Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error
Much of the geomorphic work of rivers occurs underwater. As a result, high resolution<br />quantification of geomorphic change in these submerged areas is important. Currently, to quantify this<br />change, multiple methods are required to get high resolution data for both the exposed an...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/20/2415 |
id |
doaj-d25b8ae97e0f4b5784451943dbcb186e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d25b8ae97e0f4b5784451943dbcb186e2020-11-25T00:10:07ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-10-011120241510.3390/rs11202415rs11202415Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable ErrorAmy S. Woodget0James T. Dietrich1Robin T. Wilson2Department of Geography and Environment, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UKDepartment of Geography, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614, USAIndependent Scholar, Southampton, SO16 6DB, UKMuch of the geomorphic work of rivers occurs underwater. As a result, high resolution<br />quantification of geomorphic change in these submerged areas is important. Currently, to quantify this<br />change, multiple methods are required to get high resolution data for both the exposed and submerged<br />areas. Remote sensing methods are often limited to the exposed areas due to the challenges imposed<br />by the water, and those remote sensing methods for below the water surface require the collection of<br />extensive calibration data in-channel, which is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and sometimes<br />prohibitive in dicult-to-access areas. Within this paper, we pioneer a novel approach for quantifying<br />above- and below-water geomorphic change using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry and<br />investigate the implications of water surface elevations, refraction correction measures, and the<br />spatial variability of topographic errors. We use two epochs of imagery from a site on the River Teme,<br />Herefordshire, UK, collected using a remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS) and processed using<br />Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry. For the first time, we show that: (1) Quantification of<br />submerged geomorphic change to levels of accuracy commensurate with exposed areas is possible<br />without the need for calibration data or a dierent method from exposed areas; (2) there is minimal<br />dierence in results produced by dierent refraction correction procedures using predominantly<br />nadir imagery (small angle vs. multi-view), allowing users a choice of software packages/processing<br />complexity; (3) improvements to our estimations of water surface elevations are critical for accurate<br />topographic estimation in submerged areas and can reduce mean elevation error by up to 73%;<br />and (4) we can use machine learning, in the form of multiple linear regressions, and a Gaussian Naïve<br />Bayes classifier, based on the relationship between error and 11 independent variables, to generate a<br />high resolution, spatially continuous model of geomorphic change in submerged areas, constrained by<br />spatially variable error estimates. Our multiple regression model is capable of explaining up to 54%<br />of magnitude and direction of topographic error, with accuracies of less than 0.04 m. With on-going<br />testing and improvements, this machine learning approach has potential for routine application in<br />spatially variable error estimation within the RPAS−SfM workflow.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/20/2415fluvialgeomorphologychange detectionremotely piloted aircraft systemrefraction correctionstructure-from-motion photogrammetrywater surface elevationtopographic errormachine learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amy S. Woodget James T. Dietrich Robin T. Wilson |
spellingShingle |
Amy S. Woodget James T. Dietrich Robin T. Wilson Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error Remote Sensing fluvial geomorphology change detection remotely piloted aircraft system refraction correction structure-from-motion photogrammetry water surface elevation topographic error machine learning |
author_facet |
Amy S. Woodget James T. Dietrich Robin T. Wilson |
author_sort |
Amy S. Woodget |
title |
Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error |
title_short |
Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error |
title_full |
Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error |
title_fullStr |
Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error |
title_sort |
quantifying below-water fluvial geomorphic change: the implications of refraction correction, water surface elevations, and spatially variable error |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Much of the geomorphic work of rivers occurs underwater. As a result, high resolution<br />quantification of geomorphic change in these submerged areas is important. Currently, to quantify this<br />change, multiple methods are required to get high resolution data for both the exposed and submerged<br />areas. Remote sensing methods are often limited to the exposed areas due to the challenges imposed<br />by the water, and those remote sensing methods for below the water surface require the collection of<br />extensive calibration data in-channel, which is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and sometimes<br />prohibitive in dicult-to-access areas. Within this paper, we pioneer a novel approach for quantifying<br />above- and below-water geomorphic change using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry and<br />investigate the implications of water surface elevations, refraction correction measures, and the<br />spatial variability of topographic errors. We use two epochs of imagery from a site on the River Teme,<br />Herefordshire, UK, collected using a remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS) and processed using<br />Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry. For the first time, we show that: (1) Quantification of<br />submerged geomorphic change to levels of accuracy commensurate with exposed areas is possible<br />without the need for calibration data or a dierent method from exposed areas; (2) there is minimal<br />dierence in results produced by dierent refraction correction procedures using predominantly<br />nadir imagery (small angle vs. multi-view), allowing users a choice of software packages/processing<br />complexity; (3) improvements to our estimations of water surface elevations are critical for accurate<br />topographic estimation in submerged areas and can reduce mean elevation error by up to 73%;<br />and (4) we can use machine learning, in the form of multiple linear regressions, and a Gaussian Naïve<br />Bayes classifier, based on the relationship between error and 11 independent variables, to generate a<br />high resolution, spatially continuous model of geomorphic change in submerged areas, constrained by<br />spatially variable error estimates. Our multiple regression model is capable of explaining up to 54%<br />of magnitude and direction of topographic error, with accuracies of less than 0.04 m. With on-going<br />testing and improvements, this machine learning approach has potential for routine application in<br />spatially variable error estimation within the RPAS−SfM workflow. |
topic |
fluvial geomorphology change detection remotely piloted aircraft system refraction correction structure-from-motion photogrammetry water surface elevation topographic error machine learning |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/20/2415 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amyswoodget quantifyingbelowwaterfluvialgeomorphicchangetheimplicationsofrefractioncorrectionwatersurfaceelevationsandspatiallyvariableerror AT jamestdietrich quantifyingbelowwaterfluvialgeomorphicchangetheimplicationsofrefractioncorrectionwatersurfaceelevationsandspatiallyvariableerror AT robintwilson quantifyingbelowwaterfluvialgeomorphicchangetheimplicationsofrefractioncorrectionwatersurfaceelevationsandspatiallyvariableerror |
_version_ |
1725409207672373248 |