Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review

Rapid increase in population and growing concentration of capital in urban areas has escalated both the severity and longer-term impact of natural disasters. As a result, Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and reduction have been gaining increasing importance for urban areas. Remote sensing plays a key...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saman Ghaffarian, Norman Kerle, Tatiana Filatova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-11-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/11/1760
id doaj-d28b56785a5b43c781f01191eb6ae08d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d28b56785a5b43c781f01191eb6ae08d2020-11-25T00:37:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922018-11-011011176010.3390/rs10111760rs10111760Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A ReviewSaman Ghaffarian0Norman Kerle1Tatiana Filatova2Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The NetherlandsFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The NetherlandsCentre for Studies in Technology and Sustainable Development, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The NetherlandsRapid increase in population and growing concentration of capital in urban areas has escalated both the severity and longer-term impact of natural disasters. As a result, Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and reduction have been gaining increasing importance for urban areas. Remote sensing plays a key role in providing information for urban DRM analysis due to its agile data acquisition, synoptic perspective, growing range of data types, and instrument sophistication, as well as low cost. As a consequence numerous methods have been developed to extract information for various phases of DRM analysis. However, given the diverse information needs, only few of the parameters of interest are extracted directly, while the majority have to be elicited indirectly using proxies. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the proxies developed for two risk elements typically associated with pre-disaster situations (vulnerability and resilience), and two post-disaster elements (damage and recovery), while focusing on urban DRM. The proxies were reviewed in the context of four main environments and their corresponding sub-categories: built-up (buildings, transport, and others), economic (macro, regional and urban economics, and logistics), social (services and infrastructures, and socio-economic status), and natural. All environments and the corresponding proxies are discussed and analyzed in terms of their reliability and sufficiency in comprehensively addressing the selected DRM assessments. We highlight strength and identify gaps and limitations in current proxies, including inconsistencies in terminology for indirect measurements. We present a systematic overview for each group of the reviewed proxies that could simplify cross-fertilization across different DRM domains and may assist the further development of methods. While systemizing examples from the wider remote sensing domain and insights from social and economic sciences, we suggest a direction for developing new proxies, also potentially suitable for capturing functional recovery.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/11/1760urban DRMremote sensingdamagerecoveryvulnerabilityresilienceeconomicsocialproxyindirect measurement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saman Ghaffarian
Norman Kerle
Tatiana Filatova
spellingShingle Saman Ghaffarian
Norman Kerle
Tatiana Filatova
Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review
Remote Sensing
urban DRM
remote sensing
damage
recovery
vulnerability
resilience
economic
social
proxy
indirect measurement
author_facet Saman Ghaffarian
Norman Kerle
Tatiana Filatova
author_sort Saman Ghaffarian
title Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review
title_short Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review
title_full Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review
title_fullStr Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review
title_sort remote sensing-based proxies for urban disaster risk management and resilience: a review
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Rapid increase in population and growing concentration of capital in urban areas has escalated both the severity and longer-term impact of natural disasters. As a result, Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and reduction have been gaining increasing importance for urban areas. Remote sensing plays a key role in providing information for urban DRM analysis due to its agile data acquisition, synoptic perspective, growing range of data types, and instrument sophistication, as well as low cost. As a consequence numerous methods have been developed to extract information for various phases of DRM analysis. However, given the diverse information needs, only few of the parameters of interest are extracted directly, while the majority have to be elicited indirectly using proxies. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the proxies developed for two risk elements typically associated with pre-disaster situations (vulnerability and resilience), and two post-disaster elements (damage and recovery), while focusing on urban DRM. The proxies were reviewed in the context of four main environments and their corresponding sub-categories: built-up (buildings, transport, and others), economic (macro, regional and urban economics, and logistics), social (services and infrastructures, and socio-economic status), and natural. All environments and the corresponding proxies are discussed and analyzed in terms of their reliability and sufficiency in comprehensively addressing the selected DRM assessments. We highlight strength and identify gaps and limitations in current proxies, including inconsistencies in terminology for indirect measurements. We present a systematic overview for each group of the reviewed proxies that could simplify cross-fertilization across different DRM domains and may assist the further development of methods. While systemizing examples from the wider remote sensing domain and insights from social and economic sciences, we suggest a direction for developing new proxies, also potentially suitable for capturing functional recovery.
topic urban DRM
remote sensing
damage
recovery
vulnerability
resilience
economic
social
proxy
indirect measurement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/11/1760
work_keys_str_mv AT samanghaffarian remotesensingbasedproxiesforurbandisasterriskmanagementandresilienceareview
AT normankerle remotesensingbasedproxiesforurbandisasterriskmanagementandresilienceareview
AT tatianafilatova remotesensingbasedproxiesforurbandisasterriskmanagementandresilienceareview
_version_ 1725301870572863488