Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations

In the article, based on the data from study conducted in Lithuanian Education University, analysis was carried out on the topic of how different course students understand and appreciate the quality of studies and what expectations are linked to it. It showed that students understand the quality of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valdas Pruskus, Olga Palevičiūtė, Elena Kocai
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2015-06-01
Series:Coactivity: Philology, Educology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpe.2015.255
id doaj-d25bc9f8c422486ab611da4857b248af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d25bc9f8c422486ab611da4857b248af2020-11-24T22:31:08ZdeuVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityCoactivity: Philology, Educology2351-714X2335-77112015-06-01231142510.3846/cpe.2015.255Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their ExpectationsValdas Pruskus0Olga Palevičiūtė1Elena Kocai2Lithuanian University of Educational SciencesLithuanian University of Educational SciencesLithuanian University of Educational SciencesIn the article, based on the data from study conducted in Lithuanian Education University, analysis was carried out on the topic of how different course students understand and appreciate the quality of studies and what expectations are linked to it. It showed that students understand the quality of studies differently and have different priorities. I and II course students understand the quality of studies as “suitable conditions for self-development and qualification acquisition” while fourth year students understand it as “contribution to learning and preparation for a successful career”. Higher requirements for quality of studies were raised by senior students than junior. Lower course students raised more criticism to administrative staff for lack of support for students on issues failure. Lower course students raised more criticism to administrative staff due to the lack of support for students on questions assotiated with study process issues. They also had more criticism for the lack of student awareness about university follow-updevelopment plans. The lower course students have more requirements than the higher course students in such areas: the effectiveness of the university administration, student admissions and organization for support, professional development of academic staff. The students expect more support from the university staff when adapting to studies conditions and requirements, they are not satisfied with how their personal skills are being developed during their studies, how much time teacher gives during his consultation, there is a lack of teachers impartiality and objectivity.http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpe.2015.255quality of studystudentscriterium of quality of studyuniversityhigher education
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valdas Pruskus
Olga Palevičiūtė
Elena Kocai
spellingShingle Valdas Pruskus
Olga Palevičiūtė
Elena Kocai
Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations
Coactivity: Philology, Educology
quality of study
students
criterium of quality of study
university
higher education
author_facet Valdas Pruskus
Olga Palevičiūtė
Elena Kocai
author_sort Valdas Pruskus
title Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations
title_short Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations
title_full Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations
title_fullStr Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations
title_full_unstemmed Students’ Evaluation of the Quality and Their Expectations
title_sort students’ evaluation of the quality and their expectations
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Coactivity: Philology, Educology
issn 2351-714X
2335-7711
publishDate 2015-06-01
description In the article, based on the data from study conducted in Lithuanian Education University, analysis was carried out on the topic of how different course students understand and appreciate the quality of studies and what expectations are linked to it. It showed that students understand the quality of studies differently and have different priorities. I and II course students understand the quality of studies as “suitable conditions for self-development and qualification acquisition” while fourth year students understand it as “contribution to learning and preparation for a successful career”. Higher requirements for quality of studies were raised by senior students than junior. Lower course students raised more criticism to administrative staff for lack of support for students on issues failure. Lower course students raised more criticism to administrative staff due to the lack of support for students on questions assotiated with study process issues. They also had more criticism for the lack of student awareness about university follow-updevelopment plans. The lower course students have more requirements than the higher course students in such areas: the effectiveness of the university administration, student admissions and organization for support, professional development of academic staff. The students expect more support from the university staff when adapting to studies conditions and requirements, they are not satisfied with how their personal skills are being developed during their studies, how much time teacher gives during his consultation, there is a lack of teachers impartiality and objectivity.
topic quality of study
students
criterium of quality of study
university
higher education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpe.2015.255
work_keys_str_mv AT valdaspruskus studentsevaluationofthequalityandtheirexpectations
AT olgapaleviciute studentsevaluationofthequalityandtheirexpectations
AT elenakocai studentsevaluationofthequalityandtheirexpectations
_version_ 1725738622154440704