Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States

Purpose: Preoperative short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma has been studied in European trials, but is not often used in the United States. We aim to describe the utilization of preoperative SCRT among patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar Abdel-Rahman, MD, Hesham M. Elhalawani, MD, Pamela K. Allen, PhD, Emma B. Holliday, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-10-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418301283
id doaj-d290ffe51f1843549a076ff3af5b06d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d290ffe51f1843549a076ff3af5b06d72020-11-25T00:10:10ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942018-10-0134611620Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United StatesOmar Abdel-Rahman, MD0Hesham M. Elhalawani, MD1Pamela K. Allen, PhD2Emma B. Holliday, MD3Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams University, Cairo, EgyptRadiation Oncology Department, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasRadiation Oncology Department, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasRadiation Oncology Department, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Corresponding author. Radiation Oncology Department, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1140, Houston, TX 77030.Purpose: Preoperative short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma has been studied in European trials, but is not often used in the United States. We aim to describe the utilization of preoperative SCRT among patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer in the National Cancer Database and describe factors associated with its use. Methods and materials: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients treated with preoperative radiation therapy followed by surgery for nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2014. Patient, tumor, and treatment-related characteristics were compared between patients treated with SCRT (20-25 Gy in <7 fractions) and patients treated with long-course radiation therapy (45-70 Gy in ≥ 25 fractions). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with overall survival. Survival rates were compared using an inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment method. Results: A total of 42,336 patients were included for analysis of which 41,867 patients (98.9%) were treated with long-course radiation therapy and 469 patients (1.1%) with SCRT. Patients treated with SCRT were older, had more comorbidities, had earlier T-stage, and were more likely to be clinically node-negative. Patients treated with SCRT were more likely to be treated at an academic center, have Medicare insurance, and be treated without chemotherapy. Patients treated with SCRT had lower pathological complete response rates (4.3% vs 6.9%; P < .001) and higher rates of positive circumferential resection margins (8.3% vs 5.2%; P = .001). On multivariate analysis, radiation fractionation was not significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusions: SCRT is used for only approximately 1% of patients treated preoperatively for nonmetastatic rectal cancer in the United States. The results of recently completed randomized trials may further inform patterns of practice in the United States and abroad.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418301283
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omar Abdel-Rahman, MD
Hesham M. Elhalawani, MD
Pamela K. Allen, PhD
Emma B. Holliday, MD
spellingShingle Omar Abdel-Rahman, MD
Hesham M. Elhalawani, MD
Pamela K. Allen, PhD
Emma B. Holliday, MD
Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Omar Abdel-Rahman, MD
Hesham M. Elhalawani, MD
Pamela K. Allen, PhD
Emma B. Holliday, MD
author_sort Omar Abdel-Rahman, MD
title Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
title_short Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
title_full Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
title_fullStr Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
title_sort utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the united states
publisher Elsevier
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
issn 2452-1094
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Purpose: Preoperative short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma has been studied in European trials, but is not often used in the United States. We aim to describe the utilization of preoperative SCRT among patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer in the National Cancer Database and describe factors associated with its use. Methods and materials: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients treated with preoperative radiation therapy followed by surgery for nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2014. Patient, tumor, and treatment-related characteristics were compared between patients treated with SCRT (20-25 Gy in <7 fractions) and patients treated with long-course radiation therapy (45-70 Gy in ≥ 25 fractions). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with overall survival. Survival rates were compared using an inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment method. Results: A total of 42,336 patients were included for analysis of which 41,867 patients (98.9%) were treated with long-course radiation therapy and 469 patients (1.1%) with SCRT. Patients treated with SCRT were older, had more comorbidities, had earlier T-stage, and were more likely to be clinically node-negative. Patients treated with SCRT were more likely to be treated at an academic center, have Medicare insurance, and be treated without chemotherapy. Patients treated with SCRT had lower pathological complete response rates (4.3% vs 6.9%; P < .001) and higher rates of positive circumferential resection margins (8.3% vs 5.2%; P = .001). On multivariate analysis, radiation fractionation was not significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusions: SCRT is used for only approximately 1% of patients treated preoperatively for nonmetastatic rectal cancer in the United States. The results of recently completed randomized trials may further inform patterns of practice in the United States and abroad.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418301283
work_keys_str_mv AT omarabdelrahmanmd utilizationofshortcourseradiationtherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticrectaladenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT heshammelhalawanimd utilizationofshortcourseradiationtherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticrectaladenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT pamelakallenphd utilizationofshortcourseradiationtherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticrectaladenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT emmabhollidaymd utilizationofshortcourseradiationtherapyforpatientswithnonmetastaticrectaladenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
_version_ 1725409001965879296