What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?

Most biological models of intermediate size, and probably all large models, need to cope with the fact that many of their parameter values are unknown. In addition, it may not be possible to identify these values unambiguously on the basis of experimental data. This poses the question how reliable p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward Kent, Stefan Neumann, Ursula Kummer, Pedro Mendes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3828278?pdf=render
id doaj-d2557e0971704118be3852fd9bca581c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2557e0971704118be3852fd9bca581c2020-11-24T20:50:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e7924410.1371/journal.pone.0079244What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?Edward KentStefan NeumannUrsula KummerPedro MendesMost biological models of intermediate size, and probably all large models, need to cope with the fact that many of their parameter values are unknown. In addition, it may not be possible to identify these values unambiguously on the basis of experimental data. This poses the question how reliable predictions made using such models are. Sensitivity analysis is commonly used to measure the impact of each model parameter on its variables. However, the results of such analyses can be dependent on an exact set of parameter values due to nonlinearity. To mitigate this problem, global sensitivity analysis techniques are used to calculate parameter sensitivities in a wider parameter space. We applied global sensitivity analysis to a selection of five signalling and metabolic models, several of which incorporate experimentally well-determined parameters. Assuming these models represent physiological reality, we explored how the results could change under increasing amounts of parameter uncertainty. Our results show that parameter sensitivities calculated with the physiological parameter values are not necessarily the most frequently observed under random sampling, even in a small interval around the physiological values. Often multimodal distributions were observed. Unsurprisingly, the range of possible sensitivity coefficient values increased with the level of parameter uncertainty, though the amount of parameter uncertainty at which the pattern of control was able to change differed among the models analysed. We suggest that this level of uncertainty can be used as a global measure of model robustness. Finally a comparison of different global sensitivity analysis techniques shows that, if high-throughput computing resources are available, then random sampling may actually be the most suitable technique.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3828278?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edward Kent
Stefan Neumann
Ursula Kummer
Pedro Mendes
spellingShingle Edward Kent
Stefan Neumann
Ursula Kummer
Pedro Mendes
What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Edward Kent
Stefan Neumann
Ursula Kummer
Pedro Mendes
author_sort Edward Kent
title What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
title_short What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
title_full What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
title_fullStr What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
title_full_unstemmed What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
title_sort what can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Most biological models of intermediate size, and probably all large models, need to cope with the fact that many of their parameter values are unknown. In addition, it may not be possible to identify these values unambiguously on the basis of experimental data. This poses the question how reliable predictions made using such models are. Sensitivity analysis is commonly used to measure the impact of each model parameter on its variables. However, the results of such analyses can be dependent on an exact set of parameter values due to nonlinearity. To mitigate this problem, global sensitivity analysis techniques are used to calculate parameter sensitivities in a wider parameter space. We applied global sensitivity analysis to a selection of five signalling and metabolic models, several of which incorporate experimentally well-determined parameters. Assuming these models represent physiological reality, we explored how the results could change under increasing amounts of parameter uncertainty. Our results show that parameter sensitivities calculated with the physiological parameter values are not necessarily the most frequently observed under random sampling, even in a small interval around the physiological values. Often multimodal distributions were observed. Unsurprisingly, the range of possible sensitivity coefficient values increased with the level of parameter uncertainty, though the amount of parameter uncertainty at which the pattern of control was able to change differed among the models analysed. We suggest that this level of uncertainty can be used as a global measure of model robustness. Finally a comparison of different global sensitivity analysis techniques shows that, if high-throughput computing resources are available, then random sampling may actually be the most suitable technique.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3828278?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardkent whatcanwelearnfromglobalsensitivityanalysisofbiochemicalsystems
AT stefanneumann whatcanwelearnfromglobalsensitivityanalysisofbiochemicalsystems
AT ursulakummer whatcanwelearnfromglobalsensitivityanalysisofbiochemicalsystems
AT pedromendes whatcanwelearnfromglobalsensitivityanalysisofbiochemicalsystems
_version_ 1716804720998219776