensen, Corinne Ong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3413
id doaj-d297f92a32fa4eb09300239901eb69c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d297f92a32fa4eb09300239901eb69c32020-11-25T02:38:10ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-04-01123413341310.3390/su12083413Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and BarriersOlivia Jensen0Corinne Ong1LRF Institute for the Public Understanding of Risk, National University of Singapore, Innovation 4.0, 3 Research Link, Singapore 117602, SingaporeInstitute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469C Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 117602, SingaporeCollaborative actions between citizens and government agencies at the local level have the potential to raise community resilience to climate risks via social learning and increased social capital. However, for these actions to succeed, community members’ values, norms and risk perceptions must support collaborative action and be accompanied by self-efficacy. This paper develops a theoretical framework linking these concepts and applies the framework to a collaborative climate risk project in Singapore, using qualitative data from focus group discussions. We find that pro-social values are a strong enabling factor for residents to engage in collaboration, but that perceptions of low collective efficacy are a potential barrier. In particular, we find that the relative competence of the government leads to a perception of “exemptionalism,” which undermines individuals’ intentions to devote resources to collaborative action.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3413community resilienceclimate risksocial learningsocial capital
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivia Jensen
Corinne Ong
spellingShingle Olivia Jensen
Corinne Ong
Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers
Sustainability
community resilience
climate risk
social learning
social capital
author_facet Olivia Jensen
Corinne Ong
author_sort Olivia Jensen
title Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers
title_short Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers
title_full Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers
title_fullStr Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative Action for Community Resilience to Climate Risks: Opportunities and Barriers
title_sort collaborative action for community resilience to climate risks: opportunities and barriers
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Collaborative actions between citizens and government agencies at the local level have the potential to raise community resilience to climate risks via social learning and increased social capital. However, for these actions to succeed, community members’ values, norms and risk perceptions must support collaborative action and be accompanied by self-efficacy. This paper develops a theoretical framework linking these concepts and applies the framework to a collaborative climate risk project in Singapore, using qualitative data from focus group discussions. We find that pro-social values are a strong enabling factor for residents to engage in collaboration, but that perceptions of low collective efficacy are a potential barrier. In particular, we find that the relative competence of the government leads to a perception of “exemptionalism,” which undermines individuals’ intentions to devote resources to collaborative action.
topic community resilience
climate risk
social learning
social capital
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3413
work_keys_str_mv AT oliviajensen collaborativeactionforcommunityresiliencetoclimaterisksopportunitiesandbarriers
AT corinneong collaborativeactionforcommunityresiliencetoclimaterisksopportunitiesandbarriers
_version_ 1724792417528315904