Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis

Many mountainous regions depend on seasonal snowfall for their water resources. Current methods of predicting the availability of water resources rely on long-term relationships between stream discharge and snowpack monitoring at isolated locations, which are less reliable during abnormal snow y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. St. Clair, W. S. Holbrook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-12-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/2997/2017/tc-11-2997-2017.pdf
id doaj-d24dd6b0ad5a4872a54c254ffe25b5fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d24dd6b0ad5a4872a54c254ffe25b5fc2020-11-24T20:48:21ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242017-12-01112997300910.5194/tc-11-2997-2017Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysisJ. St. Clair0J. St. Clair1W. S. Holbrook2W. S. Holbrook3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Idaho, Idaho Falls, Idaho Falls, ID 83402, USADepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USADept. of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAMany mountainous regions depend on seasonal snowfall for their water resources. Current methods of predicting the availability of water resources rely on long-term relationships between stream discharge and snowpack monitoring at isolated locations, which are less reliable during abnormal snow years. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been shown to be an effective tool for measuring snow water equivalent (SWE) because of the close relationship between snow density and radar velocity. However, the standard methods of measuring radar velocity can be time-consuming. Here we apply a migration focusing method originally developed for extracting velocity information from diffracted energy observed in zero-offset seismic sections to the problem of estimating radar velocities in seasonal snow from common-offset GPR data. Diffractions are isolated by plane-wave-destruction (PWD) filtering and the optimal migration velocity is chosen based on the varimax norm of the migrated image. We then use the radar velocity to estimate snow density, depth, and SWE. The GPR-derived SWE estimates are within 6 % of manual SWE measurements when the GPR antenna is coupled to the snow surface and 3–21 % of the manual measurements when the antenna is mounted on the front of a snowmobile  ∼  0.5 m above the snow surface.https://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/2997/2017/tc-11-2997-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. St. Clair
J. St. Clair
W. S. Holbrook
W. S. Holbrook
spellingShingle J. St. Clair
J. St. Clair
W. S. Holbrook
W. S. Holbrook
Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis
The Cryosphere
author_facet J. St. Clair
J. St. Clair
W. S. Holbrook
W. S. Holbrook
author_sort J. St. Clair
title Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis
title_short Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis
title_full Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis
title_fullStr Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis
title_sort measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset gpr records through migration velocity analysis
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The Cryosphere
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Many mountainous regions depend on seasonal snowfall for their water resources. Current methods of predicting the availability of water resources rely on long-term relationships between stream discharge and snowpack monitoring at isolated locations, which are less reliable during abnormal snow years. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been shown to be an effective tool for measuring snow water equivalent (SWE) because of the close relationship between snow density and radar velocity. However, the standard methods of measuring radar velocity can be time-consuming. Here we apply a migration focusing method originally developed for extracting velocity information from diffracted energy observed in zero-offset seismic sections to the problem of estimating radar velocities in seasonal snow from common-offset GPR data. Diffractions are isolated by plane-wave-destruction (PWD) filtering and the optimal migration velocity is chosen based on the varimax norm of the migrated image. We then use the radar velocity to estimate snow density, depth, and SWE. The GPR-derived SWE estimates are within 6 % of manual SWE measurements when the GPR antenna is coupled to the snow surface and 3–21 % of the manual measurements when the antenna is mounted on the front of a snowmobile  ∼  0.5 m above the snow surface.
url https://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/2997/2017/tc-11-2997-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jstclair measuringsnowwaterequivalentfromcommonoffsetgprrecordsthroughmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT jstclair measuringsnowwaterequivalentfromcommonoffsetgprrecordsthroughmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT wsholbrook measuringsnowwaterequivalentfromcommonoffsetgprrecordsthroughmigrationvelocityanalysis
AT wsholbrook measuringsnowwaterequivalentfromcommonoffsetgprrecordsthroughmigrationvelocityanalysis
_version_ 1716808048532520960