Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos

During the eighties, a medicai accident led to political scandals in several industrialised countries. In others however the same problem went nearly unnoticed. The massive HIV-contamination of haemophiliacs and blood transfusion recipients provides an interesting example of risk management on an in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Monica Steffen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2002-01-01
Series:Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/made/article/viewFile/22115/14479
id doaj-d247ee8dde184ba9b9e7647f865eeb34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d247ee8dde184ba9b9e7647f865eeb342021-03-02T03:38:37ZengUniversidade Federal do ParanáDesenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente1518-952X2176-91092002-01-0153948Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscosMonica SteffenDuring the eighties, a medicai accident led to political scandals in several industrialised countries. In others however the same problem went nearly unnoticed. The massive HIV-contamination of haemophiliacs and blood transfusion recipients provides an interesting example of risk management on an international scale, with an extremely wide range of public and political reactions to health risks. Why do public responses to risk vary? In order to answer this question, three arguments will be developed here. First, the potential of public mobilisation is particularly high in fields laden with symbolic values, such as medicine, blood and other vital fluids. Second, the difficulties in decision-making and in the implementation of risk reducing strategies can be traced back to institutional factors. Third, assessment of success and failure in risk management has to distinguish between the technical level and the political level of problem solving. The arguments developed here result to a large extent from an international policy comparison concerning the HIV-risk in the blood transfusion sector. The First part presents approaches and concepts from social sciences towards understanding the variations in public responses to risk alarm. The second part focuses on particular elements from the blood transfusion example and shows their general significance for risk management.http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/made/article/viewFile/22115/14479public reactions to riskHIV-contamintlion of blood transfusion recipientsvariations in risk management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monica Steffen
spellingShingle Monica Steffen
Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
public reactions to risk
HIV-contamintlion of blood transfusion recipients
variations in risk management
author_facet Monica Steffen
author_sort Monica Steffen
title Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
title_short Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
title_full Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
title_fullStr Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
title_full_unstemmed Respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
title_sort respostas públicas, sucesso e fracasso no gerenciamento de riscos
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
series Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente
issn 1518-952X
2176-9109
publishDate 2002-01-01
description During the eighties, a medicai accident led to political scandals in several industrialised countries. In others however the same problem went nearly unnoticed. The massive HIV-contamination of haemophiliacs and blood transfusion recipients provides an interesting example of risk management on an international scale, with an extremely wide range of public and political reactions to health risks. Why do public responses to risk vary? In order to answer this question, three arguments will be developed here. First, the potential of public mobilisation is particularly high in fields laden with symbolic values, such as medicine, blood and other vital fluids. Second, the difficulties in decision-making and in the implementation of risk reducing strategies can be traced back to institutional factors. Third, assessment of success and failure in risk management has to distinguish between the technical level and the political level of problem solving. The arguments developed here result to a large extent from an international policy comparison concerning the HIV-risk in the blood transfusion sector. The First part presents approaches and concepts from social sciences towards understanding the variations in public responses to risk alarm. The second part focuses on particular elements from the blood transfusion example and shows their general significance for risk management.
topic public reactions to risk
HIV-contamintlion of blood transfusion recipients
variations in risk management
url http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/made/article/viewFile/22115/14479
work_keys_str_mv AT monicasteffen respostaspublicassucessoefracassonogerenciamentoderiscos
_version_ 1724243552567820288